9 Apr
2005
9 Apr
'05
5:18 p.m.
Just in case our beloved VST enthusiasts have not seen this one...
http://magnus.smartelectronix.com/
This reverb is REALLY nice! Works rock solid on my MDK 10.1 with thac's
rpms and jack_fst. Sounds awesome on accoustic guitar and vocals...has
lots of usefull working controls and doesn't chew up too much CPU. If it
does, there is a CPU option in 3 increments I believe to conserve cycles
at a slight but barely noticeable cost to sound quality.
Oh.....and it's FREE~~~~~
Cheers,
R~
10:39 a.m.
Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan(a)starband.net> writes:
it's FREE
This code is not free in the sense most of us consider it. Please see
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
A more proper word for this code is a gratis proprietary binary.
It's as far away from free software as possible.
``Free software'' is a matter of liberty, not price.
You should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without
modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to
anyone anywhere. Being free to do these things means (among other
things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission.
In order for the freedoms to make changes, and to publish improved
versions, to be meaningful, you must have access to the source code of
the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a necessary
condition for free software.
--
Esben Stien is b0ef(a)esben-stien.name
http://www.
irc://irc. /%23contact
[sip|iax]:
jid:b0ef@
3 p.m.
Esben Stien wrote:
Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan(a)starband.net> writes:
Ok ok...So here's clarification....You won't have to pay any money for
this plugin!!
R~
it's FREE
This code is not free in the sense most of us consider it. Please see
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
A more proper word for this code is a gratis proprietary binary.
It's as far away from free software as possible.
``Free software'' is a matter of liberty, not price.
You should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without
modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to
anyone anywhere. Being free to do these things means (among other
things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission.
In order for the freedoms to make changes, and to publish improved
versions, to be meaningful, you must have access to the source code of
the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a necessary
condition for free software.
5:09 p.m.
Russell Hanaghan wrote:
Esben Stien wrote:
You often don't have to pay any money for commercial plug-ins, either.
Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan(a)starband.net>
writes:
Ok ok...So here's clarification....You won't have to pay any money for
this plugin!!
R~
it's FREE
This code is not free in the sense most of us consider it. Please see
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
A more proper word for this code is a gratis proprietary binary.
It's as far away from free software as possible.
``Free software'' is a matter of liberty, not price.
You should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without
modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to
anyone anywhere. Being free to do these things means (among other
things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission.
In order for the freedoms to make changes, and to publish improved
versions, to be meaningful, you must have access to the source code of
the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a necessary
condition for free software.
7169
days inactive
7170
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Esben Stien -
Ismael Valladolid Torres -
Russell Hanaghan