12 Feb
2006
12 Feb
'06
9:51 p.m.
fons adriaensen:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:03:52PM -0500, Lee Revell
wrote:
Yes.
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:45 -0800, Kjetil S.
Matheussen wrote:
Is it really ? That is rediculous. Do you really have to start
program that way
to get realtime priority? In case, I guess (and _really_ hope)
that realtime-lsm (or something similar) will continue to exist for a
long time still.
Yes, absolutely, it is ridiculous. If you start apps via an icon or menu, you
don't see any difference at all.
You're right. But it has to be set up, and many/most of us would never
use an icon or a menu to start most programs.
If you use a terminal
to start them, just define an alias.
No no no. Thats even worse. :-(
Having a prefix such
as nice, sudo, or rt_limits -r is not really worse than
having options (IMHO).
A program should just work. If the nature of the program is
that some threads need to run realtime, those threads shall
also run realtime by default.
What you are proposing is the complete opposite.
12 Feb
12 Feb
10:13 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] 2.6.15.4, realtime-lsm, jackd -R,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 05:51:17PM -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Why ? Don't you ever use 'la' ? It's an alias for 'ls -la'.
To hide this sort of details is why they exist...
--
FA
If you use a
terminal
to start them, just define an alias.
No no no. Thats even worse. :-(
10:27 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] 2.6.15.4, realtime-lsm, jackd -R,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, fons adriaensen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 05:51:17PM -0800, Kjetil S.
Matheussen wrote:
Why ? Don't you ever use 'la' ? It's an alias for 'ls -la'.
To hide this sort of details is why they exist...
Okey, you're right. :-)
I don't think its worse, but its still very bad.
If you
use a terminal
to start them, just define an alias.
No no no. Thats even worse. :-(
6919
days inactive
6919
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
fons adriaensen -
Kjetil S. Matheussen