11 Dec
2007
11 Dec
'07
9:34 a.m.
Rosegarden and Muse, probably using the same code, kick about numerous ladspa
plugins missing headers--are you sure this is a ladspa plugin?
Freecycle, on the other hand, simply polls and loads them all up with nary a
burp. (My local compiled version does segfault afterwards but that is another
issue.)
If they are good for the goose, why not the gander (honk!)?
11 Dec
11 Dec
10:09 a.m.
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 13:34, David Baron wrote:
Rosegarden and Muse, probably using the same code,
kick about
numerous ladspa plugins missing headers--are you sure this is a
ladspa plugin?
I don't think I know what you mean. What plugins, and what complaints?
Chris
10:18 a.m.
On Dec 11, 2007 3:34 PM, David Baron <d_baron(a)012.net.il> wrote:
Rosegarden and Muse, probably using the same code,
kick about numerous ladspa
plugins missing headers--are you sure this is a ladspa plugin?
I honestly thought the subject was "Ladspa scamming" at first. What
will they think of next?
I pay no attention to that man behind the curtain when I use
Rosegarden or Muse; I get so many warnings from both that I figure
it's part of the territory. I haven't had any trouble with things not
working yet. Well not since I learned how to configure Linux audio,
that is.
-Chuckk
--
http://www.badmuthahubbard.com
6194
days inactive
6194
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Chris Cannam -
Chuckk Hubbard -
David Baron