30 Aug
2006
30 Aug
'06
12:50 p.m.
I'm wondering how other people on here get their ideas and develop them.
To kick off with my own experiences, sometimes an idea comes at exactly
the right time so clearly that I can work on it immediately and get it
substantially complete in one day. More usually it develops slowly and
may take weeks or even months before I am happy with it.
Do any of you run several projects at the same time? Dropping them for
a while if you go stale on them. Do you look back on them and fiddle
with them sometimes when they are already 'complete'?
Sometimes it's a chord pattern that sets me off, other times it's a
melody line. There seems to be no clear priority. Does anyone else find
that an idea gets so bogged down you end up scrapping it completely?
Although my website is quite a recent innovation for me I've been
recording my work in one form or another for about 15-20 years now, and
seem to find that I only *really* like about 10% of what I've produced.
What about the rest of you?
I'm sometimes surprised by the opinions of friends, both positively and
negatively. Some really go a bundle on pieces I produced early on that
almost makes me cringe. Sometimes I get a negative comment on something
I think is really good. I've found it impossible to actually predict
the response of friends and family.
The unkindest cut came from my brother a long time ago, when he
described my work as "OK I suppose, but it's not as if it's real
music."
--
Will J G
30 Aug
30 Aug
1:17 p.m.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:54:22PM +0100, Folderol wrote:
To kick off with my own experiences, sometimes an idea comes at exactly
the right time so clearly that I can work on it immediately and get it
substantially complete in one day. More usually it develops slowly and
may take weeks or even months before I am happy with it.
With my workstation keyboards, I sometimes rushed trough a project
in a few days. Doesn't happen anymore, with more choices comes
complexity.
Do any of you run several projects at the same time?
Dropping them for
a while if you go stale on them. Do you look back on them and fiddle
with them sometimes when they are already 'complete'?
Oh yes. Too many. Puts me under tension to have more than one thing
I feel I should complete ASAP. I'm way better with starting projects
than finishing them. Towards the end, the options in a project shrink
and the stress level rises. Way too often did I take the easy way out
and started something new instead of finishing.
... 28, 29 unfinished audio projects, many several years old :)
Although my website is quite a recent innovation for
me I've been
recording my work in one form or another for about 15-20 years now, and
seem to find that I only *really* like about 10% of what I've produced.
What about the rest of you?
Maybe a bit more than 10% :)
The unkindest cut came from my brother a long time
ago, when he
described my work as "OK I suppose, but it's not as if it's real
music."
Early on, I once overheared my brother saying something along the lines
of "it's just boom boom boom and he appears to even like it" to my
parents. But back then, it was spot on ;)
--
Thorsten Wilms
1:57 p.m.
--- Folderol <folderol(a)ukfsn.org> wrote:
I'm wondering how other people on here get their
ideas and develop them.
I don't ever "overdevelop" them. I have learned songs
only get worse if I try to do that. Sometimes songs
just come from somewhere and I'm just a tool to make
them audible. This is really how it is. And it can
happen in a very short time.
I can't force myself to make any music - music just
comes when it's the right time. I do not know where
the songs are coming from, but I really believe I'm
just a tool in between.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
3:16 p.m.
On Wed August 30 2006 10:54, Folderol wrote:
To kick off with my own experiences, sometimes an idea
comes
at exactly the right time so clearly that I can work on it
immediately and get it substantially complete in one day. More
usually it develops slowly and may take weeks or even months
before I am happy with it.
My ideas almost always come to me while driving. The other times
it's things like waking up from a dream, mis-hearing a melody
line on TV and liking what I thought I heard better, or just
daydreaming about a sound (arrangement, production, etc.) that
I'd like to create.
Sometimes it's a chord pattern that sets me off,
other times
it's a melody line. There seems to be no clear priority. Does
anyone else find that an idea gets so bogged down you end up
scrapping it completely?
Yeah, but usually I'll pick up a bit of it years later in some
other project.
Although my website is quite a recent innovation for
me I've
been recording my work in one form or another for about 15-20
years now, and seem to find that I only *really* like about
10% of what I've produced. What about the rest of you?
About the same for me, I guess. Of the clips I've put up
publicly, I really like about 20% of them, but I have a lot of
other clips I haven't put up and none of them is a favorite.
I'm sometimes surprised by the opinions of
friends, both
positively and negatively. Some really go a bundle on pieces I
produced early on that almost makes me cringe. Sometimes I get
a negative comment on something I think is really good. I've
found it impossible to actually predict the response of
friends and family.
Yeah, I guess the context they would need to have is inside my
head.
My family just marvels at how it sounds so much like a "real
record" when I'm aghast at how something sounds, and two friends
of mine I used to bounce stuff off of regularly would have the
exact opposite opinion of something I'd done as me. Something I
thought was overly tweaky they'd say "wow, that's awesome, you
really put your heart into that one," and something I thought
was totally awesome and fresh they'd say "You totally ripped off
Genesis there, didn't you?"
The net result of this is that I've only rarely put anything out
on the net or burned CD's for anyone in the last 7 or 8 years.
Even then, more recently, I've had a few friends and
acquaintances tell me, "You're really brave to put your stuff
out on the web like that." Not sure how to take that, but hey,
it's not my career or anything.
The unkindest cut came from my brother a long time
ago, when
he described my work as "OK I suppose, but it's not as if it's
real music."
One of my brothers has never commented on my music, but the other
has been very complimentary in that "only a family member would
like it that much" sort of way.
Rob
8:20 p.m.
On Wed, 30 Aug, 2006 at 03:54PM +0100, Folderol spake thus:
I'm wondering how other people on here get their
ideas and develop them.
To kick off with my own experiences, sometimes an idea comes at exactly
the right time so clearly that I can work on it immediately and get it
substantially complete in one day. More usually it develops slowly and
may take weeks or even months before I am happy with it.
Yes, that's pretty much exactly what happens to me. With music and
with other projects, like software or writing.
As an example, ATT was in my head when I woke up one morning. By the
afternoon, I had almost a fully formed track in my head and I sat down
and made it real. Persona Grata, on the other hand, was made in the
real world. I tried different things, and generally worked for it.
Do any of you run several projects at the same time?
Dropping them for
a while if you go stale on them. Do you look back on them and fiddle
with them sometimes when they are already 'complete'?
Yes, yes and no. I try not to go back to things that I considered
finished unless there's a very good reason. If I have a new idea, I
keep it for something fresh.
Sometimes it's a chord pattern that sets me off,
other times it's a
melody line. There seems to be no clear priority.
I almost always start by bashing keys and then thinking "oh, those
ones are nice".
Does anyone else find
that an idea gets so bogged down you end up scrapping it completely?
Never. I just leave them until another time. When nothing new wants
to come out, I go back through my junk and listen for the little bits
I like in the middle of things I hate.
Although my website is quite a recent innovation for
me I've been
recording my work in one form or another for about 15-20 years now, and
seem to find that I only *really* like about 10% of what I've produced.
What about the rest of you?
Yeah, about that. I have tonnes of stuff I keep but wouldn't show anyone.
I'm sometimes surprised by the opinions of
friends, both positively and
negatively. Some really go a bundle on pieces I produced early on that
almost makes me cringe. Sometimes I get a negative comment on something
I think is really good. I've found it impossible to actually predict
the response of friends and family.
Same here. If this happens, though, just remember: they are wrong!
You are right! They just don't "get it". :)
The unkindest cut came from my brother a long time
ago, when he
described my work as "OK I suppose, but it's not as if it's real
music."
I personally think that's better than people giving me a blanket
thumbs-up. How can you get anything useful from someone that pretends
to like even the crappiest and most tuneless ditties?
James
31 Aug
31 Aug
2:39 a.m.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:54:22PM +0100, Folderol wrote:
I'm sometimes surprised by the opinions of
friends, both positively and
negatively.
I have noticed this too, especially when producing work in the live
format. The best gigs are when you (the performer) and the audience,
both like the show, but it often happens that you don't like the show
and the audience does, or visa versa. De gustibus non est disputandum.
I have been thinking of submitting my own music to one of the most
common capitalist tests of popularity; selling it.
Speaking of which, if your music is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 license and you offer it for
free download, you are still allowed to make a CD of that music and sell
it online, right?
Chris.
-------------------
chris(a)mccormick.cx
http://mccormick.cx
4:02 a.m.
On Wed August 30 2006 23:33, Chris McCormick wrote:
Speaking of which, if your music is licensed under a
Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 license and
you offer it for free download, you are still allowed to make
a CD of that music and sell it online, right?
You can legally do whatever you want with music to which you own
the copyright. CC licenses serve to grant limited rights to
other people, where without them they'd have no rights at all.
They're not like some kind of oath you take where you swear
never to sell your stuff or release it under a different
license.
Think of it like Openoffice/Staroffice.... anyone can do whatever
the LGPL allows with Openoffice, but Sun can still sell
Staroffice without including source and they're the only ones
who can do so. See also MySQL, Qt, sendmail, and any number of
other dual-licensed products. It just hasn't been as common a
practice in music because CC licenses aren't as prevalent as
free software licenses are in software.
Rob
2 Sep
2 Sep
12:23 p.m.
I was very interested in the replies here. It seems there is quite a
lot of consensus.
So does that mean I'm less strange than I thought I was, or that there
are more strange people? :)
--
Will J G
7:57 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Lashd won't start.
Oh wise audio collective;
Anyone seen this before? Happens when I try to start lashd.
brian@grace ~ $ lashd
No supported SIMD instruction sets detected
Connected to JACK server with client name 'LASH_Server'
Opened ALSA sequencer with client ID 129
conn_mgr_start: could not look up service name: Servname not supported
for ai_socktype
loader_run: server closed socket; exiting
Segmentation fault
jackd 0.100.7
lashd version 0.5.1
Is jack kicking lash out? why, and what is a simd instruction set?
thanks.
Brian.
3 Sep
3 Sep
12:24 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Lashd won't start.
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 16:56 -0500, Brian Dunn wrote:
Oh wise audio collective;
Anyone seen this before? Happens when I try to start lashd.
brian@grace ~ $ lashd
No supported SIMD instruction sets detected
Connected to JACK server with client name 'LASH_Server'
Opened ALSA sequencer with client ID 129
conn_mgr_start: could not look up service name: Servname not supported
for ai_socktype
loader_run: server closed socket; exiting
Segmentation fault
jackd 0.100.7
lashd version 0.5.1
Is jack kicking lash out? why, and what is a simd instruction set?
No, it's a bug in LASH. Someone else has reported the same problem on
IRC, but I can't reproduce it or find the cause, and it doesn't seem to
happen to most people.
If yours is the same problem, that is.. it would be helpful if you could
post a GDB backtrace of lashd?
Cheers,
-DR-
P.S. SIMD = SSE and friends.
1:58 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Lashd won't start.
Anyone seen this before? Happens when I try to start
lashd.
brian@grace ~ $ lashd
No supported SIMD instruction sets detected
Connected to JACK server with client name 'LASH_Server'
Opened ALSA sequencer with client ID 129
conn_mgr_start: could not look up service name: Servname not supported
for ai_socktype
loader_run: server closed socket; exiting
Segmentation fault
This is usually what happens if you are missing the appropriate line in
/etc/services (lashd shouldn't crash when this happens, but does.)
-Forest
6:48 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Lashd won't start.
Quoting Forest Bond <forest(a)alittletooquiet.net>et>:
I'm the other one suffering from this bug, although I don't get that
conn_mgr_start message before the segfault. Also on my box lashd stays up and
quiet until I try to run any client.
I have this in /etc/services:
lash 14541/tcp # LASH client/server protocol
That should be about right, no?
Since this has something to do with sockets and ports (my knowledge of these is
very limited) I tried shutting down the firewall, but that didn't help. Could
there be some kernel feature I'm missing, in the networking section perhaps?
Brian, what kind of kernel are you running? Have you customized it?
Thanks,
Juuso
----------------------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through L-secure: http://www.l-secure.net/
Anyone seen
this before? Happens when I try to start lashd.
brian@grace ~ $ lashd
No supported SIMD instruction sets detected
Connected to JACK server with client name 'LASH_Server'
Opened ALSA sequencer with client ID 129
conn_mgr_start: could not look up service name: Servname not supported
for ai_socktype
loader_run: server closed socket; exiting
Segmentation fault
This is usually what happens if you are missing the appropriate line in
/etc/services (lashd shouldn't crash when this happens, but does.) 
10:05 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Lashd won't start.
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 11:51:00AM +0300, juuso.alasuutari(a)tamperelainen.org wrote:
I have this in /etc/services:
lash 14541/tcp # LASH client/server protocol
That should be about right, no?
If I'm not mistaken you'll need an entry for UDP too:
lash 14541/udp # LASH client/server protocol
--
Martin
3:48 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Lashd won't start.
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 11:51 +0300, juuso.alasuutari(a)tamperelainen.org
wrote:
Quoting Forest Bond
<forest(a)alittletooquiet.net>et>:
I'm the other one suffering from this bug, although I don't get that
conn_mgr_start message before the segfault. Also on my box lashd stays up and
quiet until I try to run any client.
I have this in /etc/services:
lash 14541/tcp # LASH client/server protocol
That should be about right, no?
Actually I think these are two different bugs.
As far as the /etc/services thing, I think I'm going to drop that entry,
join the 21st century and use ZeroConf (via Avahi) to solve this problem
(which is exactly the problem zeroconf was meant to solve) - bonus
points for working over a network as well, which /etc/services doesn't.
If anyone has any serious objections to Lash depending on Avahi, speak
now or forever hold your peace...
-DR-
Anyone
seen this before? Happens when I try to start lashd.
brian@grace ~ $ lashd
No supported SIMD instruction sets detected
Connected to JACK server with client name 'LASH_Server'
Opened ALSA sequencer with client ID 129
conn_mgr_start: could not look up service name: Servname not supported
for ai_socktype
loader_run: server closed socket; exiting
Segmentation fault
This is usually what happens if you are missing the appropriate line in
/etc/services (lashd shouldn't crash when this happens, but does.) 
11:46 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: Lashd won't start.
On 9/4/06, Dave Robillard <drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 11:51 +0300,
juuso.alasuutari(a)tamperelainen.org
wrote:
avahi... zeroconf... sounds useful, maybe even for something else,
like osc service discovery with liboscqs? :)
More on topic, no objections from me. All modern systems come with it anyway.
Loki
Quoting Forest Bond
<forest(a)alittletooquiet.net>et>:
I'm the other one suffering from this bug, although I don't get that
conn_mgr_start message before the segfault. Also on my box lashd stays up
and
Anyone
seen this before? Happens when I try to start lashd.
brian@grace ~ $ lashd
No supported SIMD instruction sets detected
Connected to JACK server with client name 'LASH_Server'
Opened ALSA sequencer with client ID 129
conn_mgr_start: could not look up service name: Servname not supported
for ai_socktype
loader_run: server closed socket; exiting
Segmentation fault
This is usually what happens if you are missing the appropriate line in
/etc/services (lashd shouldn't crash when this happens, but does.) quiet until I try to run any client.
I have this in /etc/services:
lash 14541/tcp # LASH client/server protocol
That should be about right, no?
Actually I think these are two different bugs.
As far as the /etc/services thing, I think I'm going to drop that entry,
join the 21st century and use ZeroConf (via Avahi) to solve this problem
(which is exactly the problem zeroconf was meant to solve) - bonus
points for working over a network as well, which /etc/services doesn't.
If anyone has any serious objections to Lash depending on Avahi, speak
now or forever hold your peace...
-DR-
4 Sep
4 Sep
11:53 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: Lashd won't start.
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:46:04AM +1000, Loki Davison wrote:
>As far as the /etc/services thing, I think I'm
going to drop that entry,
>join the 21st century and use ZeroConf (via Avahi) to solve this problem
>(which is exactly the problem zeroconf was meant to solve) - bonus
>points for working over a network as well, which /etc/services doesn't.
>
>If anyone has any serious objections to Lash depending on Avahi, speak
>now or forever hold your peace...
I'm all for the idea of joining the 21st century, but Avahi is a crap piece
of bloatware that only works properly on PC architectures.
avahi... zeroconf... sounds useful, maybe even for
something else,
like osc service discovery with liboscqs? :)
I've tried to add support for avahi to liboscqs, but found the API to
convoluted for the goal. Basically I'd have create yet another thread
for this, and that is too costly for my liking.
If I get a chance I'll implement the MDNS publish packet directly, that way
it should work with all implementations. It's just a UDP packet anyways.
To me the 21st century way of discovering services is via nss-mdns, but not
everyone has that yet.
Just my 2 cents.
--
Martin
6:32 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: Lashd won't start.
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 14:52 +0100, Martin Habets wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:46:04AM +1000, Loki Davison
wrote:
I was under the impression the "mdns" stuff was the same protocol?
-DR-
>As far as the /etc/services thing, I think
I'm going to drop that entry,
>join the 21st century and use ZeroConf (via Avahi) to solve this problem
>(which is exactly the problem zeroconf was meant to solve) - bonus
>points for working over a network as well, which /etc/services doesn't.
>
>If anyone has any serious objections to Lash depending on Avahi, speak
>now or forever hold your peace...
I'm all for the idea of joining the 21st century, but Avahi is a crap piece
of bloatware that only works properly on PC architectures.
avahi... zeroconf... sounds useful, maybe even
for something else,
like osc service discovery with liboscqs? :)
I've tried to add support for avahi to liboscqs, but found the API to
convoluted for the goal. Basically I'd have create yet another thread
for this, and that is too costly for my liking.
If I get a chance I'll implement the MDNS publish packet directly, that way
it should work with all implementations. It's just a UDP packet anyways.
To me the 21st century way of discovering services is via nss-mdns, but not
everyone has that yet.
6:29 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: Lashd won't start.
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 11:46 +1000, Loki Davison wrote:
On 9/4/06, Dave Robillard
<drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca> wrote:
so you spotted the greater direction this is a part of :)
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 11:51 +0300,
juuso.alasuutari(a)tamperelainen.org
wrote:
avahi... zeroconf... sounds useful, maybe even for something else,
like osc service discovery with liboscqs? :) Quoting Forest Bond
<forest(a)alittletooquiet.net>et>:
and
> Anyone seen this before? Happens when I try
to start lashd.
>
> brian@grace ~ $ lashd
> No supported SIMD instruction sets detected
> Connected to JACK server with client name 'LASH_Server'
> Opened ALSA sequencer with client ID 129
> conn_mgr_start: could not look up service name: Servname not supported
> for ai_socktype
> loader_run: server closed socket; exiting
> Segmentation fault
This is usually what happens if you are missing the appropriate line in
/etc/services (lashd shouldn't crash when this happens, but does.)
I'm the other one suffering from this bug, although I don't get that
conn_mgr_start message before the segfault. Also on my box lashd stays up quiet until I try to run any client.
I have this in /etc/services:
lash 14541/tcp # LASH client/server protocol
That should be about right, no?
Actually I think these are two different bugs.
As far as the /etc/services thing, I think I'm going to drop that entry,
join the 21st century and use ZeroConf (via Avahi) to solve this problem
(which is exactly the problem zeroconf was meant to solve) - bonus
points for working over a network as well, which /etc/services doesn't.
If anyone has any serious objections to Lash depending on Avahi, speak
now or forever hold your peace...
-DR- More on topic, no objections from me. All modern
systems come with it anyway.
that's what I figure. it's crucial for certain things (like lash and
anything OSC (which will include lash soon enough), and seems to be
installed on almost any remotely modern distro (or at least easily
installable), so I figure it's a win.
I'll do it regardless since it's so spiffy and show-offable and solves
everything so nicely, but hey - never hurts to ask :)
-DR-
6:23 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Lashd won't start.
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 13:47 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
As far as the /etc/services thing, I think I'm
going to drop that entry,
join the 21st century and use ZeroConf (via Avahi) to solve this problem
(which is exactly the problem zeroconf was meant to solve) - bonus
points for working over a network as well, which /etc/services doesn't.
If anyone has any serious objections to Lash depending on Avahi, speak
now or forever hold your peace...
Did you ever register the LASH service with IANA?
Lee
6:34 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Lashd won't start.
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 16:23 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 13:47 -0400, Dave Robillard
wrote:
Nope. TBH I don't particularly want to.
I plan on OSCifying LASH one of these days which would make it a
different (enough) service, and it's not (by a long shot) the only LAD
thing that needs this problem solved, and most of those don't have
registering with the IANA as an option (eg basically any app that uses
OSC whatsoever).
Might as well solve it right..
-DR-
As far as the /etc/services thing, I think
I'm going to drop that entry,
join the 21st century and use ZeroConf (via Avahi) to solve this problem
(which is exactly the problem zeroconf was meant to solve) - bonus
points for working over a network as well, which /etc/services doesn't.
If anyone has any serious objections to Lash depending on Avahi, speak
now or forever hold your peace...
Did you ever register the LASH service with IANA?
1:10 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Lashd won't start.
Forest Bond wrote:
You where right, Forest. Adding
lash 14541/tcp # LASH client/server protocol
to /etc/services got lashd running. I wasn't able to open lash_panel at
first, due to some message about not being able to find localhost. so
then i added a local host definition to
/etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
and now I have a working lash setup. Thanks!
something else is now quite troubling, though... it seems that all
multimedia applications are now incapable of seeing the SIMD features of
this PIII. lashd, lash_panel, zynaddsubfx, and even mplayer all say
No supported SIMD instruction sets detected
I'm running gentoo and i've got all the relevant use flags turned on,
sse, mmx...
any clues? how can this be broken system wide?
Anyone seen
this before? Happens when I try to start lashd.
brian@grace ~ $ lashd
No supported SIMD instruction sets detected
Connected to JACK server with client name 'LASH_Server'
Opened ALSA sequencer with client ID 129
conn_mgr_start: could not look up service name: Servname not supported
for ai_socktype
loader_run: server closed socket; exiting
Segmentation fault
This is usually what happens if you are missing the appropriate line in
/etc/services (lashd shouldn't crash when this happens, but does.)
-Forest
6:29 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Lashd won't start.
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 22:09 -0500, Brian Dunn wrote:
Forest Bond wrote:
You where right, Forest. Adding
lash 14541/tcp # LASH client/server protocol
to /etc/services got lashd running. I wasn't able to open lash_panel at
first, due to some message about not being able to find localhost. so
then i added a local host definition to
/etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
and now I have a working lash setup. Thanks!
something else is now quite troubling, though... it seems that all
multimedia applications are now incapable of seeing the SIMD features of
this PIII. lashd, lash_panel, zynaddsubfx, and even mplayer all say
No supported SIMD instruction sets detected
I'm running gentoo and i've got all the relevant use flags turned on,
sse, mmx...
any clues? how can this be broken system wide?
That message comes from jack.
-DR-
Anyone
seen this before? Happens when I try to start lashd.
brian@grace ~ $ lashd
No supported SIMD instruction sets detected
Connected to JACK server with client name 'LASH_Server'
Opened ALSA sequencer with client ID 129
conn_mgr_start: could not look up service name: Servname not supported
for ai_socktype
loader_run: server closed socket; exiting
Segmentation fault
This is usually what happens if you are missing the appropriate line in
/etc/services (lashd shouldn't crash when this happens, but does.)
-Forest
7 Sep
7 Sep
2:18 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Lashd won't start.
No supported
SIMD instruction sets detected
I'm running gentoo and i've got all the relevant use flags turned on,
sse, mmx...
any clues? how can this be broken system wide?
That message comes from jack.
-DR-
2 Sep
2 Sep
8:08 p.m.
On Sat, 02 Sep, 2006 at 11:44PM +0200, Ichthyostega spake thus:
Folderol schrieb:
Normal people are strange. Being strange is normal, really.
Which is strange.
So does that mean I'm less strange than I
thought I was, or that there
are more strange people? :)
I'll guess the latter.
Of course, there are "very normal" people out there,
and the other half you encounter is very strange....
;-) Ichthyostega
4 Sep
4 Sep
3:33 p.m.
On Saturday 02 September 2006 15:23, Folderol was like:
I was very interested in the replies here. It seems
there is quite a
lot of consensus.
So does that mean I'm less strange than I thought I was, or that there
are more strange people?
It's not unusual to be unusual anymore ...
--
cheers,
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk/tim
We are the people We've been waiting for.
8:14 p.m.
On Mon, 04 Sep, 2006 at 06:32PM +0100, tim hall spake thus:
On Saturday 02 September 2006 15:23, Folderol was
like:
Sung like Tom Jones?
I was very interested in the replies here. It
seems there is quite a
lot of consensus.
So does that mean I'm less strange than I thought I was, or that there
are more strange people?
It's not unusual to be unusual anymore ...
8:25 p.m.
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:17:05 +0100
james(a)dis-dot-dat.net wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep, 2006 at 06:32PM +0100, tim hall spake
thus:
Oh? Has he learnt to sing now? :D
--
Will J G
On Saturday 02 September 2006 15:23, Folderol was
like:
Sung like Tom Jones? I was very interested in the replies here. It
seems there is quite a
lot of consensus.
So does that mean I'm less strange than I thought I was, or that there
are more strange people?
It's not unusual to be unusual anymore ...
5 Sep
5 Sep
5:39 a.m.
On Monday 04 September 2006 23:17, james(a)dis-dot-dat.net was like:
On Mon, 04 Sep, 2006 at 06:32PM +0100, tim hall spake
thus:
Uh yeah. It's a quote from Captain Space Toad to be precise.
--
cheers,
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk/tim
We are the people We've been waiting for.
On Saturday 02 September 2006 15:23, Folderol was
like:
Sung like Tom Jones? I was very interested in the replies here. It
seems there is quite a
lot of consensus.
So does that mean I'm less strange than I thought I was, or that there
are more strange people?
It's not unusual to be unusual anymore ...
6452
days inactive
6460
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
28 comments
15 participants
participants (15)
-
Brian Dunn -
Chris McCormick -
Dave Robillard -
Drucer Ninetynine -
Folderol -
Forest Bond -
Ichthyostega -
james＠dis-dot-dat.net -
juuso.alasuutari＠tamperelainen.org -
Lee Revell -
Loki Davison -
Martin Habets -
Rob -
Thorsten Wilms -
tim hall