21 Dec
2003
21 Dec
'03
10:26 p.m.
Hi,
i wonder about how ready linux 2.6.0 is for audio stuff? Is vanilla
2.6.0 with preemtion enabled comparable to 2.4.22 with preemption +
andrew's LowLatency patches [which i use right now]?
I somewhere read something about merging andrews LL and the preemptible
patches. Is there any truth to that?
What about the 2.4.x capabilities "patch"? Will this work on 2.6.x?
Flo
--
music: http://www.soundclick.com/bands/9/florianschmidt.htm
21 Dec
21 Dec
11:40 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] low latency 2.4.x -> 2.6.x
Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas(a)gmx.net> writes:
i wonder about how ready linux 2.6.0 is for audio
stuff? Is vanilla
2.6.0 with preemtion enabled comparable to 2.4.22 with preemption +
andrew's LowLatency patches [which i use right now]?
On my system, the vanilla 2.6 with preemption is usable for audio, but
nowhere near as good at low latencies as a properly patched and tuned
2.4 kernel.
I somewhere read something about merging andrews LL
and the preemptible
patches. Is there any truth to that?
We all hope so.
What about the 2.4.x capabilities "patch"?
Will this work on 2.6.x?
Yes, I think it will. But, 2.6 provides a mechanism for doing this as
a kernel module with no patches required. Here is an experimental
module I built based on earlier work done by Torben Hohn...
http://www.joq.us/realtime/realtime-0.0.2.tar.gz
--
joq
22 Dec
22 Dec
7:54 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] low latency 2.4.x -> 2.6.x
On 21 Dec 2003 21:38:35 -0600
"Jack O'Quin" <joq(a)io.com> wrote:
Hmm, maybe i'll drop andrew an email to see what his thoughts and plans
on the issue are..
Okay :) I will try it..
Thanks for the infos..
--
music: http://www.soundclick.com/bands/9/florianschmidt.htm
On my system, the vanilla 2.6 with preemption is
usable for audio, but
nowhere near as good at low latencies as a properly patched and tuned
2.4 kernel.
Ok, i will give it a shot to see how it goes..
I somewhere read something about merging andrews
LL and the
preemptible patches. Is there any truth to that?
We all hope so. What about the 2.4.x capabilities
"patch"? Will this work on 2.6.x?
Yes, I think it will. But, 2.6 provides a mechanism for doing this as
a kernel module with no patches required. Here is an experimental
module I built based on earlier work done by Torben Hohn...
http://www.joq.us/realtime/realtime-0.0.2.tar.gz
7696
days inactive
7697
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Florian Schmidt -
Jack O'Quin