17 Nov
2006
17 Nov
'06
3:45 a.m.
Fons Adriaensen:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 05:27:54PM -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Sure, many vst plugins either don't have a gui, or are based on toolsets
that are available for linux as well, such as juce, vstgui and fltk.
(I've been reading the vst development list for some years)
I think its a shame that a non-free program was necessary to make
some VST makers recompile their VSTs for linux though...
I think one good thing that is coming out of this
is that the creator has
apparently convinced some VST makers to recompile their VSTs for Linux as
well. So, not all that is commercial is necessarily evil...
What does that mean, a VST compiled for Linux ? Will it work without
a Windoze emulator ?
17 Nov
17 Nov
9:22 a.m.
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 08:44 +0100, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Fons Adriaensen:
vstgui is not really available for linux at this time. theoretically
there is a motif backend, but it seems that hardly anyone uses it or
even attempts to make sure that it works with the latest changes to
vstgui.
i think that the number of vst plugins using JUCE or FLTK can be counted
on the fingers of one person's hands.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 05:27:54PM -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Sure, many vst plugins either don't have a gui, or are based on toolsets
that are available for linux as well, such as juce, vstgui and fltk.
(I've been reading the vst development list for some years) I think one good thing that is coming out of this
is that the creator has
apparently convinced some VST makers to recompile their VSTs for Linux as
well. So, not all that is commercial is necessarily evil...
What does that mean, a VST compiled for Linux ? Will it work without
a Windoze emulator ?
6583
days inactive
6583
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Kjetil S. Matheussen -
Paul Davis