5 Apr
2008
5 Apr
'08
1:27 p.m.
Hello list,
Since I have installed Gentoo I got some issue with JACK. I am using Jackdmp
When I run qjackctl all is right but the CPU percent, in spite of staying
around 3 or 4% it is moving : 4% then 3 %, then it passes to 27% then 10%
and 53% and 4% ...
I don't understand very well what it is going wrong.
My config : gentoo 64 bits version on a Dell Insprion 9400 Intel Core Duo 2
T7200 with 2 Go Ram.
Firstly I had installed jack 0.109 and the issue was worse that jackdmp
:sometimes CPU load until 80%
The kernel I use was compiled by my own. Perhpas I forgot an option or
something...
uname -a :
2.6.24-rt1 #4 SMP PREEMPT RT Sun Mar 16 21:42:41:CET 2008 x86_64
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Thank you very much for your help.
Cheers,
Mysth-R
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* http://myspace.com/mysthr
* http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié à l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
5 Apr
5 Apr
4:59 p.m.
Sounds similar to the issue I spoke of here a week ago.
If its the latest Qjackctl built with QT4, its a QT4 problem of yet
to be defined origin. Only difference I had, going by your
description, was that
My CPU was running at 99% and staying there.
If you run jack from the command line and see normal Cpu, this
would point to the same problem.
I have not yeilded a root cause from my Googling. Only some
similar instances from other users, not only with Qjackctl & Qsynth,
but also Skype and others built with QT4.
My fix for now was to revert to an older version of qjackctl.
Thanks!
On Apr 5, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Mysth-R <mysthr21(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello list,
Since I have installed Gentoo I got some issue with JACK. I am using
Jackdmp
When I run qjackctl all is right but the CPU percent, in spite of
staying around 3 or 4% it is moving : 4% then 3 %, then it passes to
27% then 10% and 53% and 4% ...
I don't understand very well what it is going wrong.
My config : gentoo 64 bits version on a Dell Insprion 9400 Intel
Core Duo 2 T7200 with 2 Go Ram.
Firstly I had installed jack 0.109 and the issue was worse that
jackdmp :sometimes CPU load until 80%
The kernel I use was compiled by my own. Perhpas I forgot an option
or something...
uname -a :
2.6.24-rt1 #4 SMP PREEMPT RT Sun Mar 16 21:42:41:CET 2008 x86_64
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Thank you very much for your help.
Cheers,
Mysth-R
--
*
***
***
***
***
***
***
*********************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* http://myspace.com/mysthr
* http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié à l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***
***
***
***
***
***
*********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
6 Apr
6 Apr
9:12 a.m.
Hi, and thank you for your answer.
I am actually trying qjackctl 0.2.23 and the problem is the same. So it
should not be a QT problem.
Anyway, I can note that for the same qjackctl config the cpu load percent is
lower on version 0.2.23 (~= 2.5 - 3%) than on the 0.3.2 version (3 - 4.5%).
If someone has anonther Idea ... :)
Cheers,
Mysth-R
2008/4/5, Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan(a)starband.net>et>:
Sounds similar to the issue I spoke of here a week ago.
If its the latest Qjackctl built with QT4, its a QT4 problem of yet
to be defined origin. Only difference I had, going by your description,
was that
My CPU was running at 99% and staying there.
If you run jack from the command line and see normal Cpu, this
would point to the same problem.
I have not yeilded a root cause from my Googling. Only some
similar instances from other users, not only with Qjackctl & Qsynth,
but also Skype and others built with QT4.
My fix for now was to revert to an older version of qjackctl.
Thanks!
On Apr 5, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Mysth-R <mysthr21(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello list,
Since I have installed Gentoo I got some issue with JACK. I am using
Jackdmp
When I run qjackctl all is right but the CPU percent, in spite of staying
around 3 or 4% it is moving : 4% then 3 %, then it passes to 27% then 10%
and 53% and 4% ...
I don't understand very well what it is going wrong.
My config : gentoo 64 bits version on a Dell Insprion 9400 Intel Core Duo
2 T7200 with 2 Go Ram.
Firstly I had installed jack 0.109 and the issue was worse that jackdmp
:sometimes CPU load until 80%
The kernel I use was compiled by my own. Perhpas I forgot an option or
something...
uname -a :
2.6.24-rt1 #4 SMP PREEMPT RT Sun Mar 16 21:42:41:CET 2008 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU
T7200 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Thank you very much for your help.
Cheers,
Mysth-R
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* <http://myspace.com/mysthr>http://myspace.com/mysthr
* <http://myspace.com/aideauditive>http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* <http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla>http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site
dédié à l'audio sous Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* http://myspace.com/mysthr
* http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié à l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
9:24 a.m.
I forgot to precise that my sound card is a Presonus Firebox and run with
Freebob.
I got the idea to test with my U-control Uca202 (Behringer) Usb sound-card,
and there is no problems. The cpu percent is quite stable around 2,1%.
It is a bit strange because I got the rtirq script congiured for my firewire
card. So it should not work better than my firewire ...
I am a bit lost !! :O[
2008/4/6, Mysth-R <mysthr21(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi, and thank you for your answer.
I am actually trying qjackctl 0.2.23 and the problem is the same. So it
should not be a QT problem.
Anyway, I can note that for the same qjackctl config the cpu load percent
is lower on version 0.2.23 (~= 2.5 - 3%) than on the 0.3.2 version (3 -
4.5%).
If someone has anonther Idea ... :)
Cheers,
Mysth-R
2008/4/5, Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan(a)starband.net>et>:
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* http://myspace.com/mysthr
* http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié à l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
Sounds similar to the issue I spoke of here a week ago.
If its the latest Qjackctl built with QT4, its a QT4 problem of yet
to be defined origin. Only difference I had, going by your description,
was that
My CPU was running at 99% and staying there.
If you run jack from the command line and see normal Cpu, this
would point to the same problem.
I have not yeilded a root cause from my Googling. Only some
similar instances from other users, not only with Qjackctl & Qsynth,
but also Skype and others built with QT4.
My fix for now was to revert to an older version of qjackctl.
Thanks!
On Apr 5, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Mysth-R <mysthr21(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello list,
Since I have installed Gentoo I got some issue with JACK. I am using
Jackdmp
When I run qjackctl all is right but the CPU percent, in spite of
staying around 3 or 4% it is moving : 4% then 3 %, then it passes to 27%
then 10% and 53% and 4% ...
I don't understand very well what it is going wrong.
My config : gentoo 64 bits version on a Dell Insprion 9400 Intel Core
Duo 2 T7200 with 2 Go Ram.
Firstly I had installed jack 0.109 and the issue was worse that jackdmp
:sometimes CPU load until 80%
The kernel I use was compiled by my own. Perhpas I forgot an option or
something...
uname -a :
2.6.24-rt1 #4 SMP PREEMPT RT Sun Mar 16 21:42:41:CET 2008 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU
T7200 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Thank you very much for your help.
Cheers,
Mysth-R
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* <http://myspace.com/mysthr>http://myspace.com/mysthr
* <http://myspace.com/aideauditive>http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* <http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla>http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site
dédié à l'audio sous Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* http://myspace.com/mysthr
* http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié à l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
7 Apr
7 Apr
3 a.m.
Mysth-R wrote:
I forgot to precise that my sound card is a Presonus
Firebox and run
with Freebob.
I got the idea to test with my U-control Uca202 (Behringer) Usb
sound-card, and there is no problems. The cpu percent is quite stable
around 2,1%.
It is a bit strange because I got the rtirq script congiured for my
firewire card. So it should not work better than my firewire ...
I am a bit lost !! :O[
Is the 'real' cpu time (e.g. from top) also that high? It could be that
there is a bug in the time reporting of the freebob backend, resulting
in a bad calculation of the cpu time.
Greets,
Pieter
2008/4/6, Mysth-R <mysthr21(a)gmail.com <mailto:mysthr21@gmail.com>>:
Hi, and thank you for your answer.
I am actually trying qjackctl 0.2.23 and the problem is the same. So
it should not be a QT problem.
Anyway, I can note that for the same qjackctl config the cpu load
percent is lower on version 0.2.23 (~= 2.5 - 3%) than on the 0.3.2
version (3 - 4.5%).
If someone has anonther Idea ... :)
Cheers,
Mysth-R
2008/4/5, Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan(a)starband.net
<mailto:hanaghan@starband.net>>:
Sounds similar to the issue I spoke of here a week ago.
If its the latest Qjackctl built with QT4, its a QT4 problem of yet
to be defined origin. Only difference I had, going by your
description, was that
My CPU was running at 99% and staying there.
If you run jack from the command line and see normal Cpu, this
would point to the same problem.
I have not yeilded a root cause from my Googling. Only some
similar instances from other users, not only with Qjackctl & Qsynth,
but also Skype and others built with QT4.
My fix for now was to revert to an older version of qjackctl.
Thanks!
On Apr 5, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Mysth-R <mysthr21(a)gmail.com
<mailto:mysthr21@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello list,
Since I have installed Gentoo I got some issue with JACK. I am
using Jackdmp
When I run qjackctl all is right but the CPU percent, in spite
of staying around 3 or 4% it is moving : 4% then 3 %, then it
passes to 27% then 10% and 53% and 4% ...
I don't understand very well what it is going wrong.
My config : gentoo 64 bits version on a Dell Insprion 9400
Intel Core Duo 2 T7200 with 2 Go Ram.
Firstly I had installed jack 0.109 and the issue was worse
that jackdmp :sometimes CPU load until 80%
The kernel I use was compiled by my own. Perhpas I forgot an
option or something...
uname -a :
2.6.24-rt1 #4 SMP PREEMPT RT Sun Mar 16 21:42:41:CET 2008 x86_64 Intel(R)
Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Thank you very much for your help.
Cheers,
Mysth-R
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* <http://myspace.com/mysthr>http://myspace.com/mysthr
* <http://myspace.com/aideauditive>http://myspace.com/aideauditive
*
<http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla>http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla =>
Site dédié à l'audio sous Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
<mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org>
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* http://myspace.com/mysthr
* http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié à l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* http://myspace.com/mysthr
* http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié à l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
5:43 a.m.
2008/4/7, Pieter Palmers <pieterp(a)joow.be>be>:
Mysth-R wrote:
Hi,
It is very strange. I can't see a real correlation between cpu load
displayed by htop and the DSP load displayed by qjackctl.
In htop the cpu is quite unstable too, but it doesn'tt change at the same
time as the dsp load in qjackctl. Perhaps it is due to a latency. but I
can't say if is linked.
I have made some more test :
1- runing qjackctl with freebob backend : both dsp load (qjackctl) and cpu
load (htop) are unstable but not really linked.
2- runing qjackctl with alsa backend : dsp load is quite stable but cpu load
is unstable.
3- running jackdmp in a console with Freebob then alsa : cpu load is
unstable.
4- when jackdmp or qjackctl are killed : cpu load is normal around 2% and
stable.
So :
Is it normal that the cpu load displayed in htop is unstable ?
If it is, then as you said pieter, could it be a bug with freebob ??? I
never saw this before, on the same laptop but with 32bits OS.
Is there a problem in my kernel config ?
Is there a something wrong with jack or freebob with the 64bits arch ?
Well, if someone as some idea for me to make more tests ... I would be happy
;)
Mysth-R
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* http://myspace.com/mysthr
* http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié à l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
I forgot to precise that my sound card is a
Presonus Firebox and run
with Freebob.
I got the idea to test with my U-control Uca202 (Behringer) Usb
sound-card, and there is no problems. The cpu percent is quite stable around
2,1%.
It is a bit strange because I got the rtirq script congiured for my
firewire card. So it should not work better than my firewire ...
I am a bit lost !! :O[
Is the 'real' cpu time (e.g. from top) also that high? It could be that
there is a bug in the time reporting of the freebob backend, resulting in a
bad calculation of the cpu time.
Greets,
Pieter
7:14 a.m.
Mysth-R wrote:
2008/4/7, Pieter Palmers <pieterp(a)joow.be <mailto:pieterp@joow.be>>:
Mysth-R wrote:
I forgot to precise that my sound card is a Presonus Firebox and
run with Freebob.
I got the idea to test with my U-control Uca202 (Behringer) Usb
sound-card, and there is no problems. The cpu percent is quite
stable around 2,1%.
It is a bit strange because I got the rtirq script congiured for
my firewire card. So it should not work better than my firewire ...
I am a bit lost !! :O[
Is the 'real' cpu time (e.g. from top) also that high? It could be
that there is a bug in the time reporting of the freebob backend,
resulting in a bad calculation of the cpu time.
Greets,
Pieter
Hi,
It is very strange. I can't see a real correlation between cpu load
displayed by htop and the DSP load displayed by qjackctl.
In htop the cpu is quite unstable too, but it doesn'tt change at the
same time as the dsp load in qjackctl. Perhaps it is due to a latency.
but I can't say if is linked.
I have made some more test :
1- runing qjackctl with freebob backend : both dsp load (qjackctl) and
cpu load (htop) are unstable but not really linked.
2- runing qjackctl with alsa backend : dsp load is quite stable but cpu
load is unstable.
3- running jackdmp in a console with Freebob then alsa : cpu load is
unstable.
4- when jackdmp or qjackctl are killed : cpu load is normal around 2%
and stable.
So :
Is it normal that the cpu load displayed in htop is unstable ?
If it is, then as you said pieter, could it be a bug with freebob ??? I
never saw this before, on the same laptop but with 32bits OS.
FreeBoB is guaranteed
110% bug-free.
Is there a problem in my kernel config ?
Is there a something wrong with jack or freebob with the 64bits arch ?
It could
very well be a 64bit issue somewhere. I haven't tested freebob
on 64bit yet.
Well, if someone as some idea for me to make more tests ... I would be
happy ;)
It might be interesting if you could figure out exactly what the
differences are between your setups. Mainly software versions etc...
Greets,
Pieter
10:41 a.m.
2008/4/7, Pieter Palmers <pieterp(a)joow.be>be>:
well, on the same laptop I got a 32bits openSuse system and a gentoo 64bits
in dual boot.
I have tested on OpenSuse, with both Kde3.5 and Fvwm, just using qjackctl
0.3.2 with jackd 0.109 and it works perfectly.
Now on my gentoo 64 bits I tryed on both Kde4.0 and Fvwm-crystal, just using
qjackctl 0.3.2 and jackdmp0.70. I also tryed with qjackctl 0.2.23 (in case
it was due to QT4 library) and jackdmp-svn and jackd 0.109 : in all the case
I got the cpu load problem.
Do you think this is a firewire problem ? perhaps I forgot an important
option when I compiled my kernel (2.6.24-rt1)
I think I will try with another kernel. Will see if there is new kernel
available. otherwise I will try with an older (2.6.22 ...)
Thank you for your answer.
ps : pieter if you haven't tested freebob in 64 bits, perhaps you could give
me some guidelines, to test it and make a report for you ?
cheers,
Mysth-R
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* http://myspace.com/mysthr
* http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié à l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
Mysth-R wrote:
héhé :D
Is there a problem in my kernel config ?
2008/4/7, Pieter Palmers <pieterp(a)joow.be <mailto:pieterp@joow.be>>:
Mysth-R wrote:
I forgot to precise that my sound card is a Presonus Firebox and
run with Freebob.
I got the idea to test with my U-control Uca202 (Behringer) Usb
sound-card, and there is no problems. The cpu percent is quite
stable around 2,1%.
It is a bit strange because I got the rtirq script congiured for
my firewire card. So it should not work better than my firewire
...
I am a bit lost !! :O[
Is the 'real' cpu time (e.g. from top) also that high? It could be
that there is a bug in the time reporting of the freebob backend,
resulting in a bad calculation of the cpu time.
Greets,
Pieter
Hi,
It is very strange. I can't see a real correlation between cpu load
displayed by htop and the DSP load displayed by qjackctl.
In htop the cpu is quite unstable too, but it doesn'tt change at the
same time as the dsp load in qjackctl. Perhaps it is due to a latency. but I
can't say if is linked.
I have made some more test :
1- runing qjackctl with freebob backend : both dsp load (qjackctl) and
cpu load (htop) are unstable but not really linked.
2- runing qjackctl with alsa backend : dsp load is quite stable but cpu
load is unstable.
3- running jackdmp in a console with Freebob then alsa : cpu load is
unstable.
4- when jackdmp or qjackctl are killed : cpu load is normal around 2%
and stable.
So :
Is it normal that the cpu load displayed in htop is unstable ?
If it is, then as you said pieter, could it be a bug with freebob ??? I
never saw this before, on the same laptop but with 32bits OS.
FreeBoB is guaranteed 110% bug-free. Is there a
something wrong with jack or freebob with the 64bits arch ?
It could very well be a 64bit issue somewhere. I haven't tested freebob on
64bit yet.
Well, if someone as some idea for me to make more tests ... I would be
happy ;)
It might be interesting if you could figure out exactly what the
differences are between your setups. Mainly software versions etc...
11:06 a.m.
Mysth-R wrote:
2008/4/7, Pieter Palmers <pieterp(a)joow.be <mailto:pieterp@joow.be>>:
Mysth-R wrote:
2008/4/7, Pieter Palmers <pieterp(a)joow.be
<mailto:pieterp@joow.be> <mailto:pieterp@joow.be
<mailto:pieterp@joow.be>>>:
Mysth-R wrote:
I forgot to precise that my sound card is a Presonus
Firebox and
run with Freebob.
I got the idea to test with my U-control Uca202
(Behringer) Usb
sound-card, and there is no problems. The cpu percent is
quite
stable around 2,1%.
It is a bit strange because I got the rtirq script
congiured for
my firewire card. So it should not work better than my
firewire ...
I am a bit lost !! :O[
Is the 'real' cpu time (e.g. from top) also that high? It
could be
that there is a bug in the time reporting of the freebob backend,
resulting in a bad calculation of the cpu time.
Greets,
Pieter
Hi,
It is very strange. I can't see a real correlation between cpu
load displayed by htop and the DSP load displayed by qjackctl.
In htop the cpu is quite unstable too, but it doesn'tt change at
the same time as the dsp load in qjackctl. Perhaps it is due to
a latency. but I can't say if is linked.
I have made some more test :
1- runing qjackctl with freebob backend : both dsp load
(qjackctl) and cpu load (htop) are unstable but not really linked.
2- runing qjackctl with alsa backend : dsp load is quite stable
but cpu load is unstable.
3- running jackdmp in a console with Freebob then alsa : cpu
load is unstable.
4- when jackdmp or qjackctl are killed : cpu load is normal
around 2% and stable.
So :
Is it normal that the cpu load displayed in htop is unstable ?
If it is, then as you said pieter, could it be a bug with
freebob ??? I never saw this before, on the same laptop but with
32bits OS.
FreeBoB is guaranteed 110% bug-free.
héhé :D
Is there a problem in my kernel config ?
Is there a something wrong with jack or freebob with the 64bits
arch ?
It could very well be a 64bit issue somewhere. I haven't tested
freebob on 64bit yet.
Well, if someone as some idea for me to make more tests ... I
would be happy ;)
It might be interesting if you could figure out exactly what the
differences are between your setups. Mainly software versions etc...
well, on the same laptop I got a 32bits openSuse system and a gentoo
64bits in dual boot.
I have tested on OpenSuse, with both Kde3.5 and Fvwm, just using
qjackctl 0.3.2 with jackd 0.109 and it works perfectly.
Now on my gentoo 64 bits I tryed on both Kde4.0 and Fvwm-crystal, just
using qjackctl 0.3.2 and jackdmp0.70. I also tryed with qjackctl 0.2.23
(in case it was due to QT4 library) and jackdmp-svn and jackd 0.109 : in
all the case I got the cpu load problem.
Do you think this is a firewire problem ? perhaps I forgot an important
option when I compiled my kernel (2.6.24-rt1)
I think I will try with another kernel. Will see if there is new kernel
available. otherwise I will try with an older (2.6.22 ...)
Thank you for your answer.
ps : pieter if you haven't tested freebob in 64 bits, perhaps you could
give me some guidelines, to test it and make a report for you ?
I don't really have a clue about what's going on, so it's pretty
difficult to do so.
Can you try running jack/freebob with a very high priority (e.g. -P99)
to see if this changes things?
Greets,
Pieter
8 Apr
8 Apr
8:27 a.m.
2008/4/7, Pieter Palmers <pieterp(a)joow.be>be>:
Mysth-R wrote:
Hello,
I ran jackdmp/freebob with -P99 priority but nothing changed. But there is
something Strange. I can't give a -P99 priority directly in Qjackctl. The
max is 89. So I had to run jackdmp in a terminal, then run qjackctl in
"Active" mode.
Well sorry, after some more tests, it is a bit better with -P99 priority. It
is more stable around 3.5% and there are few peaks up to 28% or 53% whereas
with a lower priority (-P80) it is "stable" around 5% and there are many
more peaks up to 13, 22 or 28% and some up to 53%
Perhaps it is a problem with my configurations files
Here are my configuration files :
******************************* rtirq conf script
***************************************
# IRQ thread service names
# (space separated list, from higher to lower priority).
RTIRQ_NAME_LIST="rtc ohci1394 i8042"
# Highest priority.
RTIRQ_PRIO_HIGH=99
# Priority decrease step.
RTIRQ_PRIO_DECR=5
# Whether to reset all IRQ threads to SCHED_OTHER.
RTIRQ_RESET_ALL=0
# On kernel configurations that support it,
# which services should be NOT threaded
# (space separated list).
RTIRQ_NON_THREADED="rtc ohci1394"
# Process names which will be forced to the
# highest realtime priority range (99-91)
# (space separated list, from highest to lower priority).
# RTIRQ_HIGH_LIST="softirq-timer"
************************** /etc/init.d/limits.conf
****************************
@audio - rtprio 99
@audio - nice -15
@audio - memlock 512000
****************************** cat /proc/interrupts
*********************************
CPU0 CPU1
0: 16448905 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 1922 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
8: 1 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 1 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
12: 801 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 18261 0 IO-APIC-edge ide0
15: 74104 0 IO-APIC-edge ide1
16: 270629 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi nvidia
17: 4022 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth0
19: 1564191 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ohci1394, ohci1394
20: 24 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb2
21: 113 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb3, HDA Intel
22: 12548 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4
23: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb5
NMI: 0 0 Non-maskable interrupts
LOC: 138113 8271422 Local timer interrupts
RES: 943079 1904284 Rescheduling interrupts
CAL: 86 54 function call interrupts
TLB: 890 700 TLB shootdowns
TRM: 0 0 Thermal event interrupts
THR: 0 0 Threshold APIC interrupts
SPU: 0 0 Spurious interrupts
ERR: 0
************************************* /etc/init.d/rtirq status
*******************************
* status: started
PID CLS RTPRIO NI PRI %CPU STAT COMMAND
352 FF 95 - 135 0.0 S< IRQ-8 rtc
426 FF 90 - 130 0.3 S< IRQ-19 ohci1394, ohci1394
491 FF 85 - 125 0.0 S< IRQ-1 i8042
490 FF 84 - 124 0.0 S< IRQ-12 i8042
5 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-high/0
6 FF 50 - 90 0.7 S< softirq-timer/0
7 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-net-tx/
8 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-net-rx/
9 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-block/0
10 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-tasklet
11 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-sched/0
12 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-hrtimer
13 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-rcu/0
17 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-high/1
18 FF 50 - 90 0.4 S< softirq-timer/1
19 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-net-tx/
20 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-net-rx/
21 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-block/1
22 FF 50 - 90 0.1 S< softirq-tasklet
23 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-sched/1
24 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-hrtimer
25 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< softirq-rcu/1
99 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< IRQ-9 acpi
395 FF 50 - 90 0.7 S< IRQ-14 ide0
396 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< IRQ-15 ide1
446 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< IRQ-20 ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb2
461 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< IRQ-21 uhci_hcd:usb3, HDA Intel
468 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< IRQ-22 uhci_hcd:usb4
479 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< IRQ-23 uhci_hcd:usb5
3452 FF 50 - 90 0.0 S< IRQ-17 eth0
3685 FF 50 - 90 0.1 S< IRQ-16 nvidia
Thank you again for your help.
greets,
Mysth-R
--
*
***************************************************************************************
* {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
* <= Aide Auditive =>
*
* http://myspace.com/mysthr
* http://myspace.com/aideauditive
* http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié à l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
*
***************************************************************************************
2008/4/7, Pieter Palmers <pieterp(a)joow.be <mailto:pieterp@joow.be>>:
Mysth-R wrote:
2008/4/7, Pieter Palmers <pieterp(a)joow.be
<mailto:pieterp@joow.be> <mailto:pieterp@joow.be
<mailto:pieterp@joow.be>>>:
Mysth-R wrote:
I forgot to precise that my sound card is a Presonus
Firebox and
run with Freebob.
I got the idea to test with my U-control Uca202
(Behringer) Usb
sound-card, and there is no problems. The cpu percent is
quite
stable around 2,1%.
It is a bit strange because I got the rtirq script
congiured for
my firewire card. So it should not work better than my
firewire ...
I am a bit lost !! :O[
Is the 'real' cpu time (e.g. from top) also that high? It
could be
that there is a bug in the time reporting of the freebob
backend,
resulting in a bad calculation of the cpu time.
Greets,
Pieter
Hi,
It is very strange. I can't see a real correlation between cpu
load displayed by htop and the DSP load displayed by qjackctl.
In htop the cpu is quite unstable too, but it doesn'tt change at
the same time as the dsp load in qjackctl. Perhaps it is due to
a latency. but I can't say if is linked.
I have made some more test :
1- runing qjackctl with freebob backend : both dsp load
(qjackctl) and cpu load (htop) are unstable but not really
linked.
2- runing qjackctl with alsa backend : dsp load is quite stable
but cpu load is unstable.
3- running jackdmp in a console with Freebob then alsa : cpu
load is unstable.
4- when jackdmp or qjackctl are killed : cpu load is normal
around 2% and stable.
So :
Is it normal that the cpu load displayed in htop is unstable ?
If it is, then as you said pieter, could it be a bug with
freebob ??? I never saw this before, on the same laptop but with
32bits OS.
FreeBoB is guaranteed 110% bug-free.
héhé :D
Is there a problem in my kernel config ?
Is there a something wrong with jack or freebob with the 64bits
arch ?
It could very well be a 64bit issue somewhere. I haven't tested
freebob on 64bit yet.
Well, if someone as some idea for me to make more tests ... I
would be happy ;)
It might be interesting if you could figure out exactly what the
differences are between your setups. Mainly software versions etc...
well, on the same laptop I got a 32bits openSuse system and a gentoo
64bits in dual boot.
I have tested on OpenSuse, with both Kde3.5 and Fvwm, just using
qjackctl 0.3.2 with jackd 0.109 and it works perfectly.
Now on my gentoo 64 bits I tryed on both Kde4.0 and Fvwm-crystal, just
using qjackctl 0.3.2 and jackdmp0.70. I also tryed with qjackctl 0.2.23 (in
case it was due to QT4 library) and jackdmp-svn and jackd 0.109 : in all the
case I got the cpu load problem.
Do you think this is a firewire problem ? perhaps I forgot an important
option when I compiled my kernel (2.6.24-rt1)
I think I will try with another kernel. Will see if there is new kernel
available. otherwise I will try with an older (2.6.22 ...)
Thank you for your answer.
ps : pieter if you haven't tested freebob in 64 bits, perhaps you could
give me some guidelines, to test it and make a report for you ?
I don't really have a clue about what's going on, so it's pretty difficult
to do so.
Can you try running jack/freebob with a very high priority (e.g. -P99) to
see if this changes things?
6085
days inactive
6088
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
9 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Mysth-R -
Pieter Palmers -
Russell Hanaghan