Excerpts from Kevin Cosgrove's message of 2010-06-02 01:59:30 +0200:
On 2 June 2010 at 0:10, Philipp <hollunder(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
It would be nice if I could at least improve the
recording, but
I don't quite know how to start. My only 'source' file is a
single mp3.
Bummer. But, ya can still learn.
The major problems of the recording are: 1)
quite a lot too
much bass of the acoustic guitar - this is easy to correct
2) a very loud noise, possibly from some part of a laptop. To
my knowledge the recording was made in two takes, guitar and
voice, on a laptop with a cheap mic of some sort. The noise
seems to be located mainly somewhere around 12kHz, a region
which seems to be important for the clarity of the voice. Any
attempts to just pull down with an eq (4-band parametric for
example is what I tried today) had a significant impact on the
voice.
3) a constant level of noise, probably from some part of the
cheap equipment used. Due to the two takes it's 'doubled' for
the most part of the song.
Is there any part of the sound file that has only the noise
present, without the music playing? The more the better; 5-10
seconds would be good, and 1-2 seconds might be adequate. If
so, then you could try the noise removal effect in Audacity.
I use it often and I'm quite happy with it. I would try the
noise removal first, before compounding the recording with other
effects.
Thanks for your reply Kevin. Audacity and its noise removal facilities
was the first thing I tried, about 7 years ago, back then on windows. I
may have tried it another time in between. Maybe it's time to give it
another shot.
Audacity at version 1.3.11 (probably before then, but
certainly
after 1.3.0) has a good graphic equalizer in it.
Parametric EQ might help to really "zoom in" on some things.
To tip it all off, I can't even make out all
lyrics. It might
be that some significant hints are simply masked by the noise,
or they simply are hard to make out.
After the noise reduction, then you might try compression or
expansion to isolate various sounds. Frequency sensitive
compression or expansion might also help, but is more difficult
to use.
I've seen some calf sideband compressor, maybe it will help with that,
thanks for the idea.
I'd really
love to somehow get this recording to an enjoyable
state, no matter how involving it is. Given the source it seems
next to impossible, but it has to be possible to make at least
some improvements.
One thing you might try, which I haven't tried, is to make
several passes at the file. On each pass you try to isolate one
instrument or vocal, making that sound as good as you can, while
trying to eliminate all the other sounds. Saving a collection
of those kinds of sound files might allow you to mix those
intermediate files back together to produce something useful.
This is certainly a thing worth trying, thanks. I'm not sure thought
that I can isolate it well enough to make this work.
Is this recording stereo, with things panned somewhat
left and
other things panned somewhat right, and yet other things panned
to center? If so, then you might be able to get at yet more
aspects of the recording by subtracting right from left, or visa
versa.
From what I gathered today the mp3 is stereo, but it
was recorded in two
passes with a single mic afaik, and I'm reasonably sure that
there's no
panning whatsoever. I'll check, but I think there's nothing to be
gained in this way.
Hmm, you might also websearch for "audio
forensics" or "audio
restoration" or similar topics as I'm sure there are folks who've
been farther down this path.
Thanks for the search hints.
Please report back on how it goes. I'll look for
your report in 7
years. ;-)
Good luck!
I hope it won't take another 7 years, but who knows...
--
Regards,
Philipp
--
"Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu und alle Fragen
offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan