15 Dec
2009
15 Dec
'09
6:07 a.m.
http://www.kresearch.com/Free-Series.htm
Now includes a linux VST for their KR-Reverb plugin.
Promises of more to come. This is progress :-)
15 Dec
15 Dec
6:20 a.m.
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 12:07 +0200, David Baron wrote:
http://www.kresearch.com/Free-Series.htm
Now includes a linux VST for their KR-Reverb plugin.
Promises of more to come. This is progress :-)
Closed-source plugins for a non-free plugin interface is progress?
I'll stick with my 'retrograde' LADSPA and LV2 plugins, thanks.
6:59 a.m.
Peter Nelson wrote:
Closed-source plugins for a non-free plugin interface
is progress?
Or course it is. It's all about options (you're free to *not* use them,
or course). I try to avoid VSTs if possible, but others are depending on
them.
I'll stick with my 'retrograde' LADSPA and
LV2 plugins, thanks.
That's fine...
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
7:39 a.m.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Atte André Jensen
<atte.jensen(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
We need market, the more we have the better, and GUI's I want to have nicer
interfaces too!
> > I'll stick with my 'retrograde' LADSPA and LV2 plugins, thanks.
That would make the LV2 work on GUI's too
> That's fine...
> --
> Atte
> http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Peter Nelson wrote:
them.
Closed-source plugins for a non-free plugin
interface is progress?
Or course it is. It's all about options (you're free to *not* use them,
or course). I try to avoid VSTs if possible, but others are depending on 
8:16 a.m.
From a message I posted in one of the Ardour forums:
"Let's see what I have in ~/vst-linux:
Eqinox (EQ)
Soundcrab (SF2 synth)
HybridReverb2
KR-ReverbFS
Aspect (synth) and others from Loomer
Discovery (synth)
HyperCyclic (MIDI processor)
Manifold (audio signal processor)
dfx Transverb
Highlife (sampler)
ZR3VST (organ synth)
12 plugins from Michael Gruhn
38 plugins from mda
33 plugins from pizmidi
16 plugins from s-productions
There are more, especially from JOST creator Lucio Asnaghi... To be
honest and fair, not all these plugins work or work well (though most
do), and not all are particularly worthwhile (think LADSPA). However,
the pizmidi plugins are wonderful, Eqinox is great, Soundcrab is a
powerful alternative to QSynth, and so forth."
The post was a response to a statement that there are very few native VSTs.
Best,
dp
9:31 a.m.
There are more, especially from JOST creator Lucio
Asnaghi... To be
honest and fair, not all these plugins work or work well (though most
do), and not all are particularly worthwhile (think LADSPA). However,
the pizmidi plugins are wonderful, Eqinox is great, Soundcrab is a
powerful alternative to QSynth, and so forth."
I still haven't got round on which is the best way to run linux-nativ
VSTs. For dlls it's maily FST. JOST seems very unstable, but maybe I'm
missing something.
Lorenzo
10:17 a.m.
Lorenzo wrote:
I still haven't got round on which is the best way
to run linux-nativ
VSTs. For dlls it's maily FST. JOST seems very unstable, but maybe I'm
missing something.
Well, first of all you need a host that supports it. Just looked very
quickly at the websites of muse and rosegarden, and neither seems to
support vsts.
NB: I'm using renoise...
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
10:40 a.m.
Atte André Jensen wrote:
Lorenzo wrote:
From http://qtractor.sourceforge.net/qtractor-index.html#Features :
LADSPA <http://www.ladspa.org/>, DSSI <http://dssi.sourceforge.net/> and
native VST <http://www.steinberg.net/>i plug-in support.
Best,
dp
I still haven't got round on which is the
best way to run linux-nativ
VSTs. For dlls it's maily FST. JOST seems very unstable, but maybe
I'm missing something.
Well, first of all you need a host that supports it. Just looked very
quickly at the websites of muse and rosegarden, and neither seems to
support vsts.
NB: I'm using renoise...
12:41 p.m.
Hi,
i'm feeling pretty good about this one! (see attached)
The best part is controlling the knobs and sliders of the EQ in energy XT
with my el cheapo USB DJ Mixer (X-Session Pro)
Thank you
Ron
Indamixx
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Dave Phillips <dlphillips(a)woh.rr.com>wrote;wrote:
Atte André Jensen wrote:
Lorenzo wrote:
From http://qtractor.sourceforge.net/qtractor-index.html#Features :
LADSPA <http://www.ladspa.org/>, DSSI <http://dssi.sourceforge.net/> and
native VST <http://www.steinberg.net/>i plug-in support.
Best,
dp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
I still haven't got round on which is the
best way to run linux-nativ
VSTs. For dlls it's maily FST. JOST seems very unstable, but maybe
I'm missing something.
Well, first of all you need a host that supports it. Just looked very
quickly at the websites of muse and rosegarden, and neither seems to
support vsts.
NB: I'm using renoise...
3:59 p.m.
I still haven't got round on which is the best way
to run linux-nativ
From http://qtractor.sourceforge.net/qtractor-index.html#Features :
LADSPA <http://www.ladspa.org/>, DSSI <http://dssi.sourceforge.net/> and
native VST <http://www.steinberg.net/>i plug-in support.
VSTs. For dlls it's maily FST. JOST seems
very unstable, but maybe
I'm missing something.
Well, first of all you need a host that supports it. Just looked very
quickly at the websites of muse and rosegarden, and neither seems to
support vsts.
NB: I'm using renoise...
17 Dec
17 Dec
3:50 a.m.
>>> I still haven't got round on which is
the best way to run linux-nativ
>>>
>>>> VSTs. For dlls it's maily FST. JOST seems very unstable, but maybe
>>>> I'm missing something.
>>>>
>>> Well, first of all you need a host that supports it. Just looked very
>>> quickly at the websites of muse and rosegarden, and neither seems to
>>> support vsts.
>>>
>>> NB: I'm using renoise...
>>>
>> From http://qtractor.sourceforge.net/qtractor-index.html#Features :
>>
>> LADSPA <http://www.ladspa.org/>, DSSI <http://dssi.sourceforge.net/>
and
>> native VST <http://www.steinberg.net/>i plug-in support.
>>
Sorry but I'm still not sure if I understand correctly.
To be a little clear, what I mean is 'what to do with the .so'? And can
they work *without* steinberg vst etc. In this case which applications
support .so?
Otherwise what is the real advantage of using 'native' vst (.so) vs
windows vst (.dll), given that FST - for instance - will work with any
jack-enabled applications.
Bests,
Lorenzo.
4:30 a.m.
Lorenzo wrote:
Sorry but I'm still not sure if I understand
correctly.
That's ok, it's a bit fuzzy annyhow :-)
To be a little clear, what I mean is 'what to do
with the .so'?
Depends on the host. Renoise looks in standard locations + ~/.vst +
what's in the environmen variable $VST_PATH.
And can
they work *without* steinberg vst etc.
I'm not sure what you mean. Mosts hosts have other means than vst to
both generate sound and add fx. So they could operate "by themselves"
without any vst. If you mean "do I need to install something from
steinberg", then no. Just your host and place the vsts (.so) in the
prober location, and you're set.
If you want to *compile* vst plugins from source, you need a copy of the
steinberg SDK, which can be downloaded from their web page. I think
there is some opensource replacement for this SDK, but I'm not sure.
In this case which applications
support .so?
ardour (open source), qtractor (open source), renoise (closed source)
and energyXT (closed source) are the ones I know, there might be others,
though.
Otherwise what is the real advantage of using
'native' vst (.so) vs
windows vst (.dll), given that FST - for instance - will work with any
jack-enabled applications.
I never used fst, but I think windows vsts loaded here will not
integrate with with your host as nicely. I guess they should be loaded
in another application (fst?) which will appear as a second jack client
and then you can send audio to that using jack. But I'm only guessing here.
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
6:08 a.m.
New subject: [OT]: Online petition: Speak Out Against Copyright Extension!
Although off-topic I think it is of interest to many FLOSS, CC people:
http://www.soundcopyright.eu/petition
Kind regards,
Lorenzo.
1:39 p.m.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Atte André Jensen
<atte.jensen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
hi everyone,
other than the hosts listed here by Atte, are there any other hosts
that we know of? it would be nice if we had a simple stand-alone host
that supported jack midi. (something akin to what the windows folks
have in vst-host...all the app does is host linux vst applications.)
this would be very, very useful to me.
--
Josh Lawrence
http://www.hardbop200.com
In this case
which applications
support .so?
ardour (open source), qtractor (open source), renoise (closed source)
and energyXT (closed source) are the ones I know, there might be others,
though.
18 Dec
18 Dec
3:08 a.m.
Josh Lawrence wrote:
other than the hosts listed here by Atte, are there
any other hosts
that we know of? it would be nice if we had a simple stand-alone host
that supported jack midi. (something akin to what the windows folks
have in vst-host...all the app does is host linux vst applications.)
this would be very, very useful to me.
Ahh, I forgot jost (open source), which does exactly what you need, host
vsts, no sequencer or DAW in there...
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
20 Dec
20 Dec
7:07 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Atte André Jensen schrieb:
Josh Lawrence wrote:
Well, there *is* a sequencer in jost actually. It is a pretty usable one
that resembles Seq24 a bit with a classical piano-roll-editor.
other than the hosts listed here by Atte, are
there any other hosts
that we know of? it would be nice if we had a simple stand-alone host
that supported jack midi. (something akin to what the windows folks
have in vst-host...all the app does is host linux vst applications.)
this would be very, very useful to me.
Ahh, I forgot jost (open source), which does exactly what you need, host
vsts, no sequencer or DAW in there... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAksuBWMACgkQ1Aecwva1SWOkBACfR1XRTzn5HrEU4TD7nQw2XiTu
joUAnA2e/qqReYkMK4kKDti/BpMLTuC+
=ADMX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
15 Dec
15 Dec
8:09 a.m.
Atte André Jensen wrote:
Would it be possible to build an LV2 to VST adapter, so that I could use
native VSTs in Ardour, etc. in the same way that DSSI-VST lets
Rosegarden use Windows VST synths? Does something like this already exist?
Thanks
Leigh
Peter Nelson wrote:
Agreed -- closed-source VSTs may not be ideal, but they're another
option, and the more options Linux has, the broader an audience it can
appeal to.
Closed-source plugins for a non-free plugin
interface is progress?
Or course it is. It's all about options (you're free to *not* use them,
or course). I try to avoid VSTs if possible, but others are depending on
them. I'll stick with my 'retrograde'
LADSPA and LV2 plugins, thanks.
That's fine...
5496
days inactive
5501
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
16 comments
11 participants
participants (11)
-
Atte André Jensen -
Dave Phillips -
David Baron -
Hartmut Noack -
Josh Lawrence -
Leigh Dyer -
Lorenzo -
Matt Henley -
Pablo Gómez Poch -
Peter Nelson -
Ronald Stewart