30 Apr
2011
30 Apr
'11
8:16 a.m.
Hi all,
I've just finished work on a new track -- it's available for download or
streaming from my blog and from Bandcamp:
http://wootangent.net/2011/04/new-track-move-along/
http://pneuman.bandcamp.com/track/move-along
If you've heard any of my previous electronic works, this will seem
quite different -- it's just piano, bass, drums, and vocals. The
instruments are all soft-synths:
* Pianoteq for the piano sound (the K1 Grand)
* Linuxsampler CVS for drums, using an SFZ mapping of the RockStock kit
from Analogue Drums
* Fluidsynth-DSSI for the bass, using an SF2 file I dug up online
The parts were all sequenced in Qtractor, and then the audio was
recorded in to Ardour 3, along with the vocals, for mixing. I didn't go
crazy with plugins while mixing-- just compressors and filters/EQ (all
Calf), IR with a Bricasti M7 impulse response for reverb, and Rakarrack
with an Ampeg SVT-810 bass cabinet impulse response on the bass. It's
meant to sound like a simple, natural performance on real instruments,
and for the most part I think it achieves that well enough.
I also used the zita-at1 autotuner to do some subtle pitch correction on
the vocals. There were only a couple of notes that really needed
correction, so I turned off automatic correction (by disabling all of
the notes on the scale in the GUI) and then controlled it from a MIDI
track in Ardour, drawing in MIDI notes to trigger the correction just
where it was needed.
Thanks
Leigh
30 Apr
30 Apr
11:12 a.m.
Hello Leigh!
This is a beautiful little piece and certainly very different from the one
other track I have of yours. :-) I like the composition as such, the
harmonies.
But I think you didn't do your voice good. Too much bass/treble emphesis. It
sounds like this EQ-setup or perhaps it's part of an IR is much better suited
for a bass.
The bass - especially after 1:min44-45s seems to be very loud, when it gets
too high. When the first note happened directly after the end of your vocals,
I thought it was you singing "mh".
One last thing, that doesn't sit well with my ears is the drum kit. It
sounds a bit too low. Although if the toms really sound like, what I heard,
then I can understand, that you moved them back that far. Still due to the
soft drums, your voice, that sounds like it is coming from the wrong kind of -
probably - good speakers and the bass mostly being nice and decent, the piano
takes over too much.
Another thing it did like, was the background choir at the end. And if I
didn't mention it, the vocals themselves are very good. I didn't notice, where
you used zita-at1. I have a suspicion for one note and one only and even
there, I'm happy to accept that my ears are playing a trick on me. :-)
Good bit of music, pitty, you didn't do something like that earlier.
Thanks for sharing and best wishes
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
1 May
1 May
4:41 a.m.
On 30/04/11 19:12, Julien Claassen wrote:
Hello Leigh!
This is a beautiful little piece and certainly very different from the
one other track I have of yours. :-) I like the composition as such, the
harmonies.
But I think you didn't do your voice good. Too much bass/treble
emphesis. It sounds like this EQ-setup or perhaps it's part of an IR is
much better suited for a bass.
I used just a plain EQ on the vocal, and did take some of the bass out,
but I think you're right about having to take out more, and taking out
some of the high frequencies, too. I did try taking out more bass, and
that worked well on the verses, but it seemed to take too much away from
the chorus. I might just have to stop being lazy and set up separate EQs
for those different sections of the vocal :)
The bass - especially after 1:min44-45s seems to be
very loud, when it
gets too high. When the first note happened directly after the end of
your vocals, I thought it was you singing "mh".
Yep, this is a problem I never quite managed to solve; those higher
notes ring out quite loud. I tried some EQ to fix this, and I think it
helped, but not enough, so I'll have to look for another way to tackle this.
One last thing, that doesn't sit well with my ears
is the drum kit. It
sounds a bit too low. Although if the toms really sound like, what I
heard, then I can understand, that you moved them back that far. Still
due to the soft drums, your voice, that sounds like it is coming from
the wrong kind of - probably - good speakers and the bass mostly being
nice and decent, the piano takes over too much.
I think I was worried about the drums overpowering the piano, but in
hindsight that's probably exactly what they should do, to add a bit more
dynamic variety.
Another thing it did like, was the background choir at
the end. And if I
didn't mention it, the vocals themselves are very good. I didn't notice,
where you used zita-at1. I have a suspicion for one note and one only
and even there, I'm happy to accept that my ears are playing a trick on
me. :-)
I can ruin the mystery for you if you like :) I applied the tuning at
the end of the first verse (on "for me to go"), and on the first line of
the chorus (on "many years"). I too dislike the sounds of auto-tuned
vocals, so I was very impressed with zita-at1's ability to be set up in
a way that lets you perform small, specific corrections without
affecting the overall sound of the rest of the vocal at all.
Good bit of music, pitty, you didn't do something
like that earlier.
It was definitely a learning experience :) I'm not sure yet if I'll make
more tracks quite like this one, but I hope I can take some of what I've
learned and combine it with my more electronic ideas in future. Thanks
for listening!
Thanks
Leigh
30 Apr
30 Apr
12:21 p.m.
Leigh Dyer wrote:
Hi all,
I've just finished work on a new track -- it's available for download or
streaming from my blog and from Bandcamp:
http://wootangent.net/2011/04/new-track-move-along/
http://pneuman.bandcamp.com/track/move-along
If you've heard any of my previous electronic works, this will seem
quite different -- it's just piano, bass, drums, and vocals. The
instruments are all soft-synths:
* Pianoteq for the piano sound (the K1 Grand)
* Linuxsampler CVS for drums, using an SFZ mapping of the RockStock kit
from Analogue Drums
* Fluidsynth-DSSI for the bass, using an SF2 file I dug up online
The parts were all sequenced in Qtractor, and then the audio was
recorded in to Ardour 3, along with the vocals, for mixing. I didn't go
crazy with plugins while mixing-- just compressors and filters/EQ (all
Calf), IR with a Bricasti M7 impulse response for reverb, and Rakarrack
with an Ampeg SVT-810 bass cabinet impulse response on the bass. It's
meant to sound like a simple, natural performance on real instruments,
and for the most part I think it achieves that well enough.
I also used the zita-at1 autotuner to do some subtle pitch correction on
the vocals. There were only a couple of notes that really needed
correction, so I turned off automatic correction (by disabling all of
the notes on the scale in the GUI) and then controlled it from a MIDI
track in Ardour, drawing in MIDI notes to trigger the correction just
where it was needed.
Thanks
Leigh
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Hi Leigh
I don't think I've listened to any of your music before, so I'd no
preconceptions or expectations.
I found the vocals rather muddy, indistinct and distant, which is a
shame as you have a good voice.
To me, the piece seemed rather flat, lacking in dynamic contour; the
sparse instrumentation really didn't help in this regard. The drums were
rather quiet and didn't seem to add much energy to the mix at all.
Because the piano pretty much carries the piece I found it got very
monotonous, very quickly: the solo towards the end was a welcome relief
and the backing vocals were a nice touch but it was too little, too late
for me.
Overall, it's pleasant and good, but I feel with some work it could
deliver more.
Cheers
Q
1:57 p.m.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:21:30 +0100
Q <lists(a)quirq.ukfsn.org> wrote:
Leigh Dyer wrote:
It's a good song, and I like your singing, but the piano needs to be pushed a
*long* way further back in the mix.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
Hi all,
I've just finished work on a new track -- it's available for download or
streaming from my blog and from Bandcamp:
http://wootangent.net/2011/04/new-track-move-along/
http://pneuman.bandcamp.com/track/move-along
If you've heard any of my previous electronic works, this will seem
quite different -- it's just piano, bass, drums, and vocals. The
instruments are all soft-synths:
* Pianoteq for the piano sound (the K1 Grand)
* Linuxsampler CVS for drums, using an SFZ mapping of the RockStock kit
from Analogue Drums
* Fluidsynth-DSSI for the bass, using an SF2 file I dug up online
The parts were all sequenced in Qtractor, and then the audio was
recorded in to Ardour 3, along with the vocals, for mixing. I didn't go
crazy with plugins while mixing-- just compressors and filters/EQ (all
Calf), IR with a Bricasti M7 impulse response for reverb, and Rakarrack
with an Ampeg SVT-810 bass cabinet impulse response on the bass. It's
meant to sound like a simple, natural performance on real instruments,
and for the most part I think it achieves that well enough.
I also used the zita-at1 autotuner to do some subtle pitch correction on
the vocals. There were only a couple of notes that really needed
correction, so I turned off automatic correction (by disabling all of
the notes on the scale in the GUI) and then controlled it from a MIDI
track in Ardour, drawing in MIDI notes to trigger the correction just
where it was needed.
Thanks
Leigh
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Hi Leigh
I don't think I've listened to any of your music before, so I'd no
preconceptions or expectations.
I found the vocals rather muddy, indistinct and distant, which is a
shame as you have a good voice.
To me, the piece seemed rather flat, lacking in dynamic contour; the
sparse instrumentation really didn't help in this regard. The drums were
rather quiet and didn't seem to add much energy to the mix at all.
Because the piano pretty much carries the piece I found it got very
monotonous, very quickly: the solo towards the end was a welcome relief
and the backing vocals were a nice touch but it was too little, too late
for me.
Overall, it's pleasant and good, but I feel with some work it could
deliver more.
Cheers
Q 
2:24 p.m.
Leigh Dyer wrote:
Hi all,
...
Hi Leigh,
I liked it a lot. I agree with the other posters re: the placement of
the vocal, it's pretty well buried in the mix. If you're comfortable
using Autotune then you should be comfortable putting your voice out
front further. Btw, I didn't notice the tuning fixes either, and I
despise Autotune (aesthetically, that is - I'd use it if I thought I
could make a million dollars with it).
The tune itself is really good. I like the piano part, and I also liked
the distance on the drums, it made the piano and vocals sound like they
were being sung in the lounge with the drums in the kitchen. That's not
a left-handed compliment, I thought the effect was neat, whether
intended or not. Also, good playing throughout, you handled the
instrumental parts nicely.
The whole mix is too mid-rangey, which tends to bury vocals.
So, we want more. :)
Best,
dp
2:44 p.m.
--- On Sat, 4/30/11, Dave Phillips <dlphillips(a)woh.rr.com> wrote:
From: Dave Phillips <dlphillips(a)woh.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [LAU] Music made with Linux: "move along"
To: "Leigh Dyer" <lsd(a)wootangent.net>
Cc: "A list for linux audio users"
<linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org>
Date: Saturday, April 30, 2011, 8:23 AM
Leigh Dyer wrote:
Ben Folds Five-ish ;)
J.
Hi all,
...
1 May
1 May
5:06 a.m.
On 30/04/11 22:23, Dave Phillips wrote:
Leigh Dyer wrote:
I think you've hit the nail on the head with the vocals -- I should have
the confidence to put them further in front. When I listen to the vocals
I can't help but hear all the little problems, but everyone keeps
telling me that the vocal sounds fine, so I should probably start
listening :)
This piece started out on piano, and everything else (including the
lyrics/vocals) came afterward, and from the feedback here it seems like
I've mixed it as a piano track with a few extra bits to support it, when
really I should have the vocals up front and mix everything else to
support them.
Confidence, again, is a factor there I think -- I'm happiest with the
piano part, so I've let it take the focus. I need to learn not to just
turn a part down when I'm not totally happy with it :)
Hi all,
...
Hi Leigh,
I liked it a lot. I agree with the other posters re: the placement of
the vocal, it's pretty well buried in the mix. If you're comfortable
using Autotune then you should be comfortable putting your voice out
front further. Btw, I didn't notice the tuning fixes either, and I
despise Autotune (aesthetically, that is - I'd use it if I thought I
could make a million dollars with it). The tune itself is really good. I like the piano part,
and I also liked
the distance on the drums, it made the piano and vocals sound like they
were being sung in the lounge with the drums in the kitchen. That's not
a left-handed compliment, I thought the effect was neat, whether
intended or not. Also, good playing throughout, you handled the
instrumental parts nicely.
Totally unintentional on the drums :) I didn't want them to distract
from the relatively mellow feel of the rest of the track, but I think I
will bring them up a bit if/when I work on the mix again.
Thanks for listening, and thanks to everyone for your feedback -- it's
all been very helpful.
Thanks
Leigh
2 May
2 May
10:08 a.m.
2011/4/30 Leigh Dyer <lsd(a)wootangent.net>
I've just finished work on a new track -- it's
available for download or
streaming from my blog and from Bandcamp:
http://wootangent.net/2011/04/new-track-move-along/
http://pneuman.bandcamp.com/track/move-along
It's not bad, not bad at all. The piano sounds great, and you sing quite
well :-) My only complaints would be that the piano overwhelms the rest of
the instruments: it's not easy to listen to the drums and your voice. I'd
bring them up a bit; your voice should be heart as much as the piano, and
the drums should be felt as a thundering hammer. Ok, maybe this last bit is
personal taste, but you get my drift ;-)
Anyway, all in all, it's a good job. The least I can say is that I'm
listening to your previous work to know how different is from this track :-)
--
Roberto Suárez Soto
11:23 a.m.
On 02/05/11 18:08, Roberto Suárez Soto wrote:
2011/4/30 Leigh Dyer <lsd(a)wootangent.net
<mailto:lsd@wootangent.net>>
I've just finished work on a new track -- it's available for
download or streaming from my blog and from Bandcamp:
http://wootangent.net/2011/04/new-track-move-along/
http://pneuman.bandcamp.com/track/move-along
It's not bad, not bad at all. The piano sounds great, and you sing
quite well :-) My only complaints would be that the piano overwhelms the
rest of the instruments: it's not easy to listen to the drums and your
voice. I'd bring them up a bit; your voice should be heart as much as
the piano, and the drums should be felt as a thundering hammer. Ok,
maybe this last bit is personal taste, but you get my drift ;-)
That's definitely along the lines of the other feedback I've had here :)
I think I'll come back to this track again in a little while and re-do
the mix from scratch, focusing on the vocals and drums and adding less
piano and perhaps less bass, too.
Anyway, all in all, it's a good job. The
least I can say is that
I'm listening to your previous work to know how different is from this
track :-)
Thanks :) If you have any comments on my other tracks feel free to send
those through, too! I've re-arranged my tracks in to an album on my
Bandcamp page, so it's now much easier to stream them all in one go:
http://pneuman.bandcamp.com/album/sketchbook-vol-1
Thanks
Leigh
10:36 a.m.
----- "Leigh Dyer" <lsd(a)wootangent.net> wrote:
what microphone do you use? where is it when you sing
(close to your mouth, a bit away, a lot away)?
10:41 a.m.
On 02/05/11 18:36, Cedric Roux wrote:
----- "Leigh Dyer"<lsd(a)wootangent.net>
wrote:
what microphone do you use? where is it when you sing
(close to your mouth, a bit away, a lot away)?
Hi Cedric,
It's a Rode NT1-A, through one of the built-in preamps on my Saffire
PRO40 interface. I sing fairly close, about 15cm away from the mic I'd
say -- my recording room has a lot of reflective surfaces and no
acoustic treatment, so I'm trying to avoid getting too much room noise
in to the vocal recordings.
Thanks
Leigh
11:08 a.m.
On 05/02/2011 10:40 AM, Leigh Dyer wrote:
my recording room has a lot of reflective surfaces and
no
acoustic treatment, so I'm trying to avoid getting too much room noise
in to the vocal recordings.
Then I think you should try two things:
1) Move even closer to the mic, maybe 5cm. This will give you more
warmth in the recording + reduce reflections from the room.
AND
2) Damping the room, for instance if the mic is between a wall and your
mouth, place a mattress or heavy blanket on that wall. This will make
your recording more dry with less reflections from the room.
Hope that helps...
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
11:16 a.m.
On 02/05/11 19:07, Atte André Jensen wrote:
On 05/02/2011 10:40 AM, Leigh Dyer wrote:
I've read about doing this, but I'm yet to give it a go. I'll definitely
try both of your suggestions the next time I have vocals to record.
Thanks
Leigh
my recording room has a lot of reflective
surfaces and no
acoustic treatment, so I'm trying to avoid getting too much room noise
in to the vocal recordings.
Then I think you should try two things:
1) Move even closer to the mic, maybe 5cm. This will give you more
warmth in the recording + reduce reflections from the room.
AND
2) Damping the room, for instance if the mic is between a wall and your
mouth, place a mattress or heavy blanket on that wall. This will make
your recording more dry with less reflections from the room.
11 May
11 May
12:56 a.m.
Hi all,
I took all your advice on board, and when listening back over the track
with your feedback in mind, I couldn't disagree with any of it :) I
zeroed my levels in Ardour and recreated the mix from scratch, cleaning
up the EQ on the vocals and bass and bringing the vocals and drums to
the fore. Here's a direct link:
http://wootangent.net/~lsd/music/movealong-remix3.ogg
I'd love to know if you think it's an improvement, and if there's
anything further I could do to improve things.
Thanks
Leigh
On 30/04/11 16:16, Leigh Dyer wrote:
Hi all,
I've just finished work on a new track -- it's available for download or
streaming from my blog and from Bandcamp:
http://wootangent.net/2011/04/new-track-move-along/
http://pneuman.bandcamp.com/track/move-along
If you've heard any of my previous electronic works, this will seem
quite different -- it's just piano, bass, drums, and vocals. The
instruments are all soft-synths:
* Pianoteq for the piano sound (the K1 Grand)
* Linuxsampler CVS for drums, using an SFZ mapping of the RockStock kit
from Analogue Drums
* Fluidsynth-DSSI for the bass, using an SF2 file I dug up online
The parts were all sequenced in Qtractor, and then the audio was
recorded in to Ardour 3, along with the vocals, for mixing. I didn't go
crazy with plugins while mixing-- just compressors and filters/EQ (all
Calf), IR with a Bricasti M7 impulse response for reverb, and Rakarrack
with an Ampeg SVT-810 bass cabinet impulse response on the bass. It's
meant to sound like a simple, natural performance on real instruments,
and for the most part I think it achieves that well enough.
I also used the zita-at1 autotuner to do some subtle pitch correction on
the vocals. There were only a couple of notes that really needed
correction, so I turned off automatic correction (by disabling all of
the notes on the scale in the GUI) and then controlled it from a MIDI
track in Ardour, drawing in MIDI notes to trigger the correction just
where it was needed.
Thanks
Leigh
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
9:31 a.m.
2011/5/11 Leigh Dyer <lsd(a)wootangent.net>
I'd love to know if you think it's an improvement, and if there's anything
further I could do to improve things.
Much better. It's not my favourite style of music, so I can't make a
proper judgement. But anyway, it makes for a very entertaining listen. Great
job :-)
--
Roberto Suárez Soto
12 May
12 May
11:13 a.m.
On 11/05/11 17:31, Roberto Suárez Soto wrote:
2011/5/11 Leigh Dyer <lsd(a)wootangent.net
<mailto:lsd@wootangent.net>>
I'd love to know if you think it's an improvement, and if there's
anything further I could do to improve things.
Much better. It's not my favourite style of music, so I can't make
a proper judgement. But anyway, it makes for a very entertaining listen.
Great job :-)
Thanks :)
11 May
11 May
7:09 p.m.
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 08:56 +1000, Leigh Dyer wrote:
Hi all,
I took all your advice on board, and when listening back over the track
with your feedback in mind, I couldn't disagree with any of it :) I
zeroed my levels in Ardour and recreated the mix from scratch, cleaning
up the EQ on the vocals and bass and bringing the vocals and drums to
the fore. Here's a direct link:
http://wootangent.net/~lsd/music/movealong-remix3.ogg
I'd love to know if you think it's an improvement, and if there's
anything further I could do to improve things.
Thanks
Leigh
I really like this track. The mix is open and nothing gets lost.
You might consider doing some vocal exercises to strengthen it across
the higher notes as you sound a bit weak there. A few minutes a day will
do wonders in a short time.
As for the music itself, i enjoyed it. It reminded me quite a bit of
Porcupine Tree in its composition, albeit with out the strange time
signatures that they are known for.
--
Bearcat M. Şandor
Cell: 406.210.3500
Jabber/xmpp/gtalk/email: bearcat(a)feline-soul.net
MSN: bearcatsandor(a)hotmail.com
Yahoo: bearcatsandor
AIM: bearcatmsandor
12 May
12 May
11:18 a.m.
On 12/05/11 03:09, Bearcat M. Şandor wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 08:56 +1000, Leigh Dyer wrote:
Thanks :) I'll definitely check out Porcupine Tree -- I'm sure I've
heard the name before, but I've yet to listen to any of their work.
Do you (or anyone else) have links to some good online vocal exercises?
It's definitely something I'd like to improve, and something that I
think I could stand to spend a lot more time practising.
Thanks
Leigh
Hi all,
I took all your advice on board, and when listening back over the track
with your feedback in mind, I couldn't disagree with any of it :) I
zeroed my levels in Ardour and recreated the mix from scratch, cleaning
up the EQ on the vocals and bass and bringing the vocals and drums to
the fore. Here's a direct link:
http://wootangent.net/~lsd/music/movealong-remix3.ogg
I'd love to know if you think it's an improvement, and if there's
anything further I could do to improve things.
Thanks
Leigh
I really like this track. The mix is open and nothing gets lost.
You might consider doing some vocal exercises to strengthen it across
the higher notes as you sound a bit weak there. A few minutes a day will
do wonders in a short time.
As for the music itself, i enjoyed it. It reminded me quite a bit of
Porcupine Tree in its composition, albeit with out the strange time
signatures that they are known for.
8:57 a.m.
On 05/11/2011 12:56 AM, Leigh Dyer wrote:
Hi all,
I took all your advice on board, and when listening back over the track
with your feedback in mind, I couldn't disagree with any of it :) I
zeroed my levels in Ardour and recreated the mix from scratch, cleaning
up the EQ on the vocals and bass and bringing the vocals and drums to
the fore. Here's a direct link:
Quite good!
A little less lead vocal and a bit more drums and a bit more warmth in
the bass maybe.
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
11:22 a.m.
On 12/05/11 16:57, Atte André Jensen wrote:
On 05/11/2011 12:56 AM, Leigh Dyer wrote:
Thanks :) What would you use to add warmth to the bass? A tape/tube
saturation plugin or something along those lines?
Thanks
Leigh
Hi all,
I took all your advice on board, and when listening back over the track
with your feedback in mind, I couldn't disagree with any of it :) I
zeroed my levels in Ardour and recreated the mix from scratch, cleaning
up the EQ on the vocals and bass and bringing the vocals and drums to
the fore. Here's a direct link:
Quite good!
A little less lead vocal and a bit more drums and a bit more warmth in
the bass maybe.
11:36 a.m.
On 05/12/2011 11:21 AM, Leigh Dyer wrote:
Thanks :) What would you use to add warmth to the
bass? A tape/tube
saturation plugin or something along those lines?
EQ. Be gentle and careful not to introduce "omph"...
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
16 May
16 May
8:13 p.m.
On Wed, 11 May 2011 08:56:18 +1000
Leigh Dyer <lsd(a)wootangent.net> wrote:
Hi all,
I took all your advice on board, and when listening back over the track
with your feedback in mind, I couldn't disagree with any of it :) I
zeroed my levels in Ardour and recreated the mix from scratch, cleaning
up the EQ on the vocals and bass and bringing the vocals and drums to
the fore. Here's a direct link:
http://wootangent.net/~lsd/music/movealong-remix3.ogg
I'd love to know if you think it's an improvement, and if there's
anything further I could do to improve things.
Thanks
Leigh
Much better!
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
4728
days inactive
4744
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
22 comments
10 participants
participants (10)
-
Atte André Jensen -
Bearcat M. Şandor -
Cedric Roux -
Dave Phillips -
Folderol -
James Warden -
Julien Claassen -
Leigh Dyer -
Q -
Roberto Suárez Soto