9 Jun
2010
9 Jun
'10
11:27 p.m.
i turn on a gmail labs feature to make "Reply to all" my default, and
it sucks eggs ...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [LAU] setting a samples loop points on command line
To: Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Paul!
I am curious. You say WAV has no standard chunks to describe loop points.
How come
many wave files actually do have loop points in them? Or is it a special
feature?
it is a documented and widely used chunk, but to the best of my
understanding it never became part of any standard. my understanding
could be wrong.
--p
10 Jun
10 Jun
12:11 a.m.
Paul Davis wrote:
i turn on a gmail labs feature to make "Reply to
all" my default, and
it sucks eggs ...
"Reply to all" is also a pita for some recipients. If you do "Reply to
all" to one of my emails on the list a number of things can happen:
a) I get two copies, one in Inbox and one in my LAU folder. If I try
to filter duplicates the one in my Inbox arrives first and is
kept while the one from the list manager will get dropped as a
duplicate. This is a PITA.
b) The list software can detect that I was CCed and not send me a
copy, but then I only get one copy in my Inbox and I have to
manually move it to the LAU folder. This is also a PITA.
This gets complicated further if the mail is CCed to the LAD and LAU
mailing lists.
Some mail clients have a "Reply to list" feature which is more likely to
do the right thing than "Reply to all".
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
4:23 a.m.
New subject: Fwd: setting a samples loop points on command line
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
<mle+la(a)mega-nerd.com> wrote:
Paul Davis wrote:
yeah, i know all that. gmail provides "reply" by default, "reply to
all" is normally accessible via a menu. there is a gmail labs feature
that flips that around so that whatever "reply to all" does is now
supposed to be the default. only ... sometimes ... its not :(
i turn on a gmail labs feature to make
"Reply to all" my default, and
it sucks eggs ...
"Reply to all" is also a pita for some recipients. If you do "Reply to
all" to one of my emails on the list a number of things can happen: 
10:11 a.m.
On 2010-06-10 00:11, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Some mail clients have a "Reply to list"
feature which is more likely to
do the right thing than "Reply to all".
I use the reply-list button for mailinglists, but for some reason, it's
not showing up on all mails. It seems it's based on which person wrote
the message (in fact it would be which mailer they're using and/or how
it's configured). It even seems to be be depending on whether they
started a thread or posted inside a thread or even who wrote the message
they're replying to.
Strange indeed. So far my approach has been to use reply-list when
possible, otherwise use reply-all...
NB: This mail was initiated by reply-list.
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
10:19 a.m.
Atte André Jensen wrote:
On 2010-06-10 00:11, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Its probably based on the List-Id mail headers.
Whats probably happening is some has replied and CCed you. Your mail
server or client accepts the direct email and drops the mail from
the list as a duplicate. However, the direct mail doesn't have the
List-Id mail headers so you can't Reply-List to it.
Some mail clients have a "Reply to
list" feature which is more likely to
do the right thing than "Reply to all".
I use the reply-list button for mailinglists, but for some reason, it's
not showing up on all mails. It seems it's based on which person wrote
the message (in fact it would be which mailer they're using and/or how
it's configured). NB: This mail was initiated by reply-list.
Good man!
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
5286
days inactive
5287
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Atte André Jensen -
Erik de Castro Lopo -
Paul Davis