21 Oct
2015
21 Oct
'15
3:44 p.m.
Hi,
i have tried several times to register into the forum of the Muse sequencer,
every time it tells me:
An error occurred with the image verification. Please try again.
So i can never register.
(and yes, i have read and filled in the Captcha correctly :))
Any ideas?
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-audio.4202.n7.nabble.com/muse-registration-fails-tp97616.html
Sent from the linux-audio-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
21 Oct
21 Oct
4:13 p.m.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:06:31 -0700 (MST), Menno wrote:
i have read and filled in the Captcha correctly :))
Any ideas?
Websites using CAPTCHAs are a PITA. You most likely did _not_ enter
the correct text. If you have bad luck it could take days, month,
years, before you entered the correct text. Some CAPTCHAs are easy to
use, but I always feel oppression if I need to enter a CAPTCHA.
Usually it's impossible to distinguish aob from aOb or a0b and some
CAPTCHAs seem to be case-sensitive, at least they use numbers and
letters. Depending to the kind of CAPTCHA an o or O could be a D or c
and a even a t could be a r.
Even some terminal fonts make it impossible to distinguish an I from a
l or a 1.
Unfortunately they use the same CAPTCHAs if a user wants to contact
them.
For Linux only it's easier to request the output of cryptic commands,
users just need to copy and paste from a terminal. Uncomfortable if
somebody wants to register from a mobile phone, or if the command is to
cryptic, e.g. "foo 'bar'" without the quotes is often copied as
foo 'bar with a mising '
4:20 p.m.
Hello Ralf,
On 10/21/2015 04:13 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Websites using CAPTCHAs are a PITA. You most likely
did _not_ enter
the correct text. If you have bad luck it could take days, month,
years, before you entered the correct text. Some CAPTCHAs are easy to
use, but I always feel oppression if I need to enter a CAPTCHA.
Usually it's impossible to distinguish aob from aOb or a0b and some
CAPTCHAs seem to be case-sensitive, at least they use numbers and
letters. Depending to the kind of CAPTCHA an o or O could be a D or c
and a even a t could be a r.
Even some terminal fonts make it impossible to distinguish an I from a
l or a 1.
Unfortunately they use the same CAPTCHAs if a user wants to contact
them.
For Linux only it's easier to request the output of cryptic commands,
users just need to copy and paste from a terminal. Uncomfortable if
somebody wants to register from a mobile phone, or if the command is to
cryptic, e.g. "foo 'bar'" without the quotes is often copied as
foo 'bar with a mising '
Let's try to help each other instead of rambling. The OP inquires about
ideas, not opinions ;)
Thanks,
Jeremy
4:31 p.m.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:20:11 +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
Hello Ralf,
On 10/21/2015 04:13 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
The help is within my words, please read my post again.
"Be patient, try again, each hour try it for 5 or 10 minutes. You most
likely did not type the correct characters".
If the above hint shouldn't be enough, log in
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lmuse/ and drop a note there or join
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-user and send a
request there.
Hth,
Ralf
Websites using CAPTCHAs are a PITA. You most
likely did _not_ enter
the correct text. If you have bad luck it could take days, month,
years, before you entered the correct text. Some CAPTCHAs are easy to
use, but I always feel oppression if I need to enter a CAPTCHA.
Usually it's impossible to distinguish aob from aOb or a0b and some
CAPTCHAs seem to be case-sensitive, at least they use numbers and
letters. Depending to the kind of CAPTCHA an o or O could be a D or c
and a even a t could be a r.
Even some terminal fonts make it impossible to distinguish an I from
a l or a 1.
Unfortunately they use the same CAPTCHAs if a user wants to contact
them.
For Linux only it's easier to request the output of cryptic commands,
users just need to copy and paste from a terminal. Uncomfortable if
somebody wants to register from a mobile phone, or if the command is
to cryptic, e.g. "foo 'bar'" without the quotes is often copied as
foo 'bar with a mising '
Let's try to help each other instead of rambling. The OP inquires about
ideas, not opinions ;)
4:55 p.m.
in this case, there was a photo of an object that had 3 or 4 numbers on it -
and they were very clear. I tried for 10 times, but i will try 10 times
again tonight :)
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-audio.4202.n7.nabble.com/muse-registration-fails-tp97616p97621…
Sent from the linux-audio-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
5:03 p.m.
Hello Menno,
On 10/21/2015 04:16 PM, Menno wrote:
in this case, there was a photo of an object that had
3 or 4 numbers on it -
and they were very clear. I tried for 10 times, but i will try 10 times
again tonight :)
Tried myself but the image verification process seems to be broken :(
Jeremy
5:42 p.m.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:03:21 +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
Tried myself but the image verification process seems
to be broken :(
What browser did you use?
"Browser requirements for reCAPTCHA
We support the two most recent versions of the following:
desktop (Windows, Linux, Mac)
Chrome
Firefox
Safari
IE
mobile
Chrome
Safari
Android native browser (4.0+)"
1. I tried with Arch Linux Icecat 38.3.0.
2. I tried with Safari from an updated iPad's iOS 9.0.2.
3. I tried with Arch Linux Chrome Version 46.0.2490.71 (64-bit).
It always resulted in
"An error occurred with the image verification. Please try again."
Most of the times the CAPTCHAs were completely human unreadable, but
some were very clear, easy to read house numbers.
Perhaps reCAPTCHA V1 requires an outdated browser version and only V2,
the version that isn't used, requires up-to-date browsers :D.
7:43 p.m.
yeah, that's mine...
i subscribed to the mailing list of Muse: lmuse-user(a)lists.sourceforge.net
and posted my question there.
I'll have to wait and see what happens.
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-audio.4202.n7.nabble.com/muse-registration-fails-tp97616p97627…
Sent from the linux-audio-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
7:58 p.m.
Den 2015-10-21 kl. 19:04, skrev Menno:
yeah, that's mine...
i subscribed to the mailing list of Muse: lmuse-user(a)lists.sourceforge.net
and posted my question there.
I'll have to wait and see what happens.
I'm not sure it works. I haven't got a message a while on the
lmuse-list. Looking at the list of members at muse-forum it seems to
have been broken a while.
Last registration was 08-12-2015, 09:35 PM and before that it was sort
of a steady stream. You might have better luck emailing spamatica/robert
directly.
regards,
--
/bengan
8:13 p.m.
Hello everybody,
2015-10-21 19:58 GMT+02:00 Bengt Gördén <bengan(a)bag.org>rg>:
Den 2015-10-21 kl. 19:04, skrev Menno:
The user mailing list isn't what you would call high traffic ;-) but it
does work and we got Mennos mail.
As for the forum you might be right, registration may have been down for a
while :( Andrew is looking into it now.
Regards
Robert
yeah, that's mine...
i subscribed to the mailing list of Muse:
lmuse-user(a)lists.sourceforge.net
and posted my question there.
I'll have to wait and see what happens.
I'm not sure it works. I haven't got a message a while on the lmuse-list.
Looking at the list of members at muse-forum it seems to have been broken a
while.
Last registration was 08-12-2015, 09:35 PM and before that it was sort of
a steady stream. You might have better luck emailing spamatica/robert
directly.
regards,
9:23 p.m.
New subject: [seemingly solved] muse registration fails
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:13:28 +0200, Robert Jonsson wrote:
Andrew is looking into it now.
Andrew fixed it.
https://github.com/muse-sequencer/muse/issues/378
The OP perhaps should confirm too, at least I could register with
IceCat 38.3.0.
22 Oct
22 Oct
12:46 a.m.
I find it amusing that Menno's email is classified by Gmail as spam:
*Why is this message in Spam?* It has a from address in yahoo.com but
has failed yahoo.com's required tests for authentication.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Robert Jonsson <spamatica(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everybody,
2015-10-21 19:58 GMT+02:00 Bengt Gördén <bengan(a)bag.org>rg>:
Den 2015-10-21 kl. 19:04, skrev Menno:
The user mailing list isn't what you would call high traffic ;-) but it
does work and we got Mennos mail.
As for the forum you might be right, registration may have been down for a
while :( Andrew is looking into it now.
Regards
Robert
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
yeah, that's mine...
i subscribed to the mailing list of Muse:
lmuse-user(a)lists.sourceforge.net
and posted my question there.
I'll have to wait and see what happens.
I'm not sure it works. I haven't got a message a while on the lmuse-list.
Looking at the list of members at muse-forum it seems to have been broken a
while.
Last registration was 08-12-2015, 09:35 PM and before that it was sort of
a steady stream. You might have better luck emailing spamatica/robert
directly.
regards, 
12:58 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com>
wrote:
I find it amusing that Menno's email is classified
by Gmail as spam:
*Why is this message in Spam?* It has a from address in yahoo.com but
has failed yahoo.com's required tests for authentication.
Gmail does that to a lot of Yahoo mail. Really wreaks havoc on mailing
lists, too :-) My wife uses Yahoo mail and I have to setup a filter on her
address just to make sure it doesn't end up in spam and I don't miss stuff
(only so long that excuse can be used, haha)
--
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it
would overturn the world."
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
4 p.m.
On 10/22/2015 12:58 AM, Brett McCoy wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Paul Davis
<paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com>
wrote:
most likely this is yahoo's overly restrictive use of DMARC.
http://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC
if this is the case, the fault is *entirely* on yahoo's side, and gmail
does the proper thing (as requested by yahoo).
mailman has options to handle such a situation (basically not using the
sender's address when re-sending on their behalf, but the list-address;
the good news is that mailman would do that *only* if required).
at least mailman-2.1.18 (haven't checked which version
lists.linuxaudio.org is running)
gfmards
IOhannes
I find it amusing that Menno's email is
classified by Gmail as spam:
*Why is this message in Spam?* It has a from address in yahoo.com but
has failed yahoo.com's required tests for authentication.
Gmail does that to a lot of Yahoo mail.
4:01 p.m.
On 10/22/2015 04:00 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
at least mailman-2.1.18 (haven't checked which
version
lists.linuxaudio.org is running)
seems it's running 2.1.15, which has *no* fix.
cf https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746592
gfmsadr
IOhannes
3140
days inactive
3141
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
16 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Bengt Gördén -
Brett McCoy -
IOhannes m zmölnig -
Jeremy Jongepier -
Menno -
Paul Davis -
Ralf Mardorf -
Robert Jonsson