31 Jul
2012
31 Jul
'12
10:54 p.m.
Hi folks,
If you haven't seen it yet, someone started creating a whole new audio
system for Linux and BSD.
http://klang.eudyptula.org/
P.S. Yep, a system, not just a server. Just as we got ALSA, PA and
JACK working together nicely.... :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
31 Jul
31 Jul
11:02 p.m.
2012/7/31 Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoudine(a)gmail.com>
Hi folks,
If you haven't seen it yet, someone started creating a whole new audio
system for Linux and BSD.
http://klang.eudyptula.org/
P.S. Yep, a system, not just a server. Just as we got ALSA, PA and
JACK working together nicely.... :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
sigh ... yet another system ...
just what we needed ;-P
thijs
11:02 p.m.
I carefully read what this guy wrote. It does sound like a reasonable
attempt.
L.V.
11:06 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
I carefully read what this guy wrote. It does sound
like a reasonable
attempt.
ahem. http://ardour.org/pd_on_klang
it is NOT a reasonable attempt. its an effort by someone who doesn't really
understand much about audio, and from some of the available video evidence,
doesn't understand a lot about linux either, to reinvent what doesn't need
reinventing and to avoid doing the actual hard work that would genuinely
improve things.
11:18 p.m.
Curious discussion. If you do continue it on a forum, do let me/us know.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com>wrote;wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
I carefully read what this guy wrote. It does
sound like a reasonable
attempt.
ahem. http://ardour.org/pd_on_klang
it is NOT a reasonable attempt. its an effort by someone who doesn't
really understand much about audio, and from some of the available video
evidence, doesn't understand a lot about linux either, to reinvent what
doesn't need reinventing and to avoid doing the actual hard work that would
genuinely improve things.
11:32 p.m.
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:06:17 -0400
Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Louigi Verona
<louigi.verona(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
I was instantly put off by the hype. Dreaded Xruns indeed! I actually had one
this evening - it was quite a novel experience.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
I carefully read what this guy wrote. It does
sound like a reasonable
attempt.
ahem. http://ardour.org/pd_on_klang
it is NOT a reasonable attempt. its an effort by someone who doesn't really
understand much about audio, and from some of the available video evidence,
doesn't understand a lot about linux either, to reinvent what doesn't need
reinventing and to avoid doing the actual hard work that would genuinely
improve things. 
1 Aug
1 Aug
9:50 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:06:17PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
it is NOT a reasonable attempt. its an effort by
someone who doesn't really
understand much about audio, and from some of the available video evidence,
doesn't understand a lot about linux either, to reinvent what doesn't need
reinventing and to avoid doing the actual hard work that would genuinely
improve things.
Yep, it looks like a big waste of time and effort.
There *is* a grain of truth in the argument pro fixed point,
but it matters only in extreme cases and I really wonder if
the Klang author really understands anything of this.
If you compute a very long FIR filter in the 'obvious'
way using 32-bit floating point:
s = 0;
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) s += c [i] * x [i];
out = s;
with N = 100000 or so, you will be adding a nontrivial
amount of noise. The solution is to split up the sum,
first make sums of say 1000 samples then add these:
s1 = s2 = 0;
for (i = j = 0; i < N; i++, j++)
{
if (j == 1000)
{
s2 += s1;
s1 = 0;
j = 0;
}
s1 += c [i] * x [i];
}
out = s1 + s2;
The extreme case of this happens within the FFT: each of the
N outputs is a sum of N terms, but they are added in binary
tree fashion, first sums of two, then sums of four, etc.
It's the reason why computing a long FIR using an FFT-based
convolution engine is not only much more efficient, but also
more accurate than the direct form.
BTW, how long it is since TI introduced their first 40-bit
floating point DSP chip (the C30) ? 20 years or so ...
Ciao,
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
2 Aug
2 Aug
4:53 a.m.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)linuxaudio.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:06:17PM -0400, Paul Davis
wrote:
Any pointers to why floating point in the kernel is such a no-no?
I could understand it when floating point happened in co-processors.
it is NOT a reasonable attempt. its an effort by
someone who doesn't
really
understand much about audio, and from some of the
available video
evidence,
doesn't understand a lot about linux either,
to reinvent what doesn't
need
reinventing and to avoid doing the actual hard
work that would genuinely
improve things.
Yep, it looks like a big waste of time and effort.
There *is* a grain of truth in the argument pro fixed point,
5:18 a.m.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Rustom Mody <rustompmody(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Any pointers to why floating point in the kernel is
such a no-no?
I could understand it when floating point happened in co-processors.
FPU register state is expensive to save+restore. no point in doing it all
the time when you hardly ever need to.
1 Aug
1 Aug
6:55 a.m.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 01:02:56AM +0400, Louigi Verona wrote:
I carefully read what this guy wrote. It does sound
like a reasonable
attempt.
klang's author doesn't know JACK!
!! JACK has the right design, but consumes just to much CPU
!! and kills power efficiency. Also it doesn't cope well with
!! coarse scheduling.
JACK *is* efficient, consumes scarcely a couple percent CPU
on my system.
Not sure what the last sentence means.
--
Joel Roth
2:01 p.m.
Well, at least you guys saw the reaction of a non-coder :)
If you say that what he says is nonsense - I got the message.
However, he did reply to Paul on his blog post. Maybe he does have
some mistakes, but I would be interested to read the conversation,
if it will carry on, perhaps to understand things better myself.
L.V.
2:09 p.m.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Well, at least you guys saw the reaction of a
non-coder :)
If you say that what he says is nonsense - I got the message.
However, he did reply to Paul on his blog post. Maybe he does have
some mistakes, but I would be interested to read the conversation,
if it will carry on, perhaps to understand things better myself.
it is continuing on the phoronix thread.
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?72625-KLANG-A-New-Linux-Audio-Sys…
2:34 p.m.
Thanks. Following, although I must say the author of KLANG does not seem to
react to your arguments. Maybe not yet.
2 Aug
2 Aug
10:38 a.m.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks. Following, although I must say the author of
KLANG does not seem to
react to your arguments. Maybe not yet.
I find it disturbing in the extreme to read comments such as "I guess
you embarrassed datenwolf to the point he will not respond. That's the
end of KLANG then!"
Seriously? Does everything on the Internet need to be a pissing contest?
10:59 a.m.
I did not say that, those are your words. I am interested in the discussion.
Paul has put forward some serious argument. I wonder if the guy will
respond to them, that's all.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Louigi Verona
<louigi.verona(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
Thanks. Following, although I must say the author
of KLANG does not seem
to
react to your arguments. Maybe not yet.
I find it disturbing in the extreme to read comments such as "I guess
you embarrassed datenwolf to the point he will not respond. That's the
end of KLANG then!"
Seriously? Does everything on the Internet need to be a pissing contest?
11:04 a.m.
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:14:55 +0400
Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I did not say that, those are your words. I am
interested in the discussion.
Paul has put forward some serious argument. I wonder if the guy will
respond to them, that's all.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks. Following, although I must say the author of KLANG does not seem
> to
> > react to your arguments. Maybe not yet.
> >
> I find it disturbing in the extreme to read comments such as "I guess
> you embarrassed datenwolf to the point he will not respond. That's the
> end of KLANG then!"
>
> Seriously? Does everything on the Internet need to be a pissing contest?
>
It is a problem of style and pride. AFAIK not even once Datenwolf responsed in the line
with "yes, I have not thought about this yet. Let me think how I can address this
problem" but instead he acts like he has everything figured out and knows all
problems and solutions. That is no discussion, it is a poor defense.
For me thats a(nother) hint that he does indeed not know much and is pretentious.
11:23 a.m.
I have no idea who that poster is, obviously. Just seems such a
fanboy-ish thing to do, adds nothing to the discussion except more
rancour.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I did not say that, those are your words. I am
interested in the discussion.
Paul has put forward some serious argument. I wonder if the guy will
respond to them, that's all.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/ Thanks. Following, although I must say the author
of KLANG does not seem
to
react to your arguments. Maybe not yet.
I find it disturbing in the extreme to read comments such as "I guess
you embarrassed datenwolf to the point he will not respond. That's the
end of KLANG then!"
Seriously? Does everything on the Internet need to be a pissing contest? 
11:16 a.m.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Louigi Verona
<louigi.verona(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't think this is about the Internet so much, and nor is it a
pissing match. The guy basically came out and said *everything* in
linux audio is broken, and the only way to fix it is to start
everything from scratch. With everything in life, if you take an
extreme position you should expect extreme responses, and also be
prepared to back up your claims.
Thanks. Following, although I must say the author
of KLANG does not seem to
react to your arguments. Maybe not yet.
I find it disturbing in the extreme to read comments such as "I guess
you embarrassed datenwolf to the point he will not respond. That's the
end of KLANG then!"
Seriously? Does everything on the Internet need to be a pissing contest? 
1:12 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I find it disturbing in the extreme to read comments such as "I guess
you embarrassed datenwolf to the point he will not respond. That's the
end of KLANG then!"
Seriously? Does everything on the Internet need to be a pissing contest?
Since it isn't obvious at all where this quote came from, to clarify for
folks, this quote was in reference to the Phoronix thread, where someone
apparently joined the Phoronix forum to say that. Yes it is in poor taste,
though you need to clarify when pulling quotes out of other threads.
Seablade
3:19 p.m.
On Thu, August 2, 2012 1:11 pm, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Oon-Ee Ng
<ngoonee.talk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I find it disturbing in the extreme to read comments such as "I guess
> you embarrassed datenwolf to the point he will not respond. That's the
> end of KLANG then!"
>
> Seriously? Does everything on the Internet need to be a pissing contest?
>
Is the question from Oon-Ee regarding the thread, discussion or just this
one comment?
Since it isn't obvious at all where this quote came from, to clarify for
folks, this quote was in reference to the Phoronix thread, where someone
apparently joined the Phoronix forum to say that. Yes it is in poor
taste,
though you need to clarify when pulling quotes out of other threads.
IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing on this one. After all
the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of
the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
Reeks of m$ and Avid propaganda. A see through attempt at trying to
destabilise the system and spread FUD by implying that it needs to be
fixed when the complete opposite is true. Linux Audio is actually the
lowest latency audio system on the planet and is only getting better every
day.
A desperate attempt by a dying company to hold on to their fragile market
position. Now that they don't have any value in their company left to
allow them to monopolise the mainstream media due to investors abandoning
them, the general state of the global economy and being $1billion in the
hole already (try paying of the interest on $1billion every month when you
are not even breaking even to start with) they are attempting to play the
m$ game plan.
They are feeling the heat now....
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
3:34 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Patrick Shirkey
<pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com>wrote;wrote:
Reeks of m$ and Avid propaganda. A see through attempt at trying to
datenwolf is a diehard linux fan. in fact, he's a diehard unix fan. many of
his objections to things that have been done with the desktop and to some
extent with audio come from his very strong conviction that its not unix-ey
enough. his feelings on this stuff are actually not that different from
some people on this list. if you watch the video of him raging against the
gnome desktop, you'll get a much better sense of where he's coming from,
and its not washington state or california.
3:47 p.m.
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:34:38 -0400
Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
datenwolf is a diehard linux fan. in fact, he's a
diehard unix fan. many of
his objections to things that have been done with the desktop and to some
extent with audio come from his very strong conviction that its not unix-ey
enough. his feelings on this stuff are actually not that different from
some people on this list. if you watch the video of him raging against the
gnome desktop, you'll get a much better sense of where he's coming from,
and its not washington state or california.
He's got points there - Gnome's been problematic for a while. But unlike
other mainstream OSes, I have a lot of options as to my window/desktop
manager, and it doesn't seem useful to build up that much rage about it.
It seems like he would get along with Theo DeRaadt, who is also capable of
whipping himself into a frenzy. (Theo's latest rant over the Win8/UEFI
secure boot is a great example. He slammed RedHat and Canonical for
trying to figure out a working compromise, and even compared RH to MS.
Um, no.)
I think the klang project is a dead end, and it's too bad that all
that really comes out if it is more bitching about linux audio, which
is finally at a pretty good level for both the casual and power users
now.
--
======================================================================
Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh(a)brainiac.com
Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
3:36 p.m.
Regarding
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?72625-KLANG-A-New-Linux-Audio-Sys…
On 08/02/2012 03:19 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
[..]
A desperate attempt by a dying company to hold on to
their fragile market
position.
nope.
Some background about the author of KLANG:
http://events.ccc.de/congress/2010/Fahrplan/speakers/2477.en.html
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=datenwolf
4:19 p.m.
On 08/02/12 15:36, Robin Gareus wrote:
Regarding
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?72625-KLANG-A-New-Linux-Audio-Sys…
On 08/02/2012 03:19 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
[..]
I can recommend the 27c3 lecture Youtube video. This will make clear
once and for all that datenwolf is in no way affiliated with any big
company.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTdUmlGxVo0
Jeremy
A desperate attempt by a dying company to hold on
to their fragile market
position.
nope.
Some background about the author of KLANG:
http://events.ccc.de/congress/2010/Fahrplan/speakers/2477.en.html
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=datenwolf
3:38 p.m.
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
"Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com> wrote:
IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing on
this one. After all
the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of
the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power management.
My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it
have a heat problem. I really couldn't care less about whether my audio
subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and I
don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK. My studio system
has been very stable for years now.
Not only is he solving a non-problem, but he's trying to do it without
tapping the knowledge base of the people who have been working on this
for years, and he's trying to do it in a way that is counter to decisions
made at high levels in the kernel dev circles about using FP in the
kernel.
--
======================================================================
Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh(a)brainiac.com
Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
3:51 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Joe Hartley <jh(a)brainiac.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
"Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com> wrote:
AFAIK, if you have your cpu governor set to 'performance', you
shouldn't have an issue with frequency scaling anyway. I have so much
stuff consuming power in my studio as it is, I doubt Jack is going to
make that much of an impact on it. :-)
--
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it,
it would overturn the world."
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing
on this one. After all
the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of
the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power management.
My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it
have a heat problem. I really couldn't care less about whether my audio
subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and I
don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK. My studio system
has been very stable for years now.
7:33 p.m.
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:51:11 -0400
Brett McCoy <idragosani(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Joe Hartley
<jh(a)brainiac.com> wrote:
What I find extremely disappointing about all of this is that we are not
exactly over-endowed with developers. Without casting stones in any directions
this entire issue is a waste of talent and potential advancement.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
"Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com> wrote:
AFAIK, if you have your cpu governor set to 'performance', you
shouldn't have an issue with frequency scaling anyway. I have so much
stuff consuming power in my studio as it is, I doubt Jack is going to
make that much of an impact on it. :-) IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing
on this one. After all
the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of
the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power management.
My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it
have a heat problem. I really couldn't care less about whether my audio
subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and I
don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK. My studio system
has been very stable for years now.
7:36 p.m.
ha!
indeed. i wish now that lv2 is better established for people to make
more synths and effect plugins. i wish i could have a choice of those
and not just 1 or 2 dssi.
On 8/2/12, Folderol <folderol(a)ukfsn.org> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:51:11 -0400
Brett McCoy <idragosani(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Joe Hartley
<jh(a)brainiac.com> wrote:
What I find extremely disappointing about all of this is that we are not
exactly over-endowed with developers. Without casting stones in any
directions
this entire issue is a waste of talent and potential advancement.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
"Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com> wrote:
AFAIK, if you have your cpu governor set to 'performance', you
shouldn't have an issue with frequency scaling anyway. I have so much
stuff consuming power in my studio as it is, I doubt Jack is going to
make that much of an impact on it. :-) IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing
on this one. After
all
the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio
platform
over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out
of
the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having
the
courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power
management.
My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it
have a heat problem. I really couldn't care less about whether my
audio
subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and
I
don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK. My studio
system
has been very stable for years now. 
5 Aug
5 Aug
1:07 p.m.
New subject: OT: klang
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 09:51 -0400, Brett McCoy wrote:
AFAIK, if you have your cpu governor set to
'performance', you
shouldn't have an issue with frequency scaling anyway. I have so much
stuff consuming power in my studio as it is, I doubt Jack is going to
make that much of an impact on it. :-)
I guess the governor needs to be set up to a fixed frequency.
Performance or any lower fixed frequency. FWIW measurements with an
elCheapo tool resulted in nearly no difference for my dual-core 2.1GHz
set to performance and ondemand.
Regards,
Ralf
2 Aug
2 Aug
9:25 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:38:35AM -0400, Joe Hartley wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
"Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com> wrote:
I'll jump in on this power-consumption silliness, just because I'm
procrastinating.
Almost exactly 3 years ago I did a 3-hour gig on an EEE using battery power.
Unintentionally-- I thought I'd plugged in my netbook but I hadn't, and didn't
discover it had been unplugged until I was packing up after the gig.
No problem, and I still had tons of battery left.
I was running an Ingo RT kernel, jackd, linuxsampler with a huge piano sample library,
bunch of LADSPA plugins, fluidsynth, and probably some other stuff as well.
It was a duo gig-- me and a drummer-- and if anything had messed up I'd certainly have
known it. Nothing did.
Yeah, anecdotes are not data, but still, neither is what this klang guy is on about.
-ken
IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing
on this one. After all
the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of
the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power management.
My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it
have a heat problem. I really couldn't care less about whether my audio
subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and I
don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK. My studio system
has been very stable for years now.
Not only is he solving a non-problem, but he's trying to do it without
tapping the knowledge base of the people who have been working on this
for years, and he's trying to do it in a way that is counter to decisions
made at high levels in the kernel dev circles about using FP in the
kernel.
4:28 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Patrick Shirkey
<pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com>wrote;wrote:
IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing on this one. After all
the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of
the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
You misunderstood my comment. I have absolutely no issue with how Paul
responded, and he and I talked about it a little on #ardour even but
honestly I agree with him in pretty much every regard and trust that he
knows more about it and can comment on it far more throughly than I ever
could.
My issue, was with the exact comment that was quoted by Oon-Ee, which was
little more than trolling, and Oon-Ee was correct in his assesment in my
opinion. However I just wanted to clarify where the comment Oon-Ee qutoed
came from, which was from the Phoronix thread, not from any mailing list
thread so it was obviously confusing what was trying to be said as some
people thought it was directed to them when it wasn't.
The rest of your post has been pretty well addressed by others I believe so
I will leave that alone:)
Seablade
4487
days inactive
4492
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
30 comments
19 participants
participants (19)
-
Alexandre Prokoudine -
Brett McCoy -
Folderol -
Fons Adriaensen -
Jeremy Jongepier -
Joe Hartley -
Joel Roth -
Ken Restivo -
Louigi Verona -
michael noble -
Nils -
Oon-Ee Ng -
Patrick Shirkey -
Paul Davis -
Ralf Mardorf -
Robin Gareus -
Rustom Mody -
Thijs van severen -
Thomas Vecchione