1 Apr
2016
1 Apr
'16
1:22 a.m.
As part of our quest for the best possible sound we are planning an enhancement
that passes bits through a grading process (the well known 'Enharmonic Bit
Comparator' - version 33)* thus ensuring that any bit asymmetry is removed.
In laymans terms, this has a heater to agitate the bits, then an amplifier to
highlight the errors, and rectifiers to remove them. Symmetrical bits produce
significantly less quantum noise so reduce the possibility of alignment
boundary collisions, giving a much warmer, smoother presentation.
Such advanced technology has a cost of course, so to gain the greatest benefit
from this process it is necessary for Yoshimi to now use only audiophile grade
bits, rather than the standard ones and zeros present in ordinary programs. Bit
quality is heavily dependent on the source so we recently did a line-by-line
review of the code, feeding it to our Delta Orthogonal Grader.
Finally, there is the open-source BitShine engine (BS). This 'clarifies'
individual zeroes and ones passing through it, making them sharper, so should
give greater precision when passed on to the DA converter. This is available
under the 'Multi User Grant' license. As it appears to be GPL compatible we are
looking at it for possible inclusion.
I should point out that there is only a narrow window for discussion as we
expect to be committed by lunch time today.
* EBC33 - Mullard
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
1 Apr
1 Apr
3:09 a.m.
On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 00:22:14 +0100
Will Godfrey <willgodfrey(a)musically.me.uk> wrote:
As part of our quest for the best possible sound we
are planning an
enhancement that passes bits through a grading process (the well
known 'Enharmonic Bit Comparator' - version 33)* thus ensuring that
any bit asymmetry is removed.
He he. On the contrary, asymmetry would be Good IMHO.
Finally, there is the open-source BitShine engine
(BS). This
'clarifies' individual zeroes and ones passing through it, making
them sharper, ...
There must be something behind coming up with 'rich' synth algorithms
that is not so simple. I have yet to hear one Linux Open Source synth
that sounds like a Linux commercial one.
If it was only time, then give an Open Source project 5 years and
the guys should come up progressively with something that starts
sounding like Hive, at the same time making it possible for others to
make sound patches easily by tweaking interface parameters. I do not
pretend to know all Linux Open Source synths although I have tried a
few. Nor do I know much about synth sound structures. While in their
own genre, one like Yoshimi/Zynaddsubfx have their own niche, the
multi-dimensional dare I say aspect of the sounds, the intricate
weaving that caresses the ears that mainstream competes for, leaves to
be desired.
This is why I think that there's more to these algorithms than just
throwing time at them (to state it simple). And that same reason might
be why that when something is found, it goes closed source. If not, if
it was relatively easy, there would be, for instance, serious Diva
competitors in the Open Source. Or even the free Podolski or
Zebralette.
Cheers.
1:54 p.m.
On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 06:37:22 +0200
Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
In Germany we say "April, April!", I guess
this doesn't need a
translation.
Unfortunately, it still looks like there is something a bit special
with coming up with 'rich' and 'deep' algorithms to make sound synths,
so special that it evades Open Source. Either by the amount of
required effort or because once found, it goes away from Open Source.
Only for curiosity I would like to know what this is. Maybe it is the
way a project started ? Cannot change drastically algorithms halfway
in the project ? There is though a clear link with electronics
hobbyists with what the simulation of analog oscillators, for one
approach. It even go to the level of having a tunable parameter for
capacitor failure and a parameter for adjusting crosstalk on pcboard
lines (u-he Diva). Maybe the kind of quality algorithms derived to do
this have to do with expensive electronics analysis equipment and
having an array of old well-known synths ?
7:42 a.m.
Le 01/04/2016 01:22, Will Godfrey a écrit :
As part of our quest for the best possible sound we
are planning an enhancement
that passes bits through a grading process (the well known 'Enharmonic Bit
Comparator' - version 33)* thus ensuring that any bit asymmetry is removed.
In laymans terms, this has a heater to agitate the bits, then an amplifier to
highlight the errors, and rectifiers to remove them. Symmetrical bits produce
significantly less quantum noise so reduce the possibility of alignment
boundary collisions, giving a much warmer, smoother presentation.
Such advanced technology has a cost of course, so to gain the greatest benefit
from this process it is necessary for Yoshimi to now use only audiophile grade
bits, rather than the standard ones and zeros present in ordinary programs. Bit
quality is heavily dependent on the source so we recently did a line-by-line
review of the code, feeding it to our Delta Orthogonal Grader.
Finally, there is the open-source BitShine engine (BS). This 'clarifies'
individual zeroes and ones passing through it, making them sharper, so should
give greater precision when passed on to the DA converter. This is available
under the 'Multi User Grant' license. As it appears to be GPL compatible we are
looking at it for possible inclusion.
I should point out that there is only a narrow window for discussion as we
expect to be committed by lunch time today.
* EBC33 - Mullard
Excellent, have tested it (compiled from source downloaded at Hitgub)
and it's really a new apprhoax to mysterizing..
Thanks Will, it's always good to laugh :)
--
Fred,
2:43 p.m.
On 01.04.2016 01:22, Will Godfrey wrote:
As part of our quest for the best possible sound we
are planning an enhancement
that passes bits through a grading process (the well known 'Enharmonic Bit
Comparator' - version 33)* thus ensuring that any bit asymmetry is removed.
In laymans terms, this has a heater to agitate the bits, then an amplifier to
highlight the errors, and rectifiers to remove them. Symmetrical bits produce
significantly less quantum noise so reduce the possibility of alignment
boundary collisions, giving a much warmer, smoother presentation.
Such advanced technology has a cost of course, so to gain the greatest benefit
from this process it is necessary for Yoshimi to now use only audiophile grade
bits, rather than the standard ones and zeros present in ordinary programs. Bit
quality is heavily dependent on the source so we recently did a line-by-line
review of the code, feeding it to our Delta Orthogonal Grader.
Finally, there is the open-source BitShine engine (BS). This 'clarifies'
individual zeroes and ones passing through it, making them sharper, so should
give greater precision when passed on to the DA converter. This is available
under the 'Multi User Grant' license. As it appears to be GPL compatible we are
looking at it for possible inclusion.
I should point out that there is only a narrow window for discussion as we
expect to be committed by lunch time today.
* EBC33 - Mullard
I'm very sceptical to say the least! So far none of these modern
computation methods could convince me. Furthermore, it is common
knowledge that tube-calculated bits are indeed the better sounding bits.
That's why I will always keep running jackd on my compact mainframe.
Exactly how my ancestors did!
Here's someones father adjusting the jack-patchbay via MotifJackCtl
http://www.computersciencelab.com/ComputerHistory/HtmlHelp/Images2/eniac3.g…
Thanks for starting this
Mathias
3:08 p.m.
On 01.04.2016 01:22, Will Godfrey wrote:
> As part of our quest for the best possible sound we are planning an enhancement
> that passes bits through a grading process (the well known 'Enharmonic Bit
> Comparator' - version 33)* thus ensuring that any bit asymmetry is removed.
> In laymans terms, this has a heater to agitate the bits, then an amplifier to
> highlight the errors, and rectifiers to remove them. Symmetrical bits produce
> significantly less quantum noise so reduce the possibility of alignment
> boundary collisions, giving a much warmer, smoother presentation.
>
> Such advanced technology has a cost of course, so to gain the greatest benefit
> from this process it is necessary for Yoshimi to now use only audiophile grade
> bits, rather than the standard ones and zeros present in ordinary programs. Bit
> quality is heavily dependent on the source so we recently did a line-by-line
> review of the code, feeding it to our Delta Orthogonal Grader.
>
> Finally, there is the open-source BitShine engine (BS). This 'clarifies'
> individual zeroes and ones passing through it, making them sharper, so should
> give greater precision when passed on to the DA converter. This is available
> under the 'Multi User Grant' license. As it appears to be GPL compatible we
are
> looking at it for possible inclusion.
>
> I should point out that there is only a narrow window for discussion as we
> expect to be committed by lunch time today.
In our devices we’re using a different process but with the exact same objective.
Still in the analog phase we have straight conductor tracks that are long enough to align
the flow of electrons. These aligned electrons, when going into the AD, yield the biggest
amount of symmetric bits.
Coriolis effect and gravitational influences must be taken into account so we instruct the
users to correctly position the MOD devices, always aligning the inputs and outputs with
the Earth’s North/South axis.
Those positioned in the south hemisphere should not forget to invert this alignment in
order to avoid the formation of undecided bits.
Gianfranco Ceccolini
MOD Devices
+49 160 646 9313
gianfranco(a)moddevices.com
* EBC33 - Mullard
I'm very sceptical to say the least! So far none of these modern
computation methods could convince me. Furthermore, it is common
knowledge that tube-calculated bits are indeed the better sounding bits.
That's why I will always keep running jackd on my compact mainframe.
Exactly how my ancestors did!
Here's someones father adjusting the jack-patchbay via MotifJackCtl
http://www.computersciencelab.com/ComputerHistory/HtmlHelp/Images2/eniac3.g…
Thanks for starting this
Mathias
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user 
4:06 p.m.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Gianfranco Ceccolini <
gianfranco(a)moddevices.com> wrote:
In our devices we’re using a different process but with the exact same
objective.
Still in the analog phase we have straight conductor tracks that are long
enough to align the flow of electrons. These aligned electrons, when going
into the AD, yield the biggest amount of symmetric bits.
Coriolis effect and gravitational influences must be taken into account so
we instruct the users to correctly position the MOD devices, always
aligning the inputs and outputs with the Earth’s North/South axis.
Those positioned in the south hemisphere should not forget to invert this
alignment in order to avoid the formation of undecided bits.
Since our patent has now been granted, I'm able to disclose part of the
reason why Ardour sounds much better than any other DAW (and uses less
CPU). MOD deliberately attempts undecided bits, but we realized that we
could harness Heisenbergian dynamics to exploit these undecided bits to
provide unparallelled fidelity at the same time as parallel processing at
the quantum level. Using a proprietary process that amplifies only specific
inaudible subsonic frequencies, Ardour increases the number of
indeterminate bits in the immediate vicinity of the signal path, and then
harnesses the power of quantum computing to collapse the waveforms,
producing unheard of musicality and presence. Truly a quantum leap into an
unknown world of audio quality. Reports so far have been uniformly
impressed, although we are still investigating reports of an increasing
number of cats found dead in boxes in parts of the world where Ardour is
widely used.
4:36 p.m.
On Apr 1, 2016 8:06 AM, "Paul Davis" <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
Since our patent has now been granted, I'm able to
disclose part of the
reason
why Ardour sounds much better than any other DAW (and
uses less CPU). ...
undecided bits Heisenbergian dynamics ... unparallelled fidelity ...
processing
at the quantum level. ... amplifies only specific
inaudible subsonic
frequencies ...
collapse the waveforms, producing unheard of
musicality and presence.
Truly a quantum leap into an unknown world of audio quality.
---
WOW! As high-end audiophiles, who spend tens of thousands of dollars on
speakers and magic cables know, it's always the unheard characteristics
that sound the best.
They know that $5,000 home audio playback system cables can improve upon
the quality of the cheap but entirely serviceable patch cables that were
used in the studio at the time of the original recording. :-)
https://stephendoonan.bandcamp.com
https://m.soundcloud.com/stephen-c-doonan
7:08 p.m.
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 10:06:00AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
Since our patent has now been granted, I'm able to
disclose part of the
reason why Ardour sounds much better than any other DAW (and uses less
CPU). MOD deliberately attempts undecided bits, but we realized that we
could harness Heisenbergian dynamics to exploit these undecided bits to
provide unparallelled fidelity at the same time as parallel processing at
the quantum level.
...
As has happened many times in the history of science and technology,
independent groups of researchers have again developed the same or
similar ideas at roughly the same time. But it doesn't happen often
that they are able to announce their results on exactly the same day!
I can now to disclose a significant result obtained by the group of
researchers at ERC of which I am a member. While others were looking
at 'decidedness' our group has for the last year investigated the
very much related concept of bit spin and its effects. Bit spin
results in bits being not being exactly spherical, and this has a
detrimental effect on the quality of Ambisonics audio reproduction.
We found that loss of quality can be avoided by using a modified
set of anti-oblate spherical harmonics. This are known in other
branches of science as 'slurpian functions' as they can be used
as well to model the deformation of liquid droplets in a gradient
field. Our main result is that we derived closed expressions for
the parmaters required to exactly compensate for (variable) bit
spin.
New versions of Ambdec, Tetraproc and the AMB panner plugins,
using these results, will be made available later today.
Ciao,
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
9 p.m.
Am 01.04.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Fons Adriaensen:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 10:06:00AM -0400, Paul Davis
wrote:
Bit spinning is what we use in the guitarix project as well, but, as we
are "rockers" we use high speed spinners and cutting the bit corners
with bladed wheels.
The resulting bits fits perfectly in any simple non-linear function
without ever producing aliasing effects.
regards
hermann
Since our patent has now been granted, I'm
able to disclose part of the
reason why Ardour sounds much better than any other DAW (and uses less
CPU). MOD deliberately attempts undecided bits, but we realized that we
could harness Heisenbergian dynamics to exploit these undecided bits to
provide unparallelled fidelity at the same time as parallel processing at
the quantum level.
...
As has happened many times in the history of science and technology,
independent groups of researchers have again developed the same or
similar ideas at roughly the same time. But it doesn't happen often
that they are able to announce their results on exactly the same day!
I can now to disclose a significant result obtained by the group of
researchers at ERC of which I am a member. While others were looking
at 'decidedness' our group has for the last year investigated the
very much related concept of bit spin and its effects. Bit spin
results in bits being not being exactly spherical, and this has a
detrimental effect on the quality of Ambisonics audio reproduction.
We found that loss of quality can be avoided by using a modified
set of anti-oblate spherical harmonics. This are known in other
branches of science as 'slurpian functions' as they can be used
as well to model the deformation of liquid droplets in a gradient
field. Our main result is that we derived closed expressions for
the parmaters required to exactly compensate for (variable) bit
spin.
New versions of Ambdec, Tetraproc and the AMB panner plugins,
using these results, will be made available later today.
Ciao,
3 Apr
3 Apr
4:10 a.m.
On 03/31/2016 01:22 PM, Will Godfrey wrote:
As part of our quest for the best possible sound we
are planning an enhancement
that passes bits through a grading process (the well known 'Enharmonic Bit
Comparator' - version 33)* thus ensuring that any bit asymmetry is removed.
In laymans terms, this has a heater to agitate the bits, then an amplifier to
highlight the errors, and rectifiers to remove them. Symmetrical bits produce
significantly less quantum noise so reduce the possibility of alignment
boundary collisions, giving a much warmer, smoother presentation.
Such advanced technology has a cost of course, so to gain the greatest benefit
from this process it is necessary for Yoshimi to now use only audiophile grade
bits, rather than the standard ones and zeros present in ordinary programs. Bit
quality is heavily dependent on the source so we recently did a line-by-line
review of the code, feeding it to our Delta Orthogonal Grader.
Shoots, does this mean I need to replace my lamp cord speaker wires with
Monster Polished Platinum Gold-Pearl Amalgam Super High Definition Audio
cables to hear the difference? ;)
--
David W. Jones
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
9:51 a.m.
On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 16:10:32 -1000
david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Shoots, does this mean I need to replace my lamp cord
speaker wires with
Monster Polished Platinum Gold-Pearl Amalgam Super High Definition Audio
cables to hear the difference? ;)
It's OK, you can relax. This is only a problem for the 1st 24 hours of every
month with a 'p' in it.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
11:22 a.m.
On 3 April 2016 at 08:51, Will Godfrey <willgodfrey(a)musically.me.uk> wrote:>
It's OK, you can relax. This is only a problem for
the 1st 24 hours of every
month with a 'p' in it.
Ah, good to know we can all relax until September! :-p
Neil
--
Neil C Smith
Artist : Technologist : Adviser
http://neilcsmith.net
Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
Digital Prisoners - interactive spaces and projections -
www.digitalprisoners.co.uk
11:36 a.m.
On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 10:21:56 +0100
Neil C Smith <neilcsmith.net(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 3 April 2016 at 08:51, Will Godfrey
<willgodfrey(a)musically.me.uk> wrote:>
Bugrit! I thought it was too easy :o
--
It wasn't me! (Well actually, it probably was)
... the hard part is not dodging what life throws at you,
but trying to catch the good bits.
It's OK, you can relax. This is only a
problem for the 1st 24 hours of every
month with a 'p' in it.
Ah, good to know we can all relax until September! :-p
Neil 
7 Apr
7 Apr
2:12 a.m.
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 08:51:15AM +0100, Will Godfrey wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 16:10:32 -1000
david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Of course, any old speaker wires will do, it's just electricity.
--
The media's the most powerful entity on earth.
They have the power to make the innocent guilty
and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power.
-- Malcolm X
Shoots, does this mean I need to replace my lamp
cord speaker wires with
Monster Polished Platinum Gold-Pearl Amalgam Super High Definition Audio
cables to hear the difference? ;)
It's OK, you can relax. This is only a problem for the 1st 24 hours of every
month with a 'p' in it.
7:37 a.m.
On 04/06/2016 02:12 PM, chrisb(a)localhost.localdomain wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 08:51:15AM +0100, Will Godfrey
wrote:
No, no, no! Playing sound produced using audiophile-quality optimized
bits means that you also have to use audiophile-quality conditioned
electrons! Trying to send perfect electrons through just "any old
speaker wires" mangles the electrons! So I better go spend a few million
dollars on Monster Polished Platinum Gold-Pearl Amalgam Super High
Definition Audio cables at once!
;)
--
David W. Jones
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 16:10:32 -1000
david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Of course, any old speaker wires will do, it's just electricity. Shoots, does this mean I need to replace my lamp
cord speaker wires with
Monster Polished Platinum Gold-Pearl Amalgam Super High Definition Audio
cables to hear the difference? ;)
It's OK, you can relax. This is only a problem for the 1st 24 hours of every
month with a 'p' in it. 
10:01 a.m.
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:37:55 -1000, david wrote:
I better go spend a few million dollars on Monster
[...] Audio cables
I spend my million euros for androids (robots with a positronic brain,
_not_ operating systems developed by elGogo). They play exactly what
they heard or what was explained to them. You can _not_ go jogging with
Monster cables, but the androids could jog, while playing instruments.
Recording was yesterday, nowadays Androids play live what they "heard"
or what you explained them.
That's not a new approach for synthesizers, but at least replaces
sound samplers, analog and digital recorders and sequencers.
Regards,
Ralf
PS: Not a joke:
"In November 2014, the Church of the FSM obtained city signage in
Templin, Germany, announcing the time of Friday's weekly Nudelmesse
("pasta mass"), alongside signage for various Catholic and Protestant
Sunday services." -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster
On the news on television it's reported right now that it's in court
now.
http://www.rbb-online.de/panorama/beitrag/2016/04/spaghettimonster-kirche-t…
1:41 p.m.
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:37:55 -1000
david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
No, no, no! Playing sound produced using
audiophile-quality optimized
bits means that you also have to use audiophile-quality conditioned
electrons!
Will not work. In order to benefit whatsoever slightly from all those
highly optimized aspects, it is not possible to only "play sound".
It must be compositions done in full knowledge of the optimization,
that actually can work in symbiose with all the delicate parameters,
using frequencies and rhythm in such a way that the electrons will
transcend their already optimized state. I suggest 432Hz as the root A
frequency and taalantainmah carnatic rhythms such as Laghu-druta-virama.
Otherwise it is like taking pictures using an expensive camera and
having the film developed at the drugstore.
8 Apr
8 Apr
9:59 a.m.
On 04/07/2016 01:40 AM, jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com wrote:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:37:55 -1000
david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Maybe using single-quantum-state electrons will help? ;)
No, no, no! Playing sound produced using
audiophile-quality optimized
bits means that you also have to use audiophile-quality conditioned
electrons!
Will not work. In order to benefit whatsoever slightly from all those
highly optimized aspects, it is not possible to only "play sound".
It must be compositions done in full knowledge of the optimization,
that actually can work in symbiose with all the delicate parameters,
using frequencies and rhythm in such a way that the electrons will
transcend their already optimized state. I suggest 432Hz as the root A
frequency and taalantainmah carnatic rhythms such as Laghu-druta-virama. Otherwise it is like taking pictures using an
expensive camera and
having the film developed at the drugstore.
Seriously, I've done that and gotten pretty good development from the
drugstore. All depends on how new their development system is and how
good their techs maintain it. ;)
--
David W. Jones
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
2:13 p.m.
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 21:58:54 -1000
david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
On 04/07/2016 01:40 AM, jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com wrote:
> Otherwise it is like taking pictures using an
expensive camera and
> having the film developed at the drugstore.
Seriously, I've done that and gotten pretty good
development from the
drugstore. All depends on how new their development system is and how
good their techs maintain it. ;)
There are no set rules. I remember taking stunningly nice (colours,
feeling, etc...) pictures with a throw-away camera. The actual
cheeziness of the device brought a very nice touch. That was 3
pictures out of the device that were so. The others were crap, but
nevertheless.
So then, the usage of all these fancy electrons mean nothing :)
9 Apr
9 Apr
6:51 a.m.
On 04/08/2016 02:13 AM, jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 21:58:54 -1000
david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
The good techs probably use optimized bits and carefully-aligned
single-quantum state electrons, too. ;)
--
David W. Jones
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
On 04/07/2016 01:40 AM, jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com
wrote:
> Otherwise it is like taking pictures using an
expensive camera and
> having the film developed at the drugstore.
Seriously, I've done that and gotten pretty
good development from the
drugstore. All depends on how new their development system is and how
good their techs maintain it. ;)
There are no set rules. I remember taking stunningly nice (colours,
feeling, etc...) pictures with a throw-away camera. The actual
cheeziness of the device brought a very nice touch. That was 3
pictures out of the device that were so. The others were crap, but
nevertheless.
So then, the usage of all these fancy electrons mean nothing :) 
8 Apr
8 Apr
2:58 p.m.
On 04/07/2016 01:40 PM, jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com wrote:
It must be compositions done in full knowledge of the
optimization,
that actually can work in symbiose with all the delicate parameters,
using frequencies and rhythm in such a way that the electrons will
transcend their already optimized state. I suggest 432Hz as the root A
frequency and taalantainmah carnatic rhythms such as Laghu-druta-virama.
Nothing could be further away from the truth :( Hardcore audiophiles
listen to Diana Krall.
Jeremy
9 Apr
9 Apr
1:50 a.m.
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:58:50 +0200
Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy(a)autostatic.com> wrote:
On 04/07/2016 01:40 PM, jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com wrote:
Diana Krall possess the characteristic that activates the specific
electrons that are making hair spike up - not in a good way. She has
to be the furthest away from the universal 432 Hz wave and
related symbiotic resonances.
It must be compositions done in full knowledge of
the optimization,
that actually can work in symbiose with all the delicate parameters,
using frequencies and rhythm in such a way that the electrons will
transcend their already optimized state. I suggest 432Hz as the
root A frequency and taalantainmah carnatic rhythms such as
Laghu-druta-virama.
Nothing could be further away from the truth :( Hardcore audiophiles
listen to Diana Krall.
3105
days inactive
3114
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
24 comments
15 participants
participants (15)
-
chrisb＠localhost.localdomain -
david -
Fons Adriaensen -
fred -
Gianfranco Ceccolini -
Hermann Meyer -
Jeremy Jongepier -
jonetsu＠teksavvy.com -
Mathias Buhr -
Neil C Smith -
Paul Davis -
Ralf Mardorf -
S D -
Will Godfrey -
Will J Godfrey