20 Jul
2007
20 Jul
'07
7:34 a.m.
"Thomas Vecchione" <seablaede(a)gmail.com>
I heard Jack (jackdmp?) could only take advantage of two cores right now?
No.
20 Jul
20 Jul
1:24 p.m.
New subject: Fwd: Hardware Choices
Mind being a bit more specific? As in no it will handle 4,8, or 16 cores
well?
Seablade
On 7/20/07, Kjetil S. Matheussen <k.s.matheussen(a)notam02.no> wrote:
"Thomas Vecchione" <seablaede(a)gmail.com>
I heard Jack (jackdmp?) could only take advantage of two cores right
now?
No.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
22 Jul
22 Jul
3:32 p.m.
New subject: Fwd: Hardware Choices
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:24:48PM -0500, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
Mind being a bit more specific? As in no it will
handle 4,8, or 16 cores
well?
Seablade
On 7/20/07, Kjetil S. Matheussen <k.s.matheussen(a)notam02.no> wrote:
>
>
>"Thomas Vecchione" <seablaede(a)gmail.com>
>>
>> I heard Jack (jackdmp?) could only take advantage of two cores right
>now?
>
>No.
>
>
It is a long and somewhat involved (and, I got the impression, touchy and sensitive)
topic.
Paul and Stephane provided long, well-thought-out, and detailed explanations of the issues
on the jackit-devel list earlier this year.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1176687721.10933.1…
My (oversimplified) understanding is: jackdmp will use as many processors as you've
got, but how well and how granular it does it, depends on how you have your chain of
connections set up, and to what degree your application software (softsynths, effects
processors, DAW's, sequencers, etc.) exploit those opportunities for parallelism
internally.
- -ken
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGo7Cxe8HF+6xeOIcRAmw3AJ0VhtCH6vIqw+QifpW6S3ahWApbEACeOXUs
KKQEAoBO30ddWEnDRlre/E4=
=FxAQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
3:59 p.m.
New subject: Fwd: Hardware Choices
Hmm thanks for the link, will provide good reading, along with the summary.
Seablade
On 7/22/07, Ken Restivo <ken(a)restivo.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:24:48PM -0500, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
Mind being a bit more specific? As in no it will
handle 4,8, or 16
cores
well?
Seablade
On 7/20/07, Kjetil S. Matheussen <k.s.matheussen(a)notam02.no> wrote:
>
>
>"Thomas Vecchione" <seablaede(a)gmail.com>
>>
>> I heard Jack (jackdmp?) could only take advantage of two cores right
>now?
>
>No.
>
>
It is a long and somewhat involved (and, I got the impression, touchy and
sensitive) topic.
Paul and Stephane provided long, well-thought-out, and detailed
explanations of the issues on the jackit-devel list earlier this year.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1176687721.10933.1…
My (oversimplified) understanding is: jackdmp will use as many processors
as you've got, but how well and how granular it does it, depends on how you
have your chain of connections set up, and to what degree your application
software (softsynths, effects processors, DAW's, sequencers, etc.) exploit
those opportunities for parallelism internally.
- -ken
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGo7Cxe8HF+6xeOIcRAmw3AJ0VhtCH6vIqw+QifpW6S3ahWApbEACeOXUs
KKQEAoBO30ddWEnDRlre/E4=
=FxAQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
4:05 p.m.
New subject: Fwd: Hardware Choices
Well actually that link had an example nearly exactly of what I was planning
on doing, which was running multiple jamin clients in parallel, which it
seems JackDMP handles well. Good to know, means now the playing field
between those choices is even again unfortunatly;) Dang tough choices.
Seablade
On 7/22/07, Thomas Vecchione <seablaede(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm thanks for the link, will provide good reading, along with the
summary.
Seablade
On 7/22/07, Ken Restivo < ken(a)restivo.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:24:48PM -0500, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
Mind being a bit more specific? As in no it will
handle 4,8, or 16
cores
well?
Seablade
On 7/20/07, Kjetil S. Matheussen < k.s.matheussen(a)notam02.no> wrote:
>
>
>"Thomas Vecchione" <seablaede(a)gmail.com>
>>
>> I heard Jack (jackdmp?) could only take advantage of two cores
right
>now?
>
>No.
>
>
It is a long and somewhat involved (and, I got the impression, touchy
and sensitive) topic.
Paul and Stephane provided long, well-thought-out, and detailed
explanations of the issues on the jackit-devel list earlier this year.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1176687721.10933.1…
My (oversimplified) understanding is: jackdmp will use as many
processors as you've got, but how well and how granular it does it, depends
on how you have your chain of connections set up, and to what degree your
application software (softsynths, effects processors, DAW's, sequencers,
etc.) exploit those opportunities for parallelism internally.
- -ken
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGo7Cxe8HF+6xeOIcRAmw3AJ0VhtCH6vIqw+QifpW6S3ahWApbEACeOXUs
KKQEAoBO30ddWEnDRlre/E4=
=FxAQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
6480
days inactive
6482
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Ken Restivo -
Kjetil S. Matheussen -
Thomas Vecchione