13 Mar
2006
13 Mar
'06
3:20 p.m.
----- Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com> wrote:
Over here in Thailand many DJ's have final scratch
and use 300kb mp3s
for an entire set, I hear it's happening more in Europe and the US
too.
I would lean towards FLAC files for performance on large PA systems, though I don't
know the CPU benchmarks for decoding FLAC versus extremely high bitrate mp3. I have a
feeling decoding vorbis needs more CPU than either.
Part of the specs require adding midi cc support to
jackEQ.
How do you feel about QAmix? It controls the sound card's hardware, therefore you get
all the advantages of ALSA's hardware support. With a Delta 1010LT this gives lots of
options. Obviously MIDI control on a software mixer like jackEQ would have even more
possibilities but I wouldn't want to ignore the option of hardware mixer control via
MIDI.
-lee
13 Mar
13 Mar
3:35 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: dj-ing hardware under Linux
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:20 -0500, Lee A. Azzarello wrote:
----- Patrick Shirkey
<pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com> wrote:
Shouldn't MIDI control be integrated at the toolkit level (GTK/QT)
rather than having to do it in every app?
Lee
Over here in Thailand many DJ's have final
scratch and use 300kb mp3s
for an entire set, I hear it's happening more in Europe and the US
too.
I would lean towards FLAC files for performance on large PA systems, though I don't
know the CPU benchmarks for decoding FLAC versus extremely high bitrate mp3. I have a
feeling decoding vorbis needs more CPU than either.
Part of the specs require adding midi cc support
to jackEQ.
How do you feel about QAmix? It controls the sound card's hardware, therefore you get
all the advantages of ALSA's hardware support. With a Delta 1010LT this gives lots of
options. Obviously MIDI control on a software mixer like jackEQ would have even more
possibilities but I wouldn't want to ignore the option of hardware mixer control via
MIDI.
3:55 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: dj-ing hardware under Linux
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:35 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
Shouldn't MIDI control be integrated at the
toolkit level (GTK/QT)
rather than having to do it in every app?
why MIDI? why not OSC? why not HID ? why not serial control ?
4:03 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: dj-ing hardware under Linux
Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:35 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
Are you volunteering :)
Mmmmm, a complete library for hardware control with any gui toolkit...
--
Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd.
Http://www.boosthardware.com
Http://www.djcj.org/LAU/guide/ - The Linux Audio Users guide
========================================
Apparently upon the beginning of the barrage, the donkey broke
discipline and panicked, toppling the cart. At that point, the rockets
disconnected from the timer, leaving them strewn around the street.
Tethered to the now toppled cart, the donkey was unable to escape before
the arrival of U.S. troops.
United Press International
Rockets on donkeys hit major Baghdad sites
By P. MITCHELL PROTHERO
Published 11/21/2003 11:13 AM
Shouldn't MIDI control be integrated at the
toolkit level (GTK/QT)
rather than having to do it in every app?
why MIDI? why not OSC? why not HID ? why not serial control ?
4:16 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: dj-ing hardware under Linux
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 14:03 +0900, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Mmmmm, a complete library for hardware control with
any gui toolkit...
Well I think you might need an implementation for each toolkit which
seems like a much more manageable problem anyway. There are at most 5
important toolkits.
Lee
4:14 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: dj-ing hardware under Linux
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:59 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:35 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
Exactly. Shouldn't all this live at the toolkit level?
Lee
Shouldn't MIDI control be integrated at the
toolkit level (GTK/QT)
rather than having to do it in every app?
why MIDI? why not OSC? why not HID ? why not serial control ?
4:17 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: dj-ing hardware under Linux
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:14 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:59 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
that doesn't scale properly.
LAC2005 had a paper on integrating MIDI into any X application. Slightly
clunky but pretty cool. doing this via low-level X stuff scales much
better than expecting toolkit Foo (for all values of Foo) to provide a
MIDI interface plugin.
--p
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:35 -0500, Lee Revell
wrote:
Exactly. Shouldn't all this live at the toolkit level? Shouldn't MIDI control be integrated at the
toolkit level (GTK/QT)
rather than having to do it in every app?
why MIDI? why not OSC? why not HID ? why not serial control ?
4:08 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: dj-ing hardware under Linux
Lee A. Azzarello wrote:
It's a good app but it's designed for hardware volume, etc controls
isn't it?
It's not really the same thing as mixing multiple streams from disc.
Although it is useful for multichannel playback/recording I'm sure.
--
Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd.
Http://www.boosthardware.com
Http://www.djcj.org/LAU/guide/ - The Linux Audio Users guide
========================================
Apparently upon the beginning of the barrage, the donkey broke
discipline and panicked, toppling the cart. At that point, the rockets
disconnected from the timer, leaving them strewn around the street.
Tethered to the now toppled cart, the donkey was unable to escape before
the arrival of U.S. troops.
United Press International
Rockets on donkeys hit major Baghdad sites
By P. MITCHELL PROTHERO
Published 11/21/2003 11:13 AM
----- Patrick Shirkey
<pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com> wrote:
I have no objection to FLAC but most DJs I know use 300kbs mp3 and
that's quite a few...
Over here in Thailand many DJ's have final
scratch and use 300kb mp3s
for an entire set, I hear it's happening more in Europe and the US
too.
I would lean towards FLAC files for performance on large PA systems, though I don't
know the CPU benchmarks for decoding FLAC versus extremely high bitrate mp3. I have a
feeling decoding vorbis needs more CPU than either.
Part of the
specs require adding midi cc support to jackEQ.
How do you feel about QAmix? It controls the sound card's hardware, therefore you get
all the advantages of ALSA's hardware support. With a Delta 1010LT this gives lots of
options. Obviously MIDI control on a software mixer like jackEQ would have even more
possibilities but I wouldn't want to ignore the option of hardware mixer control via
MIDI.
4:23 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: dj-ing hardware under Linux
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>> Part of the specs require adding midi cc
support to jackEQ.
For those who might be interested I have successfully tested 4 tracks
streaming from a usb flash drive at a buffer of 128 with jackeq, 4
alsaplayers and jackrack running at the same time while also using a
multi channel usb soundcard. It was stable and the sound was clear.
I wasn't able to do it until I got a new mobo/cpu: 2.6Ghz pIV, asus
microboard.
The next step is to add hardware controls via midi or whatever protocol
is recomended as the most efficient...
BTW, Does anyone know how much overhead MIDI or the other protocols add
to a system running at low latency?
Cheers.
--
Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd.
Http://www.boosthardware.com
Http://www.djcj.org/LAU/guide/ - The Linux Audio Users guide
========================================
Apparently upon the beginning of the barrage, the donkey broke
discipline and panicked, toppling the cart. At that point, the rockets
disconnected from the timer, leaving them strewn around the street.
Tethered to the now toppled cart, the donkey was unable to escape before
the arrival of U.S. troops.
United Press International
Rockets on donkeys hit major Baghdad sites
By P. MITCHELL PROTHERO
Published 11/21/2003 11:13 AM
6832
days inactive
6832
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
8 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Lee A. Azzarello -
Lee Revell -
Patrick Shirkey -
Paul Davis