10 Apr
2006
10 Apr
'06
7:51 p.m.
Hello !
I am a lot interested by the Edirol UA-25. I think I will buy it ! :)
But before, I would like to know if some of you have tried it, have
known issues with it or not, were or were not able to get a low-latency
with JACK (64, 32 or 16 frames/period)... etc...
Thank you very much to share your experience with me, I need feedbacks
as soon as possible !
AD
10 Apr
10 Apr
8:08 p.m.
Adrien DANIEL wrote:
Hello !
I am a lot interested by the Edirol UA-25. I think I will buy it ! :)
But before, I would like to know if some of you have tried it, have
known issues with it or not, were or were not able to get a low-latency
with JACK (64, 32 or 16 frames/period)... etc...
Thank you very much to share your experience with me, I need feedbacks
as soon as possible !
It's been fine for me so far (reliable enough for gigs). Jack latency
is 10.6ms, can't remember the frames/period for that off the top of my
head. The response is fast enough for keyboard playing and live input
processing. To get that without xruns I had to use a fully-preemptible
kernel. I'd recommend it for getting sound in and out a laptop.
--
Jonny
Music - http://jeremah.co.uk
News - http://voxpolis.com
8:23 p.m.
Jonny Stutters <jstutters(a)jeremah.co.uk> wrote :
It's been fine for me so far (reliable enough for
gigs). Jack
latency is 10.6ms, can't remember the frames/period for that off the
top of my head. The response is fast enough for keyboard playing and
live input processing. To get that without xruns I had to use a
fully-preemptible kernel. I'd recommend it for getting sound in and
out a laptop.
Thank you very much !
You probably run JACK with 256 frames/period at 48000 Hz. I use a
Demudi testing distro, so I got the fully-preemtible kernel. I would
like to buy the UA-25 especially for a laptop use !
Some more experiences from others users ? :D
AD
8:36 p.m.
Some more experiences from others users ? :D
according to qjackctl I get 16msecs latency.
Kernel: custom vanilla 2.6.14.2 with RT-LSM-module. No further tricks.
BTW: I got some glitches as I used it on an Intel Mac, but it's fine on
Linux so I didn't investigate this further :) .
Best regards
ce
9:32 p.m.
Christoph Eckert wrote:
I use it at 44100hz, 128 frames/period, 4 periods/buffer (11.6ms)
without problems. No xruns. You can go down to 64 frames (5.8ms) with
some apps.
Regards,
c.
--
www.cesaremarilungo.com
Some more
experiences from others users ? :D
according to qjackctl I get 16msecs latency.
Kernel: custom vanilla 2.6.14.2 with RT-LSM-module. No further tricks.
BTW: I got some glitches as I used it on an Intel Mac, but it's fine on
Linux so I didn't investigate this further :) .
Best regards
ce
6804
days inactive
6805
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
7 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Adrien DANIEL -
Cesare Marilungo -
Christoph Eckert -
Jonny Stutters