29 Mar
2005
29 Mar
'05
12:11 p.m.
--- Jan Depner <eviltwin69(a)cableone.net> wrote:
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 00:22, e. j. branagan - the
MUSE wrote:
shelving controls, and as
And what problem does six parametric bands solve
during mastering? Same qustion for more compression
bands. If your audio is so screwed up to require that
type of toolset then shit can it and start over.
Seriously, you don't have a mastering problem you have
recording and mixing problems.
Please sexcuse me but I feel forced to ask, why not
put a dork port on JAMin so I can stop spending my
money in cat houses?
ron
Jan Depner wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 18:52, Aaron Trumm wrote:
>
>
>>>Mostly positive, and the inevitable requests
for more features ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>yeah, like five bands - I bet everyone wants
five bands, DON'T they?
*waves
>>a watch in front of your
face*....five...bands....
>>
>>
>>
>
> Actually I'm planning on going to 4
parametric controls in addition
to the 2
shelving controls.
Jan
Why limit things like this? Why not optional many parametric bands as we want? And as many
compression bands as we want?
Look at the code. This is not trivial,
especially considering that
all of the parametric data must be saved and allow
undo. Also, look at
the screen real estate. We've been trying to avoid
bloatware. If you
look at the competing commercial offerings I don't
believe any of them
have 6 parametric controls. I also don't recall any
with more than
three bands of compression. Jan
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT
Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype.
Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jamin-devel mailing list
Jamin-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jamin-devel
29 Mar
29 Mar
1:09 p.m.
New subject: [Jamin] Re: [linux-audio-user] repost: curious about jamin feedback
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 09:11, R Parker wrote:
And what problem does six parametric bands solve
during mastering? Same qustion for more compression
bands. If your audio is so screwed up to require that
type of toolset then shit can it and start over.
Seriously, you don't have a mastering problem you have
recording and mixing problems.
Wait now, you're the one that thought it would be a good idea to add
meterbridge to JAMin. You just posted that yesterday. Actually, when I
use JAMin I often find myself needing just one more parametric EQ.
Granted, I can draw any curve I want and get the same effect but I can't
slide it to exactly the right place. There are still a couple of
features that would be nice in JAMin. Direct out to .wav files has been
mentioned a number of times. In fact I think you're one of the
proponents of that. Steve wants to add warning lights for DC offset.
I'd like to have small delays available for low and mid band. It's
still a mastering tool and we haven't added anything that is not useful
for mastering.
Jan
2:39 p.m.
New subject: [Jamin] Re: [linux-audio-user] repost: curious about jamin feedback
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:16:06AM -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I'd like to have small delays available for low
and mid band. It's
still a mastering tool and we haven't added anything that is not useful
for mastering.
Jan
On reading the Sonic Maximizer docs, it seems like this is mostly
suggested for live sound reinforcement. When using it for
mastering a record, i suppose the engineer is operating under the
assumption that the final playback equipment has the same phase
dificiencies as the P.A. loudspeakers the docs mention? Doesn't
this do a disservice to listeners that have good equipment?
(This isn't an argument against including the option in Jamin,
but simply my own selfish desire to learn more about mastering)
-spencer
2:52 p.m.
New subject: [Jamin] Re: [linux-audio-user] repost: curious about jamin feedback
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 23:45, Spencer Russell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:16:06AM -0600, Jan Depner
wrote:
If you poll the public you'll find that 99.9% don't have good
equipment. I tend to master for those with boom boxes, ipods, crappy
car stereos, WalMart stereos, etc. I'm not in the audiophile market.
Jan
I'd like to have small delays available for
low and mid band. It's
still a mastering tool and we haven't added anything that is not useful
for mastering.
Jan
On reading the Sonic Maximizer docs, it seems like this is mostly
suggested for live sound reinforcement. When using it for
mastering a record, i suppose the engineer is operating under the
assumption that the final playback equipment has the same phase
dificiencies as the P.A. loudspeakers the docs mention? Doesn't
this do a disservice to listeners that have good equipment?
7181
days inactive
7181
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jan Depner -
R Parker -
Spencer Russell