On Thu May 14, 2009 at 03:48:16PM +0200, Andre Osku Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 21:25 +0100, Dan S wrote:
Apple defined some special "itunes"
tags in addition to the
basic RSS ones, which suit their purposes.
http://www.apple.com/itunes/whatson/podcasts/specs.html#rss
It might make sense for you to use standard podcast RSS
Yes. But what is the "podcast" standard ? that from Apple ?
if that of RSS (or Atom), then "podcast" is just a buzz-word, right ?
(thats why i explicit didn't use that word directly)
these days i mainly find mix (sendspace/rapidshar ~80mb MP3 file) links in twitter. a few
months to a year ago it was forums, before that i mainly streamripped rinse/deja/wfmu and
used scene topsites
tho my feed parser tends to find most of the mp3 links in 'podcast' feeds:
theres not one standard, as you know, so regex and some operators was in order:
http://repo.or.cz/w/element.git?a=blob;f=ruby/W/feed.rb
the alternative is format-sniffing and custom parsers for every format ever (but no
accomodation for bad/mixed implementations) aka the mark pilgrim/google/typical-feedparser
approach. they tended to be huge and broken for my needs
Yes, i did some small tests on how "your-package-manager search podcast"
tools display standard RSS 2.0 content as "podcast"... yeah, i can see
some "agreements" on what is displayed/interpreted, but miro for example
has an image "container" for every Item, but RSS 2.0 spec doesn't have
anything hinting to be an image Element in Item... (and Atom 1.0
BBC uses a media:thumbnail element in their feeds: (media ::
http://search.yahoo.com/mrss
)
http://newsrss.bbc.co.uk/rss/newsonline_world_edition/front_page/rss.xml
theres also ATom Media extensions and so forth:
http://intertwingly.net/blog/2009/01/08/Atom-Media-Extensions-for-Activity-…
neither) so do they use that Apple spec ?
But yes, i could use RSS 2.0 (but i would use Atom 1.0), if i only want
users to know the title and filename of an Item (consistently in
"podcast" players)...
Hey! why not use just a plain <a href=""></a> list ;P
amen!
I'll test that Apple "podcast" spec on FLOSS tools some other day...
but is this really all (interest) there is ?