22 Nov
2014
22 Nov
'14
5:36 p.m.
Sorry this is in german:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bund-unterstuetzt-digitales-Klangerl…
Kind regards,
Uli
22 Nov
22 Nov
6:03 p.m.
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 18:35:58 +0100
Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter <audiomobster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry this is in german:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bund-unterstuetzt-digitales-Klangerl…
Summary: The Federal Government granted support money, if organisers
drop their analog audio gear and replace it with digital audio gear.
They claim it does improve the infrastructure and an association of
club owners claims that it is very important to encourage to drop
analog gear and to switch to digital gear. There's no statement of
reasons. I'm interested in the reasons of expediency. IMO there is no
rational reason to encourage to do this. Without any argument for doing
this, it's just schizophren to encourage to do it.
9:41 p.m.
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 18:35:58 +0100
Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter <audiomobster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So what do they use in place of mics and speakers? Or voices and vibrating
strings/skins/etc. for that matter. I am guessing it is a power bill
thing. Class D amps (which are not truely digital anyway) can use much
less power than B. They all have analog pathways though. There is really
no such thing as digital audio gear in terms of preamp, power amp Class D
amps are just switching power supplies that have an analog feedback loop.
It is possible to create the digital control for class D but if there is
no correction via analog paths, the audio is not the same as what goes in.
--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
Sorry this is in german:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bund-unterstuetzt-digitales-Klangerl…
Summary: The Federal Government granted support money, if organisers
drop their analog audio gear and replace it with digital audio gear.
They claim it does improve the infrastructure and an association of
club owners claims that it is very important to encourage to drop
analog gear and to switch to digital gear. There's no statement of
reasons. I'm interested in the reasons of expediency. IMO there is no
rational reason to encourage to do this. Without any argument for doing
this, it's just schizophren to encourage to do it.
9:56 p.m.
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:37:35 -0800 (PST)
Len Ovens <len(a)ovenwerks.net> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
They simply should use half of the amps they're using in an averaged
German Club yet. This wouldn't just reduce the power consumption, it
also would prevent sickness insurance to bear the cost caused by all
the musically sensitive young people.
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 18:35:58 +0100
Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter <audiomobster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So what do they use in place of mics and speakers? Or voices and
vibrating strings/skins/etc. for that matter. I am guessing it is a
power bill thing. Class D amps (which are not truely digital anyway)
can use much less power than B. They all have analog pathways though.
There is really no such thing as digital audio gear in terms of
preamp, power amp Class D amps are just switching power supplies that
have an analog feedback loop. It is possible to create the digital
control for class D but if there is no correction via analog paths,
the audio is not the same as what goes in. Sorry this is in german:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bund-unterstuetzt-digitales-Klangerl…
Summary: The Federal Government granted support money, if organisers
drop their analog audio gear and replace it with digital audio gear.
They claim it does improve the infrastructure and an association of
club owners claims that it is very important to encourage to drop
analog gear and to switch to digital gear. There's no statement of
reasons. I'm interested in the reasons of expediency. IMO there is
no rational reason to encourage to do this. Without any argument
for doing this, it's just schizophren to encourage to do it. 
23 Nov
23 Nov
3:30 p.m.
On 2014-11-22 21:37, Len Ovens wrote:
So what do they use in place of mics and speakers? Or
voices and
vibrating strings/skins/etc.
"Good news everyone!!! We have found a way to replace them egocentric
diva-singers with obedient robots!"
hahah!! :D
--
Set Hallstrom
AKA Sakrecoer
http://sakrecoer.com
3:44 p.m.
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:30:34 +0100
Set Hallstrom <sakrecoer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2014-11-22 21:37, Len Ovens wrote:
Bad news, you're mistaken, it will get worse with robots
http://theinfosphere.org/Hedonismbot .
So what do they use in place of mics and
speakers? Or voices and
vibrating strings/skins/etc.
"Good news everyone!!! We have found a way to replace them egocentric
diva-singers with obedient robots!"
hahah!! :D
3:27 p.m.
On 2014-11-22 18:02, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I'm interested in the reasons of expediency. IMO
there is no
rational reason to encourage to do this. Without any argument for doing
this, it's just schizophren to encourage to do it.
My guess is the following: like the "digital TV-box" and the blackout of
analog TV/Radio-transmition, this type of program is great way to
increase consumerism, in those areas of the economy where no-one finds a
need to buy new stuff.
--
Set Hallstrom
3609
days inactive
3610
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Len Ovens -
Ralf Mardorf -
Set Hallstrom -
Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter