19 May
2009
19 May
'09
5:01 p.m.
drew Roberts wrote:
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 09:48:11 Fons Adriaensen
wrote:
Hi Drew,
If you are referring to me, then I would like to remove myself from the
dbus issue. I am currently concerned about PA usage for non technical
users and/or "Ralf Maldorf's" attitude towards Linux Audio as a platform.
Cheers.
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:40:58PM +0700, Patrick
Shirkey wrote:
Fons, I think some people have misunderstood some things you have said in this
thread. In this case I think you misunderstood Patrick. (Or I did - not a bad
possibility.)
I think what he was saying was that jackdbus would check for jackd in $PATH
and complain bitterly / refuse to sintall / whatever. Not that it would try
and control what $PATH was set to. Or perhaps you got that and I
misunderstood your objection.
Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
> Ideally, jackdbus shouldn't even allow jackd binary to
> exist in $PATH (and vice versa), to prevent the exact
> kind of situation that Fons is experiencing.
>
Programs that do that kind of things have a name
here: malware. I'm the boss on my system, and I
will decide what goes into $PATH. Just as I decide
which filesystems get mounted and where, and how
permissions are set.
If there is proper understanding and objections /
differences still remain,
that is one thing. So often in life we are disagreeing with what we think
people mean when if fact we may agree with what they actually mean.
Ciao.
all the best,
drew
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
19 May
19 May
6:59 p.m.
New subject: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus...
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 15:02:59 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
drew Roberts wrote:
Hey Patrick,
I don't think I was referring to you.
"> Krzysztof Foltman wrote:"
I think I was referring to what I thought was Fons misunderstanding what
Krzysztof wrote. Of if you were referring to me thinking some people had
misunderstood some of what Fons had written earlier, I don't remember the
details, I just remember thinking when I was reading that some of the heat
that seemed to be being generated seemed to be coming from possible
misunderstandings or quick scanning of posts.
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 09:48:11 Fons Adriaensen
wrote:
Hi Drew,
If you are referring to me, then I would like to remove myself from the
dbus issue. On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:40:58PM +0700, Patrick
Shirkey wrote:
Fons, I think some people have misunderstood some things you have said in
this thread. In this case I think you misunderstood Patrick. (Or I did -
not a bad possibility.)
I think what he was saying was that jackdbus would check for jackd in
$PATH and complain bitterly / refuse to sintall / whatever. Not that it
would try and control what $PATH was set to. Or perhaps you got that and
I misunderstood your objection. Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
> Ideally, jackdbus shouldn't even allow jackd binary to
> exist in $PATH (and vice versa), to prevent the exact
> kind of situation that Fons is experiencing.
Programs that do that kind of things have a name
here: malware. I'm the boss on my system, and I
will decide what goes into $PATH. Just as I decide
which filesystems get mounted and where, and how
permissions are set. I am currently concerned about PA usage for non
technical
users and/or "Ralf Maldorf's" attitude towards Linux Audio as a platform.
Cheers.
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.
all the best,
drew
If there is proper understanding and objections /
differences still
remain, that is one thing. So often in life we are disagreeing with what
we think people mean when if fact we may agree with what they actually
mean.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
!DSPAM:4a13023a181125312211103! Ciao.
all the best,
drew
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
5669
days inactive
5669
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
drew Roberts -
Patrick Shirkey