On Tuesday 03 August 2004 05:13 pm, Aaron Trumm wrote:
"warm" means good low end :)
it is NOT true that EQ in the mix will fix problems created with your mic
selection - not at ALL - one of the obvious things is that you can never ad
back in what wasn't there to begin with, but there's more - better to spend
your money/effort on good and/or workable mics (and the accoustic
enviroment you're recording in) than on EQ and gadgets to "fix" it later -
you really can't fix a damn thing, honestly
now then - I probably wouldn't use a 58 (or knock off) on hand drums - I
Sennheiser 421
would use a 57 though - as far as female vocals
AKG 414
a nice solid condensor is good - I have a Cascade MT20
that I use like i
would use a u47 if I had one - it's about 400 dollars - AKG 414s get used a
eheh
lot on vocals, they are about 1000 - AKG makes (or
made) a tube version of
the 414 - that's a great mic but I found it a little sibilant and harsh on
some female vocals
madonna uses a 57 for her vocals
-------
NQuit
www.nquit.com
-------
----- Original Message -----
From: Alastair Couper
Sent: 8/3/2004 2:43:47 PM
To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
Subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: OT: Microphone info
> Yes, I should state the intention. I have a SM58 knockoff (by Fender)
> that I use on hand drums. My interest de jeur is to record a female
> vocalist.
>
> I am an electrical engineer by education, so am amenable to freq charts,
> THD, spatial plots and such. But the "warm" thing seems to me empty.
> Seems like judicious EQ should get you what you want, given that the
> transducer is coming up with a clean reproduction to begin with. But then
> one gets into subjectivity and black magic again.
>
> I am looking a Studio Projects B1, for instance.