17 Sep
2005
17 Sep
'05
10:12 p.m.
http://www.mjoo.org/index.php/Downloads
µ is a new kind of live composition software, introducing radical new
user interface concepts. It is currently in alpha stage. Its initial
feature is to act as a mixer application for jack.
18 Sep
18 Sep
12:01 a.m.
Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote:
http://www.mjoo.org/index.php/Downloads
µ is a new kind of live composition software, introducing radical new
user interface concepts. It is currently in alpha stage. Its initial
feature is to act as a mixer application for jack.
thanks, leonard..... this looks like one of the most interesting
projects i've seen in a long time!
i look forward to its further development.
5:26 a.m.
Hallo,
Leonard paniq Ritter hat gesagt: // Leonard paniq Ritter wrote:
http://www.mjoo.org/index.php/Downloads
µ is a new kind of live composition software, introducing radical new
user interface concepts. It is currently in alpha stage. Its initial
feature is to act as a mixer application for jack.
This is really nice.
However I don't think it's *that* radical. The Xennakis' UPIC and
Puckette's Pd (1) use "innovative" graphical user interface elements
as well. Although these two programs have a different focus anyway.
(1) http://www-crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Pd_documentation/x2.htm#s9
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
9:41 a.m.
i think, that, just because something else is radical as well (as in the
sense of "scrap what we know, develop a new interface from scratch"),
that doesn't mean its not possible to develop many concurrent interfaces
from scratch.
On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 09:22 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
However I don't think it's *that* radical. The
Xennakis' UPIC and
Puckette's Pd (1) use "innovative" graphical user interface elements
as well. Although these two programs have a different focus anyway.
(1) http://www-crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Pd_documentation/x2.htm#s9
Ciao
11:53 a.m.
Hallo,
Leonard paniq Ritter hat gesagt: // Leonard paniq Ritter wrote:
i think, that, just because something else is radical
as well (as in the
sense of "scrap what we know, develop a new interface from scratch"),
that doesn't mean its not possible to develop many concurrent interfaces
from scratch.
Surely not!
I just wanted to mention some other software which also tries to
explore new user interface concepts for music software as well.
Somehow like encouraging you to "scrap what we know, develop a new
interface from scratch ... while also taking a look at what has been
done in that area before" ;)
I guess we both agree that there is life after Cubase. There even was
a life before, which continues to prosper.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
3:22 p.m.
On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 15:49 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I just wanted to mention some other software which
also tries to
explore new user interface concepts for music software as well.
Somehow like encouraging you to "scrap what we know, develop a new
interface from scratch ... while also taking a look at what has been
done in that area before" ;)
don't know about the others but i'm well aware of pd. my first project
for win32 has been strongly oriented on pd and max/msp. when it reached
beta level, i started using it and realized that this was actually not
what i wanted.
there is a longer article on my blog about the reasons for the switch,
if you are interested.
http://blog.paniq.org/?p=2
-- leonard "paniq" ritter
-- http://www.mjoo.org
-- http://www.paniq.org
6809
days inactive
6810
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Frank Barknecht -
Leonard "paniq" Ritter -
Peter Lutek