2 Feb
2013
2 Feb
'13
1:21 a.m.
hi *!
today, i checked out guitarix for the first time, while working on a
clean guitar track that needed some cojonification. built straight from
git w/o issues (except for the fact that it does require a ladspa header
even if explicitly asked not build ladspa plugins).
after two hours of experimenting, i feel compelled to share my impression:
FUCK YEAH!
many thanks for sharing this awesome tool.
best,
jörn
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487
Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio)
Tonmeister VDT
http://stackingdwarves.net
2 Feb
2 Feb
8:23 p.m.
On 02/02/2013 01:21 AM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
hi *!
today, i checked out guitarix for the first time, while working on a
clean guitar track that needed some cojonification. built straight from
git w/o issues (except for the fact that it does require a ladspa header
even if explicitly asked not build ladspa plugins).
after two hours of experimenting, i feel compelled to share my impression:
FUCK YEAH!
many thanks for sharing this awesome tool.
best,
jörn
Good stuff ey?
I'm working on my workshop application for LAC2013, using your electric
guitar with Linux audio. Starring guitarix of course :)
Jeremy
4 Feb
4 Feb
8:37 a.m.
Am 02.02.2013 20:23, schrieb Jeremy Jongepier:
Good stuff ey?
I'm working on my workshop application for LAC2013, using your
electric guitar with Linux audio. Starring guitarix of course :)
Jeremy
On 02/02/2013 01:21 AM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> hi *!
>
>
> today, i checked out guitarix for the first time, while working on a
> clean guitar track that needed some cojonification. built straight from
> git w/o issues (except for the fact that it does require a ladspa header
> even if explicitly asked not build ladspa plugins).
>
That's because guitarix is a ladspa host as well, so the ladspa headers
are required even when you disable the build of the ladspa plugs.
> after two hours of experimenting, i feel compelled
to share my
> impression:
>
> FUCK YEAH!
>
> many thanks for sharing this awesome tool.
>
> best,
>
>
> jörn
>
I'm glad to hear you found it useful. :-)
greets
hermann
3:24 p.m.
Am 04.02.2013 08:37, schrieb hermann meyer:
Good stuff ey?
I'm working on my workshop application for LAC2013, using your
electric guitar with Linux audio. Starring guitarix of course :)
Jeremy
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Am 02.02.2013 20:23, schrieb Jeremy Jongepier:
Ah, well, I just checked that we have disable the check for the ladspa
header when --no-ladspa is used, indeed a bug, I have correct it now in
GIT,
thanks for the hint. ( Even if it takes me a while to understand what
you mean :-) , my foul)
greets
hermann
On 02/02/2013 01:21 AM, Jörn Nettingsmeier
wrote:
> hi *!
>
>
> today, i checked out guitarix for the first time, while working on a
> clean guitar track that needed some cojonification. built straight from
> git w/o issues (except for the fact that it does require a ladspa
> header
> even if explicitly asked not build ladspa plugins).
>
That's because guitarix is a ladspa host as well, so the ladspa
headers are required even when you disable the build of the ladspa plugs. > after two
hours of experimenting, i feel compelled to share my
> impression:
>
> FUCK YEAH!
>
> many thanks for sharing this awesome tool.
>
> best,
>
>
> jörn
>
I'm glad to hear you found it useful. :-)
greets
hermann
4312
days inactive
4314
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
hermann meyer -
Jeremy Jongepier -
Jörn Nettingsmeier