Den Friday 30 November 2007 09.41.38 skrev Arnold Krille:
Am Freitag, 30. November 2007 schrieb Tomas Valusek:
thanks for your answers, but I need to teech
sequencing, therefore I
need to use something sighted pupils can use as well, and it should be a
"typical" sequencer. I actually use Lilypond for writing notation.
Why do you want your lecture to focus on the tool instead of the task (and
ways of solution)?
I think you are making wrong assumptions here. He want a "typical" sequencer.
For me, as a occasional teacher, I interpret that as "I need a tool to go
from theory to practice". If that is Cisco/Linux/Volvo/Samsung/wrench or what
ever it doesn't matter as long as you have been thorough in your theory
teaching.
I mean the "most important" argument[*] for
not switching to free software
is always "I am used to this and that, relearning is far to much time". And
that is because people learn to use tools but not to solve tasks with
whatever tool is available.
I could be your lecture gets even better if you and your pupils use two or
three different sequencers and all achieve the same thing and maybe even
all can be synced together...
I some times lecture in computer networks at royal institute of technology in
Stockholm. The problem is not to show students the principals of the task but
to make useful laborations. For that you often need a specific tool.
Different tools takes up huge amount of preparation time. I do use
Cisco/Juniper/"Linux-PC with Quagga" to teach in OSPF/ISIS/BGP. One
laboration may take weeks to construct. It's not getting any easier if you
have 3-4 platforms.
regards,
/bengan