On Sunday 29 October 2006 22:23, chaz kiser wrote: I'm no recording engineer, but I've worked with one in the last few years and I think I have a little bit of understanding of what sounds good and what doesn't now. First of all, I assume you're not trying to record your vocals on a $5 microphone that came with your computer and that you're recording somewhere that doesn't have awful acoustics. I've recorded in a closet, in a car, under a blanket and a number of other ways due to being unable to just put up acoustic foam in the apartments I've lived in. I also learned that all the cliches about "sing from the diaphragm", "don't swallow the mic", etc. are pretty much true, at least if you're trying to record something that sounds like popular music. After you're done recording, conventional approaches to fixing vocals include compression and EQ, various "aural exciters", which range from expensive snake oil to useful, and nowadays pitch correction (like Antares Autotune) especially. I don't think there's a way to automatically correct sharp or flat vocals in Audacity though (yet.) I used something a lot cheaper than Autotune back in my Windows days, but can't remember what it was called and I don't know whether there are any Autotune clones that would work under Linux. But you should be able to fix especially out-of-tune notes by either punching in from another recording (which I usually do) or selecting just that note and manually shifting the pitch through one of Audacity's time/pitch plugins. A common mistake (or artistic decision I would disagree with) that I hear in people's stuff that they post to the net is leaving the vocals too dry when the whole rest of the track has a ton of effects. Doubling the vocal track (recording it a second time in unison) or using chorus or delay, and then applying a reverb sound that's appropriate to the rest of the track, will usually help. Use your discretion.... if it's a really electronic sounding track, you can take a lot more liberties (flange, gate, phaser, vocoder...) than if you're recording a "folk singer/songwriter" kind of track, but I think there aren't a lot of situations where you want to leave the vocal track totally dry. Finally, people who aren't confident in their own vocal ability and who mix their own music tend to mix themselves way too far back, even when the vocal or lyrics is what they want you to notice. I personally think it's better to have the vocal overcooked than inaudible. As far as making yourself sound like someone else.... you can try tricks like slowing down your track, recording your vocals and speeding it back up (or vice versa), you can try analyzing the spectrum of the person you want to imitate's vocals and EQ'ing yourself to sound like him or her, but in the end there's more to someone's voice than just the timbre. There are articles about how to record better sounding vocals in the musician magazines almost every month, and I'm sure there are hundreds of them around the net, but these are my opinions. Rob

My first thought was: Get someone else to sing them My second thought was: Take singing lessons

Any suggestions what plugins or effects in Audacity I could utilize to make my vocals sound better, or more importantly, like someone else?

Dave Phillips wrote: Good suggestion if he wanted to sound like a certain person. Unfortunately as far as I understand it he want's to *not* sound like a certain person.