I'm not in front of my linux box with my audigy2, but from what I

later, Steve On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:10:55PM +0700, Khadiyd Idris wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Thanks for info, >Can I record at least at 24bit/92 using Audigy2? > >Stephen Hassard wrote: >| Audigy2 has faily decent all around linux support with Alsa, although >I don't think you'll get at 24bit x 192khz i/o. It'll basically act as a >Live! w/ really nice DACs :P >| >| later, >| Steve >| >| On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:10:36PM +0700, Khadiyd Idris wrote: >| >|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >|>Hash: SHA1 >|> >|>I'm looking for inexpensive soundcard but with high quality... for >|>recording dan monitoring >|> >|>I found two candidates: >|>- - Soundtrack DSP24 (seems hard to find it in local store) >|>- - SB Audigy 2 >|> >|>Can some1 share experience on these two soundcard in linux... >|> >

torsdagen den 19 juni 2003 13.06 skrev Khadiyd Idris: Hi, I really shouldn't comment about the Audigy 2, but I don't think the difference isn't that big from the Audigy. What I do remember about the audigy was that a lot of people shouted

it came to Creative's adverts. As I recall the original Audigy was also advertised as 24bit, which later was proven a marketing stunt. Now, to be truthful, If those extra bits really mean anything to you,

probably means you have reeeealy expensive equipment for the rest of the signal chain. Then you should probably buy a more expensive soundcard anyway. Any of the envy24 based cards and/or the Hammerfall cards would do

/Robert