26 Jul
2015
26 Jul
'15
12:17 p.m.
Jeremy, we shouldn't discuss this in the original thread.
There are latency test measurements in the mailing list archive. PCI and
PCIe cards show better results, IOW less MIDI jitter. There are also
explanations why USB suffers from more jitter.
The point of difference is, if the MIDI jitter is audible. It is! The
measurements might not provide correct results. To measure a system by
itself is a bad test and to measure a MIDI loop in addition is tricky.
Jakob (living in Augsburg) from a Linux mailing list (perhaps LAU or
LAD) years ago send me a board to loop through MIDI and that provides an
audio output, to record the MIDI signal to an audio track. I never had
time and interest to continued my MIDI jitter tests, so I still didn't
use it. I guess this would be a better test, then the latency test.
Howsoever, it's better to use PCI or PCIe, IIRC some USB interfaces
even fail(ed) the latency test that measures a MIDI loop. The USB
interface I own doesn't fail the test, but I'm anyway not satisfied and
use PCI and PCIe MIDI only.
That's it, I can't provide more information and I'm not willing to
search the mailing lists archives.
Regards,
Ralf
26 Jul
26 Jul
11 p.m.
New subject: MIDI jitter - Was: outfitting a computer for songwriting in linux?
On 07/26/2015 12:17 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I don't think it is. There are virtually no manufacturers that produce
great numbers of PCI(e) interfaces with MIDI and besides, the number of
new computers with PCI(e) is not that great too. That leaves basically
one choice, USB MIDI.
I'll give this a try, good suggestion, thanks.
If you make syncopated or measure free music
Jeremy, we shouldn't discuss this in the original
thread.
Hello Ralf,
Agreed.
There are latency test measurements in the mailing
list archive. PCI and
PCIe cards show better results, IOW less MIDI jitter. There are also
explanations why USB suffers from more jitter.
The point of difference is, if the MIDI jitter is audible. It is! The
measurements might not provide correct results. To measure a system by
itself is a bad test and to measure a MIDI loop in addition is tricky.
Jakob (living in Augsburg) from a Linux mailing list (perhaps LAU or
LAD) years ago send me a board to loop through MIDI and that provides an
audio output, to record the MIDI signal to an audio track. I never had
time and interest to continued my MIDI jitter tests, so I still didn't
use it. I guess this would be a better test, then the latency test.
Howsoever, it's better to use PCI or PCIe, IIRC some USB interfaces
even fail(ed) the latency test that measures a MIDI loop. The USB
interface I own doesn't fail the test, but I'm anyway not satisfied and
use PCI and PCIe MIDI only.
That's it, I can't provide more information and I'm not willing to
search the mailing lists archives.
Thanks, I'll dig through the archives to see if I can find related messages.
On 07/26/2015 11:42 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015
11:01:46 +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
In the
meanwhile the whole planet is using USB for MIDI.
That's an assertion without substance. Please explain what is wrong with it, if possible
with test results or
something else that confirms your assumption. I've never experienced
any jitter issues, not even with external MIDI gear.
Search the LAU and LAD mailing list archives or edit a
four-on-the-floor kick MIDI track. Play an external synth and make an
audio recording of that kick, record the kick again and you'll notice
that the kicks are never in sync, you'll hear an early reflection like
shift or a moving phasing. this is a serious issue, but it already is an issue if
you want to
sync four-on-the-floor kicks or similar. A lot of people claim that
MIDI is not good enough to record "hand made" music, it always suffers
from quantisation. To record really "hand made" music there's the need
to do audio recordings. That's not completely wrong, but MIDI isn't that
bad as many people nowadays think that it is. If you use a C64 or Atari
ST and sync by klick or by SMPTE to a tape recorder, you get perfect
sync.
I noticed that shift of MIDI events is related to the used audio
latency. The longer the latency is, the less precise is the timing of
the recorded MIDI events on audio tracks. I never was able to get less
audio latency than 5.3 ms (-r48000 -p256 -n2).
So that could be one of the sources of your issues. I mainly use -r48000
-p64 -n3 and honestly, I've never experienced any jitter issues. This
article seems to confirm that:
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Oct04/articles/qa1004-7.htm (one of the
first articles I could find on this issue)
Only the Larry Mullen Jr's of this world would notice jitter in that
case (http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/04/25/the-possibilian). And
I'm no Larry Mullen Jr ;)
Jeremy
FWIW there's zero audible (and perhaps zero
measurable) jitter when
using internal virtual synth. We don't know what exactly the OP want's
to do, but she seemingly does use external gear.
Regards,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
11:31 p.m.
New subject: MIDI jitter - Was: outfitting a computer for songwriting in linux?
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 23:00:24 +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
"Brown Shoes Don't Make It" :D
Actually a timing error is like the flower ;).
27 Jul
27 Jul
9:56 a.m.
New subject: MIDI jitter - Was: outfitting a computer for songwriting in linux?
"Academic studies have indicated that jitter becomes noticeable between
1 and 5ms, with a weighting around 2-3ms (Van Noorden 1975, Michon
1964, and Lunney 1974). Note that these tests only measured the
perception of jitter while listening, not while performing. Intuitively
I expect performing musicians to be even less tolerant to it."
"As sample buffer sizes are reduced, the jitter reduces"
http://expressiveness.org/2012/12/04/midi-jitter
When we measured the MIDI loops a few years ago people didn't believe
that I'm able to notice the jitter and they posted links about "good"
drummers who are more out of time than MIDI jitter is. Even while it's
true that a good musician is out of time too, it's done with human
touch, the human "jitter" provides the good groove. Machine's jitter
breaks the groove, it's arbitrary jitter, The musicians jitter is
aligned to the emotion the music should communicate.
However, the link above also claims that _it is noticeable_ and we
should keep in mind that a MIDI loop measurement doesn't care about
MIDI jitter of the receiving synth and jitter caused when the audio
signal is synced to the MIDI events. When recording very short click
sounds with a short attack, it's still hard to find the position were
the audio signal starts, when taking a look at the audio files, so
measurements a hard to do.
Another nice test is to record the MIDI events parallel to the audio
signal. With a high resolution for the MIDI events (quasi no
quantisation) playing the audio and MIDI track parallel should be
identical, but it isn't.
Taking a look at audio recordings of MIDI tracks, I noticed that jitter
peaks are periodically. Even while the graphics doesn't share the IRQ
with the audio gear, the periodic jitter peaks differ when using
different graphics.
Btw. I tried to find some of the tests we made a few years ago, but
searching the archives is not easy to do. At the moment I don't have
time to search my mails for that tests.
10:22 a.m.
New subject: MIDI jitter - Was: outfitting a computer for songwriting in linux?
PS: We also care about the tone of the notes, not only about the timing
of the notes. Tone of a note is not only related to the kind of touch,
but also of the timing, regarding phases to the other instruments that
are played. I suspect that human jitter is less randomly as machine's
jitter. Neuroscience can't explain a lot of human abilities.
https://www.google.de/search?q=savant+painter&biw=1152&bih=709&…
;)
http://www.stephenwiltshire.co.uk/Tokyo_Panorama_by_Stephen_Wiltshire.aspx
This and a few other "particularities" aren't seldom for all kinds of
artists.
12:37 p.m.
New subject: MIDI jitter - Was: outfitting a computer for songwriting in linux?
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
"Academic studies have indicated that jitter
becomes noticeable between
1 and 5ms, with a weighting around 2-3ms
Which indicates that few people would have a problem with USB MIDI.
I tried to find some of the tests we made a few years
ago
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2010-July/thread.html
Regards,
Clemens
1:39 p.m.
New subject: MIDI jitter - Was: outfitting a computer for songwriting in linux?
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:37:01 +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
http://lists.linuxaudio.org ... /2010-July/
^^^^^^^^^^^
I didn't read that tests again, but I guess we later made tests with
better results. Were the 2010 tests already made with jackd2
-Xalsarawmidi?
IIRC there were (later) tests made with jackd2 from svn and the
-Xalsarawmidi switch while HR TIMER - ALSA MIDI playback queue timer
res 1000000000 Hz was enabled. 2011 or later. My PCI cards and/or my
PCIe card had 0.0x ms jitter for the MIDI out to MIDI in loop
measurement. ^^^ Or perhaps even for the recorded MIDI instruments on
the audio tracks.
I don't remember if recordings to audio tracks were really that
synchrone too. IIRC there are several issues to consider. I guess the
0.0x ms were ok that time when recording to audio tracks, but IIRC there
always was around 1 ms for USB and it was audible.
Without jackd2 -Xalsarawmidi jitter increased rapidly.
jackd2's -Xalsarawmidi was new or fixed, I don't remember the year.
You always need to keep in mind that multi-track recordings could be
done one track after the other and the jitter of the MIDI events
recorded to the audio tracks has got positive and negative delay, so
1ms could become 2ms and 5ms could become 10ms.
An early reflection might be >= 5ms, but a similar effect already is
noticeable if the delay is shorter. If you record a synth or hihat
sample 2 times from a MIDI track to audio tracks to get a fixed phase
sound and there's just minimal jitter, everybody will hear the phasing
moving.
Better than measurements is simply making music. If there are no
audible issues, when recording MIDI to audio, then there are no issues.
If there are audible issues, then there are issues, what ever a
measurment would show.
In my experiences there are less often issues when using PCI/PCIe MIDI.
If it's wanted to use two external percussive sounds to become one
sound, then I wouldn't record them one after the other, as I did with
old sequencers, nowadays I try to record them at the same time or to
make a sound sample or ... I at least never ever would consider to use
USB MIDI.
Regards,
Ralf
PS: I won't to discuss this, resp. I have no time to continue this
discussion. Resume: If a musician doesn't notice an issue it's ok, if a
musician notice an issue, than it doesn't matter if most other people
are unable to notice it too. It's more likely that somebody is able to
notice jitter when using USB, than when using PCI/PCIe.
3408
days inactive
3409
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Clemens Ladisch -
Jeremy Jongepier -
Ralf Mardorf