Yeah, I like this one too, I think it is very cosmic. And it is made algorithmically, unlike most earlier tracks, because by that time I wrote a tool for that in Pure Data.

As for range of frequencies, I guess it is a time when I began exploring less minimal forms of droning. But what I like about earlier tracks is that they are so uncompromising. Simple, ultra-minimalistic and very static. I do insert such static works from time to time today as well.

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:28 PM, david wrote: I'm listening to 055 right now and really like it. Has a wider range of frequencies than many of the earlier tracks, for one thing. Also, it sounds more like a composition someone made (vs some algorithmic machine running a program). Nice sounds to work by! On 11/30/2012 09:19 AM, Louigi Verona wrote: I am always curious to know which ones people favor the most. I am happy to report that tastes differ so much that I know people who like even the most bizarre tunes, which I thought nobody would enjoy. For instance, I am very happy one of the listeners liked 136. It is a very special tune for me, I think it creates a very thoughtful and even sad feeling and keeps you in it, but I can imagine not many people would find themselves on the same tone with me here. On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:06 PM, david wrote: On 11/30/2012 12:08 AM, wes schreiner wrote: I've listened to all 192, some multiple times. Of the recent batch I like droning191. Of the older pieces I like droning041 the most. More dark sounds with heavy rumble bass, please! And I like 152 and 153 the most so far, but there were some before 013 that I liked, too.