5 Mar
2010
5 Mar
'10
7:08 a.m.
Hi, maybe you can enlighten me on the alternatives.
It just seems to me that the majority of audio devs, simply don't seem
to care about session management. So my idea is just to force them to.
Gerald
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:47 +0300, alex stone wrote:
I disagree with LASH inclusion in jack itself.
There is work going to consider alternatives at the moment.
Alex.
5 Mar
5 Mar
12:07 p.m.
New subject: [LAD] Descent synth as dssi
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:08 +0100, Gerald Mwangi wrote:
Hi, maybe you can enlighten me on the alternatives.
It just seems to me that the majority of audio devs, simply don't seem
to care about session management. So my idea is just to force them to.
Gerald
You could "force" my interest in session management with about £2000 per
month after tax.
DSSI has bugger all to do with session setup and management. It's the
job of the DSSI host to sort all that out.
Gordon MM0YEQ
6:30 p.m.
New subject: [LAD] Descent synth as dssi
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:11:03PM +0000, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:08 +0100, Gerald Mwangi
wrote:
I think that is why he wants DSSI synths instead of jack synths.
Hi, maybe you can enlighten me on the
alternatives.
It just seems to me that the majority of audio devs, simply don't seem
to care about session management. So my idea is just to force them to.
Gerald
You could "force" my interest in session management with about ?2000 per
month after tax.
DSSI has bugger all to do with session setup and management. It's the
job of the DSSI host to sort all that out. 
8:02 p.m.
New subject: [LAD] Descent synth as dssi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 05.03.2010 17:11, schrieb Gordon JC Pearce:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:08 +0100, Gerald Mwangi
wrote:
Huuuu .. . thats quite some price for just session-management ;-)
Remember that PD writes Ardour for just about that...
but on second thought: if everytime, someone complains about the lack of
session management, a Euro would be sent to an account, there would be
more then enough money to "enforce" the development of such a beast.
Even with devs as expensive as you ;-)
And there would be plenty of money left to put marketing-weasels,
evangelist-bloggers and a CEO plus Secretary on the payroll too...
};-]
Hi, maybe you can enlighten me on the
alternatives.
It just seems to me that the majority of audio devs, simply don't seem
to care about session management. So my idea is just to force them to.
Gerald
You could "force" my interest in session management with about £2000 per
month after tax. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkuRm7EACgkQ1Aecwva1SWOYxQCff2SZgVo+PWE6htKyEPawoNRo
IogAnRaEABjqda/EdyQkGHnM/fPmESVn
=QDmz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
5189
days inactive
5189
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Gerald Mwangi -
Gordon JC Pearce -
Hartmut Noack -
Joshua Boyd