Atte,
When I was facing a similar decision a few months ago, my local music
store didn't have an Edirol UM-2 (which may fit your bill), and I decided
not to get an M-Audio device because I was worried about USB standard
compliance as well as proprietary firmware. Instead, I went ahead and
got an Edirol PCR-30. That one's actually a 32-key MIDI keyboard with
a bunch of programmable buttons and dials and sliders, and it just
happends to have a USB port as well. Everything worked right out of
the box, and in hindsight I'm glad to have gotten the PCR-30 instead
of the UM-2 because I really like having an extra keyboard as well
as a bunch of additional controllers.
Just my $0.02,
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Atte André Jensen"
<atte(a)ballbreaker.dk>
To: <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu>
Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2004 12:11 PM
Subject: [linux-audio-user] usb midi interface: USB Midisport Uno vs.
USBMidisport Uno
Hi
I need a basic midi interface, and I'm thinking about either the M-Audio
USB Midisport Uno or the Audiotrak USB Midisport Uno. Which one should I
choose (and why) for use with my debian/unstable/2.6.9 system? I would
prefer an interface the works as out of the box as possible...
Also are there any major disadvantages with usb interfaces, and what else
would be an option in the same price range?
Thanks in advance for any feedback!
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk