hi
(just realized that i replyed directly to Will and not to the list;
apologies for a dang old email use case mistake:))
On 9/19/19 3:21 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On 9/19/19 2:01 PM, Will Godfrey wrote:
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:50:31 +0200
Christopher Arndt <chris(a)chrisarndt.de> wrote:
Am 19.09.19 um 13:54 schrieb Paul Davis:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:36 AM Christopher Arndt
<chris(a)chrisarndt.de
<mailto:chris@chrisarndt.de>> wrote:
I find that I don't really need a2midid anymore.
You need it to get accurately timed MIDI from MIDI hardware if you use
JACK2.
Interesting. Can you give a pointer to background information on that?
Chris
That's something I also found curious. Also, how accurate is 'accurate'.
I'm
using jack2 for audio (at 64 frames/48k), but ALSA for midi - all through, which
I would have through would result in less buffering.
let's put it this way:
jack2 implementation to "seq" (jack-midi) driver is an old decade+ and
quite frankly outdated and flawed re. to timing and what not
jack1 implementation, standing for the (-X) "alsamidi" for that matter,
is independent if not the same as to running a2jmidid in the background,
and as infrastructure (like IaaS, eh?:) also, on jack1, that goes
straight and _independent_ of whether you run (-d) "alsa" driver at all;
of course, only granted to work on linux, but otoh jack2 makes it
locked-in to the "alsa" audio diver anyhow, so you get the picture.
nb. on jack1, selecting (-X) "seq", as the preferred jack-midi driver
_is_exactly_the_same_as_ running "a2jmidid -e &", so that wouldn't be
a
viable option no longer ;)
and yes, to let my stanfd be clear enough, jack2 _shall_ make the
"alsamidi" (internal client?) driver ported in from jack1 alright.
for all the people that use jack2, please do and rely on good old
a2jmidid--it just works at lot and way better than any other option (but
jack1's;)
cheers
--
rncbc aka. Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc(a)rncbc.org