16 Nov
2014
16 Nov
'14
4:54 p.m.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 08:56:37AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
you'll find more discussion here;
https://community.ardour.org/node/8496
Ah, hmm. It seems maybe this isn't the
disaster it seemed. I had a memory
that VST support on Linux was shaky and on dodgy legal footing, but perhaps
it's moved on or I've had the wrong end of the stick.
fairly sure that he was referring to this post:
https://community.ardour.org/node/8288
My subscription lapsed a while back and
there were some problems getting
it set up again for some reason I forget. At the time I have up but the long
and short of it though is that I *should* be subscribing and so I've tried
again and it seems to be working now.
bjb
16 Nov
16 Nov
5 p.m.
New subject: linuxDSP switch to OverTone
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Ben Bell <bjb-linux-audio-user(a)deus.net>
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 08:56:37AM -0500, Paul Davis
wrote:
*Windows* VST on Linux is shaky and dodgy (requires Wine and special
compile of Ardour). I've verified that *Linux* VST (which are natively
compiled plugins like LV2) can be used without issue in some hosts, like
Ardour. I think they may work in MixBus also (not 100% sure on that, maybe
in the upcoming Mixbus3)
--
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it
would overturn the world."
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
you'll find more discussion here;
https://community.ardour.org/node/8496
Ah, hmm. It seems maybe this isn't the
disaster it seemed. I had a memory
that VST support on Linux was shaky and on dodgy legal footing, but perhaps
it's moved on or I've had the wrong end of the stick.
17 Nov
17 Nov
4:40 p.m.
New subject: linuxDSP switch to OverTone
Quoting Ben Bell <bjb-linux-audio-user(a)deus.net>et>:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 08:56:37AM -0500, Paul Davis
wrote:
The "dodgy legal footing" was probably the clash in licensing between
the GPL and Steinberger's VST SDK license which made people unable to
legally distribute VST-enabled linux binaries.
When the VeSTige reverse-engineered VST headers were released that
particular problem went away.
- Peder
you'll find more discussion here;
https://community.ardour.org/node/8496
Ah, hmm. It seems maybe this isn't the
disaster it seemed. I had a memory
that VST support on Linux was shaky and on dodgy legal footing, but perhaps
it's moved on or I've had the wrong end of the stick. 
18 Nov
18 Nov
12:53 a.m.
New subject: linuxDSP switch to OverTone
On November 17, 2014 05:40:38 PM Peder Hedlund wrote:
Quoting Ben Bell
<bjb-linux-audio-user(a)deus.net>et>:
But there's still a problem here.
The vestige header is far from complete. For example it is missing several
flag definitions and some features that are found in the real header.
At what point would this header be completed - that is if it /can/ be legally?
What is the legality of using missing flag 'numbers' but with your own
flag names? Does it matter? Or no names at all, just the hard-coded numbers?
T.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 08:56:37AM -0500, Paul
Davis wrote:
The "dodgy legal footing" was probably the clash in licensing between
the GPL and Steinberger's VST SDK license which made people unable to
legally distribute VST-enabled linux binaries.
When the VeSTige reverse-engineered VST headers were released that
particular problem went away.
- Peder you'll find more discussion here;
https://community.ardour.org/node/8496
Ah, hmm. It seems maybe this isn't the disaster it seemed. I had a memory
that VST support on Linux was shaky and on dodgy legal footing, but
perhaps
it's moved on or I've had the wrong end of the stick.
3810
days inactive
3812
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Ben Bell -
Brett McCoy -
Peder Hedlund -
Tim E. Real