27 Oct
2008
27 Oct
'08
5:30 a.m.
Hi,
I anyone is feeling creative and wants to take a stab at making a new
animated gif logo for the quicktoots it would be very helpful.
The old one is getting tired and I don't have any ideas for a new one
right now.
Cheers.
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.
30 Oct
30 Oct
5:53 a.m.
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Hi,
I anyone is feeling creative and wants to take a stab at making a new
animated gif logo for the quicktoots it would be very helpful.
The old one is getting tired and I don't have any ideas for a new one
right now.
One kind person has taken some time to make a logo. This may give
someone else some ideas. I like the direction but I think it could be
taken further.
http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
Cheers.
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.
11:06 p.m.
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
I have received a new set of logos with a different angle from the
previous one which is very apt. I have put them online for discussion
and maybe they will inspire someone else to have a go too.
http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
*Ideally I would like to have an animated logo that fits into the header space so please
keep it in mind while designing. Of course if you don't feel up to doing the
animation but still have a good idea for the static image that is not a problem as we can
always animate it later.
Cheers.
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.
Hi,
I anyone is feeling creative and wants to take a stab at making a new
animated gif logo for the quicktoots it would be very helpful.
The old one is getting tired and I don't have any ideas for a new one
right now.
One kind person has taken some time to make a logo. This may give
someone else some ideas. I like the direction but I think it could be
taken further.
http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
Cheers.
31 Oct
31 Oct
5:16 a.m.
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
The new one is much better IMHO. Maybe the teacher should have some
music notes and linux commands on his white board?
To be honest. Those animated logo's don't do any good. Very irritating
and disturbing, not a good idea IMHO
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
I have received a new set of logos with a different angle from the
previous one which is very apt. I have put them online for discussion
and maybe they will inspire someone else to have a go too.
http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
*Ideally I would like to have an animated logo that fits into the header space so please
keep it in mind while designing. Of course if you don't feel up to doing the
animation but still have a good idea for the static image that is not a problem as we can
always animate it later.
Hi,
I anyone is feeling creative and wants to take a stab at making a new
animated gif logo for the quicktoots it would be very helpful.
The old one is getting tired and I don't have any ideas for a new one
right now.
One kind person has taken some time to make a logo. This may give
someone else some ideas. I like the direction but I think it could be
taken further.
http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
Cheers.
5:27 a.m.
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
This can be arranged.
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
The new one is much better IMHO. Maybe the teacher should have some
music notes and linux commands on his white board?
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
I have received a new set of logos with a different angle from the
previous one which is very apt. I have put them online for discussion
and maybe they will inspire someone else to have a go too.
http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
*Ideally I would like to have an animated logo that fits into the header space so please
keep it in mind while designing. Of course if you don't feel up to doing the
animation but still have a good idea for the static image that is not a problem as we can
always animate it later.
Hi,
I anyone is feeling creative and wants to take a stab at making a new
animated gif logo for the quicktoots it would be very helpful.
The old one is getting tired and I don't have any ideas for a new one
right now.
One kind person has taken some time to make a logo. This may give
someone else some ideas. I like the direction but I think it could be
taken further.
http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
Cheers.
To be honest. Those animated logo's don't do
any good. Very irritating
and disturbing, not a good idea IMHO
I appreciate your sentiment but the final version is definitely gonna be
animated.
Cheers.
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.
7:04 a.m.
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
That would be a bad thing IMHO.
To be honest, the frontpage of the quicktoots almoste even bad ad the
most brutal advertisement website with all those thing flashing in your
face (...exaggeration...) .
Ok, your content is far from 'brutal' ;), but it is the same when its
comes to irritating flash/ animated/ moving things. Anyone specialist
would say this is a bad thing to do on a website, unless you want to
earn quick money and put some animated nude woman in your website... :/
I like the idea of the website! :) , but when it comes to the logo, I
only see disadvantages of (to much) animated stuff there.
Regards,
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
This can be arranged.
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
The new one is much better IMHO. Maybe the teacher should have some
music notes and linux commands on his white board?
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I anyone is feeling creative and wants to take a stab at making a
> new animated gif logo for the quicktoots it would be very helpful.
>
> The old one is getting tired and I don't have any ideas for a new
> one right now.
>
>
>
One kind person has taken some time to make a logo. This may give
someone else some ideas. I like the direction but I think it could
be taken further.
http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
Cheers.
I have received a new set of logos with a different angle from the
previous one which is very apt. I have put them online for
discussion and maybe they will inspire someone else to have a go too.
http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
*Ideally I would like to have an animated logo that fits into the
header space so please keep it in mind while designing. Of course
if you don't feel up to doing the animation but still have a good
idea for the static image that is not a problem as we can always
animate it later.
To be honest. Those animated logo's don't
do any good. Very
irritating and disturbing, not a good idea IMHO
I appreciate your sentiment but the final version is definitely gonna
be animated.
8:59 a.m.
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:27 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
1997 called, and said they wanted their dreadful design ideas back.
I wouldn't consider contributing anything to the site with that bloody
awful thing flashing away like that. It's just about the worst bit of
design I've seen.
Gordon
To be honest.
Those animated logo's don't do any good. Very irritating
and disturbing, not a good idea IMHO
I appreciate your sentiment but the final version is definitely gonna be
animated. 
9:25 a.m.
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 11:03 +0000, Gordon J. C. Pearce MM3YEQ wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:27 +0700, Patrick Shirkey
wrote:
1997 called, and said they wanted their dreadful design ideas back.
I wouldn't consider contributing anything to the site with that bloody
awful thing flashing away like that. It's just about the worst bit of
design I've seen.
Gordon
Same here. I have a hard time to take someone who suggests an animated
logo for such a site seriously at all. In fact, I don't.
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
To be
honest. Those animated logo's don't do any good. Very irritating
and disturbing, not a good idea IMHO
I appreciate your sentiment but the final version is definitely gonna be
animated.
2 Nov
2 Nov
9:50 p.m.
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 11:03 +0000, Gordon J. C. Pearce
MM3YEQ wrote:
Well, the quicktoots site is not about being serious. It's about giving
people who are not serious users an idea about the possibilities
available to them. It's meant to be the complete antithesis of "Linux"
greater than thou, high brow, wankerism and if you really want to get
into it is aimed directly at "young" windows users who might be
interested in learning about Linux Audio. Now if I was aiming it as mac
users then I would not even go near an animated logo.
An animated logo is simply another way to display movement, action and
the concept of multimedia. If you look at the rest of the content there
it is trying to provide a lot of visual context and we even have a
couple of videos now.
I would expect that the majority of people round here wouldn't even need
to read a quicktoot most of us are more than capable of figuring out how
to do things on our own.
But feel free to hate. It seems to be a bit of a theme these days anyway...
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:27 +0700, Patrick
Shirkey wrote:
1997 called, and said they wanted their dreadful design ideas back.
I wouldn't consider contributing anything to the site with that bloody
awful thing flashing away like that. It's just about the worst bit of
design I've seen.
Gordon
Same here. I have a hard time to take someone who suggests an animated
logo for such a site seriously at all. In fact, I don't.
To be
honest. Those animated logo's don't do any good. Very irritating
and disturbing, not a good idea IMHO
I appreciate your sentiment but the final version is definitely gonna be
animated.
3 Nov
3 Nov
1:08 p.m.
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
Some messages where a bit negative, others just gave you some arguments...
Attractive is ok, but all those animated ads on top of the live.com
page, doesn't say Windows users love animated logo's...
Attractive is ok, but as said before, this is not attractive but it make
you want to leave that page...
Maybe be colourful, nice looking, great color combining etc. is what
we're looking for....
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 11:03 +0000, Gordon J. C.
Pearce MM3YEQ wrote:
Well, the quicktoots site is not about being serious. It's about giving
people who are not serious users an idea about the possibilities
available to them. It's meant to be the complete antithesis of "Linux"
greater than thou, high brow, wankerism and if you really want to get
into it is aimed directly at "young" windows users who might be
interested in learning about Linux Audio. Now if I was aiming it as mac
users then I would not even go near an animated logo.
An animated logo is simply another way to display movement, action and
the concept of multimedia. If you look at the rest of the content there
it is trying to provide a lot of visual context and we even have a
couple of videos now.
I would expect that the majority of people round here wouldn't even need
to read a quicktoot most of us are more than capable of figuring out how
to do things on our own.
But feel free to hate. It seems to be a bit of a theme these days anyway...
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 16:27 +0700, Patrick
Shirkey wrote:
Same here. I have a hard time to take someone who suggests an animated
logo for such a site seriously at all. In fact, I don't.
> To be honest. Those animated logo's
don't do any good. Very irritating
> and disturbing, not a good idea IMHO
>
>
>
>
I appreciate your sentiment but the final version is definitely gonna be
animated.
1997 called, and said they wanted their dreadful design ideas back.
I wouldn't consider contributing anything to the site with that bloody
awful thing flashing away like that. It's just about the worst bit of
design I've seen.
Gordon
1:32 p.m.
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Attractive is ok, but all those animated ads on top of
the live.com
page, doesn't say Windows users love animated logo's...
Attractive is ok, but as said before, this is not attractive but it make
you want to leave that page...
Maybe be colourful, nice looking, great color combining etc. is what
we're looking for....
As somebody who's looked into web usability and such studies - visitors
almost always automatically consider animated images ads, and ignore them.
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
11:02 p.m.
david wrote:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Absolutely. I would love to have the design chops to do such magic.
Maybe be colourful, nice looking, great color
combining etc. is what
we're looking for....
As somebody who's looked into web usability and
such studies - visitors
almost always automatically consider animated images ads, and ignore them.
Ahhh Grasshopper. Ignore them they may try. Exposure to same thing
<pause> over and over again <pause/> has well known impact <pause/> on
<quicker>subconscious mind</quicker>...
:-)
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.
31 Oct
31 Oct
12:33 p.m.
Am Fri, 31. Oct 2008 um 10:08:23 +0100 schrieb Grammostola Rosea:
To be honest. Those animated logo's don't do
any good. Very irritating
and disturbing, not a good idea IMHO
That is my impression too.
Guido
--
http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/
http://www.lug-burghausen.org/
5659
days inactive
5666
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
12 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
david -
Gordon J. C. Pearce MM3YEQ -
Grammostola Rosea -
Guido Scholz -
Patrick Shirkey -
Thorsten Wilms