16 Feb
2010
16 Feb
'10
9:14 p.m.
Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:19 PM, james morris
<james(a)jwm-art.net> wrote:
Just noticed that recently, myself.
My guess is JACK probably *does* meet their notability standards, but
the article would need to contain references to outside web sites
mentioning JACK. Perhaps something like the open source award given
to Paul a few years back...
http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-5136755.html
--
joq
I added a note (and the ref to the TechRepublic article) to the Wikipedia
page. Thanks for pointing it out!
Nick
16 Feb
16 Feb
9:46 p.m.
New subject: wikipedia: jack may not meet notability
Excerpts from Nick Dokos's message of 2010-02-17 02:13:41 +0100:
Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The list of software that works with jack is really short and quite
random.
The mention of aRts seems to be a bit off to me, I see no real relation.
The text in general could be improved, especially the part about the
rename of jackdmp to jack2 doesn't look very English to me...
The stable release version there is the one of jack2. Afaik jack1 and
jack2 are quite different and jack2 doesn't really replace jack1.
Also jack2 is written in C++, so the note there is wrong.
I'm sure there's lots of stuff that could be added, the notability
thing really is a joke..
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:19 PM, james morris
<james(a)jwm-art.net> wrote:
Just noticed that recently, myself.
My guess is JACK probably *does* meet their notability standards, but
the article would need to contain references to outside web sites
mentioning JACK. Perhaps something like the open source award given
to Paul a few years back...
http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-5136755.html
--
joq
I added a note (and the ref to the TechRepublic article) to the Wikipedia
page. Thanks for pointing it out!
Nick
17 Feb
17 Feb
2:50 a.m.
New subject: wikipedia: jack may not meet notability
hollunder wrote:
Excerpts from Nick Dokos's message of 2010-02-17
02:13:41 +0100:
Well, jack2 replaced jack1 here and a pile of difficulties disappeared. ;-)
Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
The list of software that works with jack is really short and quite
random.
The mention of aRts seems to be a bit off to me, I see no real relation.
The text in general could be improved, especially the part about the
rename of jackdmp to jack2 doesn't look very English to me...
The stable release version there is the one of jack2. Afaik jack1 and
jack2 are quite different and jack2 doesn't really replace jack1.
Also jack2 is written in C++, so the note there is wrong. On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:19 PM, james morris
<james(a)jwm-art.net> wrote:
Just noticed that recently,
myself.
My guess is JACK probably *does* meet their notability standards, but
the article would need to contain references to outside web sites
mentioning JACK. Perhaps something like the open source award given
to Paul a few years back...
http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-5136755.html
--
joq
I added a note (and the ref to the TechRepublic article) to the Wikipedia
page. Thanks for pointing it out!
Nick
I'm sure there's lots of stuff that could be
added, the notability
thing really is a joke..
Notability by the lights of someone who doesn't do Linux audio at all:
"JACK? What's that? Never heard of it, can't possibly be notable." ;-)
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
5:32 a.m.
New subject: wikipedia: jack may not meet notability
I'm sure there's lots of stuff that could
be added, the notability
thing really is a joke..
5395
days inactive
5396
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
david -
hollunder -
michael noble -
Nick Dokos