8 Jul
2004
8 Jul
'04
5 p.m.
It's the reason I keep a Mac around the house. Oh that and Pro Tools. When
is Ardour going to be interoperable with Pro Tools again?......
Matthew
----------
From: RickTaylor(a)speakeasy.net
Reply To: RickTaylor(a)speakeasy.net;A list for linux audio users
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2004 2:27 PM
To: A list for linux audio users
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
On 08-Jul-2004 Them wrote:
} Don't count on it happening. And you don't need it on Linux anyway.
}
} I think Rosegarden or NoteEdit are good contenders, and don't cost you
} $500.00. And Rosegarden works with JACK and LADSPA plugins, whereas
} Finale does not. And Finale can't do LilyPond. Finale's PostScript
} output option is a piece of junk, IMHO.
It is sort of universally recognized as the best. IEEHO
----------------------------------
E-Mail: RickTaylor(a)Speakeasy.Net
Date: 08-Jul-2004
Time: 13:24:09
This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------
****************************************************************************
This email may contain confidential material.
If you were not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender and delete all copies.
We may monitor email to and from our network.
****************************************************************************
8 Jul
8 Jul
5:26 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
:} I'm not sure you need to go that far. I do have a copy of Windows on
disk because I do need to run several win programs as well as use my win canopus
stuff. {Infrequently seeing as I've made a pretty concerted effort over the
past months to move stuff to the Main Audio codec. I still have backups in the
codec though.} Converting this all to something that will work with linux
software will be another huge mess. {I should probably move everything to tape
but that means recapturing and recutting and re-organizing 1000s of files.}
{I'm not looking forward to setting this mess up on another board. Or to the
problems I know are coming with 64 bit hardware.}
I've not even begun the process of moving audio stuff over. I think it's
probably easier just to start over and use the old rendered audio files. I'm
still trying to figure out what software is going to take over what functions.
I've done a disappointingly small amount of work over the past few months
seeing as I've had to pay so much attention to security and setting up a stable
system.
I really love using linux. I sort of wonder what sort of reason the average
windows or mac user has to make the switch. Especially given that many users
have *many* thousands of dollars invested in windows/mac software. {I know I
do.}
On 08-Jul-2004 Polashek, Matthew wrote:
} It's the reason I keep a Mac around the house. Oh that and Pro Tools. When
} is Ardour going to be interoperable with Pro Tools again?......
----------------------------------
E-Mail: RickTaylor(a)Speakeasy.Net
Date: 08-Jul-2004
Time: 13:54:49
This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------
6:37 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 02:15:11PM -0500, RickTaylor(a)speakeasy.net wrote:
I really love using linux. I sort of wonder what sort
of reason the average
windows or mac user has to make the switch. Especially given that many users
have *many* thousands of dollars invested in windows/mac software. {I know I
do.}
Never having to shell out hundreds or thousands of dollars more for upgrades.
-Eric Rz.
7:02 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
On 08-Jul-2004 Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
} On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 02:15:11PM -0500, RickTaylor(a)speakeasy.net wrote:
} > I really love using linux. I sort of wonder what sort of reason the
} > windows or mac user has to make the switch. Especially given that many
} > have *many* thousands of dollars invested in windows/mac software. {I know
}
} Never having to shell out hundreds or thousands of dollars more for
} upgrades.
To what software?
----------------------------------
E-Mail: RickTaylor(a)Speakeasy.Net
Date: 08-Jul-2004
Time: 15:50:38
This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------
7:26 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
Hello all,
there are better typesetting programs in the windows world
than finale; have a look at sibelius. And there is more code
in the linux world than rosegarden and noteedit. If you
are a developer and interested in score typesetting you
may have a look at http://mscore.sourceforge.net/
/werner
8:08 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
At 23.19 08/07/04, you wrote:
Hello all,
there are better typesetting programs in the windows world
than finale; have a look at sibelius. And there is more code
in the linux world than rosegarden and noteedit. If you
are a developer and interested in score typesetting you
may have a look at http://mscore.sourceforge.net/
/werner
Sorry werner, but I use Demudi (debian based) and when I try to compile lot of errors come
out...
Can you make a .deb of it?
ste
Stefano Cardo
Debian DeMuDi GNU/Linux User
9:37 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
el Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:19:35 +0200
Werner Schweer <ws(a)seh.de> escribió:
you may have a look at http://mscore.sourceforge.net/
hello werner,
i tried to build mscore after reading the requirements, which i thought i
met. but compilation failed reporting:
/bin/sh: pngtopnm: command not found
/bin/sh: pnmtops: command not found
not a big deal. i did build and install netpbm and compilation went a
little further, but only to stop again with:
make[2]: latex: No se encontró el programa [which means program not found]
so... i need tex too. now, that's about 80 Mb download and 300~400 Mb hard
disk space for installation, not to mention compilation time and work.
before investing that time, bandwidth, and disk space, i'd like to know if
this is part of the "requirements", or if, as usual, i'm completely missing
something.
best,
lj
--
9:53 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
At 01.29 09/07/04, you wrote:
el Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:19:35 +0200
Werner Schweer <ws(a)seh.de> escribió:
> you may have a look at http://mscore.sourceforge.net/
>
Hy lj, which distribution do you use?
if debian can you list me your file in /usr/share/qt3/lib ?
Thanks so much!!
ste
--
Stefano Cardo
Debian DeMuDi GNU/Linux User
10:09 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
el Fri, 09 Jul 2004 01:41:08 +0200
stefano cardo <stefano.cardo(a)fastwebnet.it> escribió:
if debian can you list me your file in
/usr/share/qt3/lib ?
ciao stefano,
sorry, i'm using Linux From Scratch... i installed qt (version 3.3.1) in
/opt
if it's of any use for you, which i doubt, i have the following under
/opt/qt-3.3.1/lib :
libdesignercore.a
libdesignercore.prl
libeditor.a
libeditor.prl
libqassistantclient.a
libqassistantclient.prl
libqt-mt.la
libqt-mt.prl
libqt-mt.so
libqt-mt.so.3
libqt-mt.so.3.3
libqt-mt.so.3.3.1
libqt.so
libqui.prl
libqui.so
libqui.so.1
libqui.so.1.0
libqui.so.1.0.0
pkgconfig
best,
lj
--
9 Jul
9 Jul
6:05 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
On Friday 09 July 2004 01:29, luis jure wrote:
el Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:19:35 +0200
Werner Schweer <ws(a)seh.de> escribió:
pngtopnm, latex etc. will be used to build the user manual. As there is
yet no usable manual, i believe you can simply ignore the error messages.
/werner
you may have a look at
http://mscore.sourceforge.net/
hello werner,
i tried to build mscore after reading the requirements, which i thought i
met. but compilation failed reporting:
/bin/sh: pngtopnm: command not found
/bin/sh: pnmtops: command not found
not a big deal. i did build and install netpbm and compilation went a
little further, but only to stop again with:
make[2]: latex: No se encontró el programa [which means program not found]
so... i need tex too. now, that's about 80 Mb download and 300~400 Mb hard
disk space for installation, not to mention compilation time and work.
before investing that time, bandwidth, and disk space, i'd like to know if
this is part of the "requirements", or if, as usual, i'm completely
missing
something. 
8 Jul
8 Jul
5:41 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
Polashek, Matthew wrote:
It's the reason I keep a Mac around the house. Oh
that and Pro Tools. When
is Ardour going to be interoperable with Pro Tools again?......
Matthew
Again? I wasn't aware that it ever was. Ardour has never understood any
of my session files. Audio files have been moderately compatible. I
expect that they are better now. MIDI was unsupported. There's no direct
mapping for plugins.
7489
days inactive
7490
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
10 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki -
luis jure -
Mark Knecht -
Polashek, Matthew -
RickTaylor＠Speakeasy.Net -
stefano cardo -
Werner Schweer