23 Jan
2009
23 Jan
'09
10:15 p.m.
On 1/23/09, Justin Smith <noisesmith(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Audacity does not play very well with jack at the
moment, though they
are looking to change that soon. Ardour and qtractor are both going to
be a better bet for recording from two apps at once.
I was kind of hoping that the culprit was my audacity or jackd
blindness (perhaps some missing connection in qjackctl). But
apparently no such luck...
Thanks!
Andras
24 Jan
24 Jan
10:36 a.m.
New subject: Audio recording from Rosegarden+QSynth+Hydrogen
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:15:04 +0100
Andras Simon <szajmi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/23/09, Justin Smith <noisesmith(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Why don't you use rosegarden for recording if you already use it
anyway? Hydrogen does jack transport and I think rosegarden does so as
well. Or do I miss something?
Audacity only shows up as jack client once you hit record or play, so
it's pretty much unusable with jack for the time being..
Regards,
Philipp
Audacity does not play very well with jack at the
moment, though
they are looking to change that soon. Ardour and qtractor are both
going to be a better bet for recording from two apps at once.
I was kind of hoping that the culprit was my audacity or jackd
blindness (perhaps some missing connection in qjackctl). But
apparently no such luck...
Thanks!
Andras 
12:04 p.m.
New subject: Audio recording from Rosegarden+QSynth+Hydrogen
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:36:52 +0100
<hollunder(a)gmx.at> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:15:04 +0100
Andras Simon <szajmi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If I want to record a mixture of synths and/or live audio I use
timemachine. 100% jack client which means you can set up routes for,
say, jamin on some channels but not others. timemachine also has this
great 10 second 'pre' recording so you don't miss anything at the start.
Once I have everything recorded *that's* when I load it into audacity
for further edits/effects.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
On 1/23/09, Justin Smith
<noisesmith(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Why don't you use rosegarden for recording if you already use it
anyway? Hydrogen does jack transport and I think rosegarden does so as
well. Or do I miss something?
Audacity only shows up as jack client once you hit record or play, so
it's pretty much unusable with jack for the time being..
Regards,
Philipp Audacity does not play very well with jack at the
moment, though
they are looking to change that soon. Ardour and qtractor are both
going to be a better bet for recording from two apps at once.
I was kind of hoping that the culprit was my audacity or jackd
blindness (perhaps some missing connection in qjackctl). But
apparently no such luck...
Thanks!
Andras 
12:09 p.m.
New subject: Audio recording from Rosegarden+QSynth+Hydrogen
On Sat, January 24, 2009 10:04 am, Folderol wrote:
If I want to record a mixture of synths and/or live
audio I use
timemachine. 100% jack client which means you can set up routes for,
I considered recommending this, but stopped short because timemachine
saves in 64-bit WAVs (by default)... and this presents its own challenges
for a novice.
--
G a b r i e l M B e d d i n g f i e l d
12:28 p.m.
New subject: Audio recording from Rosegarden+QSynth+Hydrogen
On 1/24/09, hollunder(a)gmx.at <hollunder(a)gmx.at> wrote:
Why don't you use rosegarden for recording if you
already use it
anyway? Hydrogen does jack transport and I think rosegarden does so as
well. Or do I miss something?
It's more likely that I do... I'm not sure I understand what you mean
by "recording". If you mean "press that red button in RG and start
playing", then well, yes, I do that in RG, and everything's fine
(usually). But after all the tracks are done (recorded), I'd like to
record (maybe this is wrong terminology; let's say "save") the
resulting audio as, say, a wav file, that one can listen to without
RG, hydrogen and all the synths being around. It's this that I have
problem with if there are more than one synths that are producing the
sounds for the tracks.
Does jack transport help in this second step?
Andras
3:19 p.m.
New subject: Audio recording from Rosegarden+QSynth+Hydrogen
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:28:50 +0100
Andras Simon <szajmi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/24/09, hollunder(a)gmx.at <hollunder(a)gmx.at>
wrote:
I think you should just look for audio export in rosegarden. It should
be able to do it and rosegarden has rather good documentation available.
If you already recorded everything into rosegarden (the audio out of
hydrogen, the audio out of qsynth, ...) then you shouldn't need another
app to get that into a wav file.
Jack transport is for simultaneous playback/recording of different
apps. You press one button and all jack transport enabled apps start to
roll.
Philipp
Why don't you use rosegarden for recording if
you already use it
anyway? Hydrogen does jack transport and I think rosegarden does so
as well. Or do I miss something?
It's more likely that I do... I'm not sure I understand what you mean
by "recording". If you mean "press that red button in RG and start
playing", then well, yes, I do that in RG, and everything's fine
(usually). But after all the tracks are done (recorded), I'd like to
record (maybe this is wrong terminology; let's say "save") the
resulting audio as, say, a wav file, that one can listen to without
RG, hydrogen and all the synths being around. It's this that I have
problem with if there are more than one synths that are producing the
sounds for the tracks.
Does jack transport help in this second step?
Andras
5:59 p.m.
New subject: Audio recording from Rosegarden+QSynth+Hydrogen
On 1/24/09, hollunder(a)gmx.at <hollunder(a)gmx.at> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:28:50 +0100
Andras Simon <szajmi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm guessing that audio export is available if one has audio (as
opposed to midi) tracks in RG. Is that correct? Or is there an audio
export option somewhere deep in the menu-structure of RG?
On 1/24/09, hollunder(a)gmx.at
<hollunder(a)gmx.at> wrote:
I think you should just look for audio export in rosegarden. It should
be able to do it and rosegarden has rather good documentation available. Why don't you use rosegarden for recording if
you already use it
anyway? Hydrogen does jack transport and I think rosegarden does so
as well. Or do I miss something?
It's more likely that I do... I'm not sure I understand what you mean
by "recording". If you mean "press that red button in RG and start
playing", then well, yes, I do that in RG, and everything's fine
(usually). But after all the tracks are done (recorded), I'd like to
record (maybe this is wrong terminology; let's say "save") the
resulting audio as, say, a wav file, that one can listen to without
RG, hydrogen and all the synths being around. It's this that I have
problem with if there are more than one synths that are producing the
sounds for the tracks.
Does jack transport help in this second step?
Andras If you already recorded everything into rosegarden
(the audio out of
hydrogen, the audio out of qsynth, ...) then you shouldn't need another
app to get that into a wav file.
This is yet another sense of "record", I'm afraid. I didn't record
_into_ RG; I recorded _with_ RG (in the "push that red button and
play" sense). I don't think RG has any audio data at this point
(though I may be wrong), it just drives qsynth and hydrogen. (I did
connect qsynth's and hydrogen's outputs to RG's input, but that
doesn't seem to make any difference.)
Jack transport is for simultaneous playback/recording
of different
apps. You press one button and all jack transport enabled apps start to
roll.
Cute!
Thanks,
Andras
8:38 p.m.
New subject: Audio recording from Rosegarden+QSynth+Hydrogen
On Saturday 24 January 2009 16:59:31 Andras Simon wrote:
all the best,
drew
On 1/24/09, hollunder(a)gmx.at <hollunder(a)gmx.at>
wrote:
I think I read something today indicating that you could record RGs master
outs back into an audio track in RG and then get at that wav somehow.
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:28:50 +0100
Andras Simon <szajmi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm guessing that audio export is available if one has audio (as
opposed to midi) tracks in RG. Is that correct? Or is there an audio
export option somewhere deep in the menu-structure of RG?
On 1/24/09, hollunder(a)gmx.at
<hollunder(a)gmx.at> wrote:
I think you should just look for audio export in rosegarden. It should
be able to do it and rosegarden has rather good documentation available. Why don't you use rosegarden for recording if
you already use it
anyway? Hydrogen does jack transport and I think rosegarden does so
as well. Or do I miss something?
It's more likely that I do... I'm not sure I understand what you mean
by "recording". If you mean "press that red button in RG and start
playing", then well, yes, I do that in RG, and everything's fine
(usually). But after all the tracks are done (recorded), I'd like to
record (maybe this is wrong terminology; let's say "save") the
resulting audio as, say, a wav file, that one can listen to without
RG, hydrogen and all the synths being around. It's this that I have
problem with if there are more than one synths that are producing the
sounds for the tracks.
Does jack transport help in this second step?
Andras If you already recorded everything into
rosegarden (the audio out of
hydrogen, the audio out of qsynth, ...) then you shouldn't need another
app to get that into a wav file.
This is yet another sense of "record", I'm afraid. I didn't record
_into_ RG; I recorded _with_ RG (in the "push that red button and
play" sense). I don't think RG has any audio data at this point
(though I may be wrong), it just drives qsynth and hydrogen. (I did
connect qsynth's and hydrogen's outputs to RG's input, but that
doesn't seem to make any difference.) Jack transport is for simultaneous
playback/recording of different
apps. You press one button and all jack transport enabled apps start to
roll.
Cute!
Thanks,
Andras
5811
days inactive
5812
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Andras Simon -
drew Roberts -
Folderol -
Gabriel M. Beddingfield -
hollunder＠gmx.at