14 Apr
2007
14 Apr
'07
7:02 p.m.
Folks,
There are no pd packages for X86_64 on CCRMA. Can I install the ones
for i386 instead and will it then work with everything else ?
Thanks.
Al
14 Apr
14 Apr
9:27 p.m.
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:04 -0400, lanas wrote:
Folks,
There are no pd packages for X86_64 on CCRMA. Can I install the ones
for i386 instead and will it then work with everything else ?
I have not tried. Most probably not - pd does not yet (AFAIK) work on 64
bit architectures. 64bit linuxes are not yet a good choice if you are
interested on programmable media creation environments like pd,
supercollider or chuck (cm/clm/cmn do work).
-- Fernando
15 Apr
15 Apr
8:28 a.m.
Hallo,
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano hat gesagt: // Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:04 -0400, lanas wrote:
Note that most recent versions of Pd finally do run okay on 64 bit, I
guess starting with 0.40. I didn't try myself, though.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
There are no pd packages for X86_64 on CCRMA.
Can I install the ones
for i386 instead and will it then work with everything else ?
I have not tried. Most probably not - pd does not yet (AFAIK) work on 64
bit architectures. 64bit linuxes are not yet a good choice if you are
interested on programmable media creation environments like pd,
supercollider or chuck (cm/clm/cmn do work).
9:22 p.m.
Le Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:28:31 +0200,
Frank Barknecht <fbar(a)footils.org> a écrit :
Hi Frank,
Note that most recent versions of Pd finally do run
okay on 64 bit, I
guess starting with 0.40. I didn't try myself, though.
Do you specifically mean the 32 bits packages running on a 64-bit
platform ?
Cheers.
16 Apr
16 Apr
8:34 a.m.
Hallo,
lanas hat gesagt: // lanas wrote:
Le Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:28:31 +0200,
Frank Barknecht <fbar(a)footils.org> a écrit :
No, I'm talking about real 64-bit Pd. There was a nasty bug with the
arrays and [table]s, when Pd was compiled for 64 bit. This seems to be
solved AFAIK. At least there's an amd64 package for Pd in Debian with
no open bug reports in regard to arrays.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
Note that most recent versions of Pd finally do
run okay on 64 bit, I
guess starting with 0.40. I didn't try myself, though.
Do you specifically mean the 32 bits packages running on a 64-bit
platform ? 
12:17 p.m.
No, I'm talking about real 64-bit Pd. There was a
nasty bug with the
arrays and [table]s, when Pd was compiled for 64 bit. This seems to be
solved AFAIK. At least there's an amd64 package for Pd in Debian with
no open bug reports in regard to arrays.
pd runs fine on Debian 64bit in 64 bit mode but the package they offer
is pre 0.40 and contain this nasty bug if nothing have changed recently.
And lot of externals were missing, I end up compiling a lot myself.
Cheers,
Malte
--
Malte Steiner
media art + development
-www.block4.com-
18 Apr
18 Apr
12:31 p.m.
Hallo,
Malte Steiner hat gesagt: // Malte Steiner wrote:
pd runs fine on Debian 64bit in 64 bit mode but the
package they offer
is pre 0.40 and contain this nasty bug if nothing have changed recently.
I think, Debian testing/unstable has pd-0.40 now.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
16 Apr
16 Apr
11:30 p.m.
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 12:34 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
lanas hat gesagt: // lanas wrote:
Do you know if this bug is solved in the current pd-extended cvs?
-- Fernando
Le Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:28:31 +0200,
Frank Barknecht <fbar(a)footils.org> a écrit :
No, I'm talking about real 64-bit Pd. There was a nasty bug with the
arrays and [table]s, when Pd was compiled for 64 bit. This seems to be
solved AFAIK. At least there's an amd64 package for Pd in Debian with
no open bug reports in regard to arrays. Note that most recent versions of Pd finally do
run okay on 64 bit, I
guess starting with 0.40. I didn't try myself, though.
Do you specifically mean the 32 bits packages running on a 64-bit
platform ?
18 Apr
18 Apr
12:34 p.m.
Hallo,
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano hat gesagt: // Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Do you know if this bug is solved in the current
pd-extended cvs?
Depends on what you view as "current pd-extended cvs": I don't use
pd-extended, but AFAIK it consists just of a tagged/branched copy of
the HEAD of CVS. But for pd-extended 0.39 this version probably is
based on 0.39, where the 64bit bug still persisted unless there's a
patch applied to the pd-ext sources when compiling.
Generally the Pd version in pd-extended lags behind Miller's Pd one or
two versions (Current MSP-Pd already is at 0.41)
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
6270
days inactive
6274
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
9 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Dave Phillips -
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano -
Frank Barknecht -
lanas -
Malte Steiner