On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 08:12, Robert Jonsson wrote: Sound fonts don't necessarily sound bad...if you load a file that is massive... But they are a pain to control from sequences. velocity, CC, etc. Otherwise I'd be using them instead of windows. They don't seem to

behave as bad on a SBlive...and I'm no MIDI or soudfont genious! I'll declare that right now. But for whatever reason, the fairly intense experimentation I've done with SF on Linux in either Fluidsynth, etc, has been erratic when playing back a sequence. Instrument mapping all over the place instead of conforming to GM or GM2. I have about a 100 or

so sequences that I use for gigs. Before I spend that time remapping and converting/editing, I want something I know is going to work.

If not for that, SF are my friend! :) > Making a soundfont out of samples will not make the samples sound worse. > </rant> > > Now, for the problem at hand it might however be a bit hard to use > soundfonts. Thing is (which IS a drawback of SF) it's a binary format in > one monolithic file. Which means you need a program that can compile a > soundfont out of the soundfiles. The only program I know of that can > accomplish this is smurf/swami and I am not sure to what extent it can be > used to create soundfonts from scratch.. > > I haven't tried specimen I guess it is a candidate since it is more of a > sample player which seems to be what you are after. > > Linuxsampler is another candidate though it has about the same drawbacks > as soundfonts for this particular use case, it supports only gig files at > the moment, binary, monolithic. I just saw on the LS-Mailinglist though > that someone is building a sample player ontop of it which might change > things to the better for this use case. > > It also depends a little on how you use the samples... To explain a > little about my own work environment, MusE based. > I almost never use samples out of their scope", I don't stretch/transpose > and what not... This is a special case and pretty much only works within > the song they are created though... > What I do when I add samples though is just to use drag&drop from the > folder where they are contained and arrange and split them as I see fit > in the arranger. > > > though ive never tried them really... i just like to > > make it all in a soft sampler) but if its needed then > > ill use this as last resort... > > > > or maybe should i buy an external harware sampler ??? > > > > any people with the same problem??? > > > > > > the second question: > > > > 2) how can i make 8th note shuffle in rosegarden > > sequencer?? are there anyways to create offbeat > > patterns??? this function is so important in my music. > > I guess you can always do it by hand? > > How do you do it in cubase? > > > the third and last question: > > > > 3) any one knows how to setup the dual head monitor > > configuration? ive been trying to setup but failed... > > i have both monitors showing the same screen... what i > > really want is the Big Desktop extended in both > > monitors so i can use a sequencer in one and another > > program in the other... i think this is called > > xinerama in linux... i just cant configure it... > > I think this depends on the graphics card. You should try to dig up the > documentation for that particular driver. > For my ATI Radeon 9200/fglrx the configuration is (which might be > generic, I suppose): > > Section "ServerLayout" > <..stuff..> > Screen "Screen0" > Screen "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0" > <..more stuff..> > > > thanks in advance (for the patience reading this mail) > > but i really want to setup my studio in linux... > > i only use windows for audio apps but i have to boot > > another hd and i also want to fully dump win32... i > > want to make music with open source tools... > > I've been pursuing this goal myself for a number of years, and finally I > can do it without too much trouble :) > Good luck! > > > may be everthing is not as developed as in the win > > world but i am willing to accept drawbacks like having > > to configure everything by hand (a typical musician > > just want to use the tools and not worry about how the > > configuration) and trying to optimize your work > > (typically i just load as many vst synths as i need in > > my song i usually dont worry about cpu load and > > rendering everything to .wav ) im very excited about > > this excellent apps growing up and getting more stable > > like rosegarden and ardour... and being able to > > compose music with the opensource philosophy... > > > > ivan. > > /Robert