On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 06:45 -0800, Louis Gorenfeld wrote: I'm not sure if this really is OT, since for me it isn't. Linux audio is about freedom and a harmless default wallpaper about something from a creative commons music community inflame passions of some Linux users. Why? It's free from porn, showing a virtual "school girl" singer. And other wallpapers are more professional, just because this default wallpaper does show a "school girl"? Why should there be copy right issues? The idea of creative commons is to avoid copyright issues. http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/35879 For me it's very strange that it's classified as porn. It doesn't fit to my taste, there is some commercial background, but it's about creative commons music and free from porn. Even the minimal erotic is that harmless, that in Germany you're allowed to show this picture in a kindergarten or elementary school. Most default wallpapers I've seen are much more worse, completely without erotic, but instead of that unskilled art, that I would protect children against those unaesthetic wallpapers. Regards, Ralf