22 May
2017
22 May
'17
12:42 p.m.
The subject is a reference to Paul Davies talk at LAC2017
(https://youtu.be/tZbMfyBGPKo?list=PLpEMKw8jHgdRA3ydjZvt73q4Nc4W0jvuz&t=…)
I happened to come across a user interface for a DAW recently in a
Swedish magazine for home studio (online). The program is called Amped
Studio and is a cloud-based version of an DAW. Seems to be a sensible
user interface, maybe a bit simple for an DAW. But it could be how a
"The Future" might look like.
https://www.ampedstudio.com/
launch the app.
https://app.ampedstudio.com/
best,
--
/bengan
22 May
22 May
1:19 p.m.
Yes, this is pretty much what I have imagined.
It seems likely that Ardour will be accessible via OSC-via-WebSocket within
the next 10-15 days. Normally it would be sooner but I'm moving back to the
USA after months in Europe and there are lot of logistics to deal wth.
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Bengt Gördén <bengan(a)bag.org> wrote:
The subject is a reference to Paul Davies talk at
LAC2017
(https://youtu.be/tZbMfyBGPKo?list=PLpEMKw8jHgdRA3ydjZvt73q4Nc4W0
jvuz&t=11804)
I happened to come across a user interface for a DAW recently in a
Swedish magazine for home studio (online). The program is called Amped
Studio and is a cloud-based version of an DAW. Seems to be a sensible
user interface, maybe a bit simple for an DAW. But it could be how a
"The Future" might look like.
https://www.ampedstudio.com/
launch the app.
https://app.ampedstudio.com/
best,
--
/bengan
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
3:36 p.m.
"DAW-as-a-Service", as in "store your audio data on our computers and
outside of your own control, while using proprietary software that does
not even run on your own computer, but on a server somewhere and you
only see the browser-based UI"?
On Mon, 22 May 2017 14:42:17 +0200
Bengt Gördén <bengan(a)bag.org> wrote:
The subject is a reference to Paul Davies talk at
LAC2017
(https://youtu.be/tZbMfyBGPKo?list=PLpEMKw8jHgdRA3ydjZvt73q4Nc4W0jvuz&t=…)
I happened to come across a user interface for a DAW recently in a
Swedish magazine for home studio (online). The program is called Amped
Studio and is a cloud-based version of an DAW. Seems to be a sensible
user interface, maybe a bit simple for an DAW. But it could be how a
"The Future" might look like.
https://www.ampedstudio.com/
launch the app.
https://app.ampedstudio.com/
best,
--
/bengan
4:30 p.m.
I was commenting only on the visuals.
I have no enthusiasm or interest in "DAW-as-service".
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Johannes Kroll <j-kroll(a)gmx.de> wrote:
"DAW-as-a-Service", as in "store your
audio data on our computers and
outside of your own control, while using proprietary software that does
not even run on your own computer, but on a server somewhere and you
only see the browser-based UI"?
On Mon, 22 May 2017 14:42:17 +0200
Bengt Gördén <bengan(a)bag.org> wrote:
The subject is a reference to Paul Davies talk at
LAC2017
(https://youtu.be/tZbMfyBGPKo?list=PLpEMKw8jHgdRA3ydjZvt73q4Nc4W0
jvuz&t=11804)
I happened to come across a user interface for a DAW recently in a
Swedish magazine for home studio (online). The program is called Amped
Studio and is a cloud-based version of an DAW. Seems to be a sensible
user interface, maybe a bit simple for an DAW. But it could be how a
"The Future" might look like.
https://www.ampedstudio.com/
launch the app.
https://app.ampedstudio.com/
best,
--
/bengan
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
8:48 p.m.
On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:30:27 +0200
Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
I was commenting only on the visuals.
I have no enthusiasm or interest in "DAW-as-service".
Ok, decoupling the UI for a free DAW via OSC makes more sense. I tried
clicking together a simple GUI with open-stage-control for some code I
wrote in extempore. It seemed too sluggish for my taste. Not sure if
it is a browser issue (I tried Chrome and Firefox) or an issue with
open-stage-control, or an issue with browser-/javascript-based things
in general. It would be nice to be able to create browser-based GUIs on
the fly if the resulting UI would feel less sluggish.
23 May
23 May
8:30 a.m.
On 22/05/17 21:48, Johannes Kroll wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:30:27 +0200
Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
I've been using the GUI
interface to a Soundcraft Ui16 mixer - the response
seems quite adequate, so it should be feasible for a DAW. The browser is
Firefox on an old laptop running Linux Mint 17. Ethernet wired connection
to the mixer. I occasionally use an Android tablet over WiFi to it using
Chrome, again response seems quite adequate for a GUI. I haven't looked
into the code yet...
Bill
--
+----------------------------------------+
| Bill Purvis |
| email: bill(a)billp.org |
+----------------------------------------+
I was commenting only on the visuals.
I have no enthusiasm or interest in "DAW-as-service".
Ok, decoupling the
UI for a free DAW via OSC makes more sense. I tried
clicking together a simple GUI with open-stage-control for some code I
wrote in extempore. It seemed too sluggish for my taste. Not sure if
it is a browser issue (I tried Chrome and Firefox) or an issue with
open-stage-control, or an issue with browser-/javascript-based things
in general. It would be nice to be able to create browser-based GUIs on
the fly if the resulting UI would feel less sluggish. 
9:42 a.m.
On 23-05-17 10:30, Bill Purvis wrote:
On 22/05/17 21:48, Johannes Kroll wrote:
I have Soundcraft UI16 too, and see a websocket+JS updating the browser
DOM (see also Soundcraft's demo page
http://www.soundcraft.com/ui-demo/mixer.html) .
Note however that there is no sound travelling, just GUI updates, so you
don't actually hear what's going on, just see it (and control it).
Cheers,
Kees
On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:30:27 +0200
Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
I've been using the GUI
interface to a Soundcraft Ui16 mixer - the
response
seems quite adequate, so it should be feasible for a DAW. The browser is
Firefox on an old laptop running Linux Mint 17. Ethernet wired connection
to the mixer. I occasionally use an Android tablet over WiFi to it using
Chrome, again response seems quite adequate for a GUI. I haven't looked
into the code yet... I was commenting only on the visuals.
I have no enthusiasm or interest in "DAW-as-service".
Ok, decoupling the
UI for a free DAW via OSC makes more sense. I tried
clicking together a simple GUI with open-stage-control for some code I
wrote in extempore. It seemed too sluggish for my taste. Not sure if
it is a browser issue (I tried Chrome and Firefox) or an issue with
open-stage-control, or an issue with browser-/javascript-based things
in general. It would be nice to be able to create browser-based GUIs on
the fly if the resulting UI would feel less sluggish. 
2:39 p.m.
A quick reply that might be off topic.. (i am no developer)
I recently bought two Motu Ultralite AVB cards and have not used the
embedded html based mixer/configuration interface but i noticed that motu
have publshed both their web API as well as their OSC reference. Maybe Motu
did something good that can be helpful for Ardour web socket ideas ?
http://cdn-data.motu.com/downloads/audio/AVB/docs/MOTU%20AVB%20Web%20API.pdf
http://cdn-data.motu.com/downloads/audio/AVB/docs/OSC%20Quick%20Reference.p…
Sorry if that did not make any sense
Cheers
Anders
2017-05-23 11:42 GMT+02:00 Kees van Veen <kees.vanveen(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 23-05-17 10:30, Bill Purvis wrote:
On 22/05/17 21:48, Johannes Kroll wrote:
I have Soundcraft UI16 too, and see a websocket+JS updating the browser
DOM (see also Soundcraft's demo page http://www.soundcraft.com/ui-d
emo/mixer.html) .
Note however that there is no sound travelling, just GUI updates, so you
don't actually hear what's going on, just see it (and control it).
Cheers,
Kees
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:30:27 +0200
Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
I was commenting only on the visuals.
I've been using the GUI interface to a Soundcraft Ui16 mixer - the
response
seems quite adequate, so it should be feasible for a DAW. The browser is
Firefox on an old laptop running Linux Mint 17. Ethernet wired connection
to the mixer. I occasionally use an Android tablet over WiFi to it using
Chrome, again response seems quite adequate for a GUI. I haven't looked
into the code yet...
I have no enthusiasm or interest in "DAW-as-service".
Ok, decoupling the UI for a free DAW via OSC makes more sense. I tried
clicking together a simple GUI with open-stage-control for some code I
wrote in extempore. It seemed too sluggish for my taste. Not sure if
it is a browser issue (I tried Chrome and Firefox) or an issue with
open-stage-control, or an issue with browser-/javascript-based things
in general. It would be nice to be able to create browser-based GUIs on
the fly if the resulting UI would feel less sluggish.
22 May
22 May
4:54 p.m.
At 2017-05-22 kl. 17:36, Johannes Kroll wrote:
"DAW-as-a-Service", as in "store your
audio data on our computers and
outside of your own control,
while using proprietary software that does not even
run on your own
computer, but on a server
somewhere and you only see the browser-based UI"?
Or like this:
"DAW-as-a-open-Service", as in "store your audio data on our computers
and inside of your own control,
while using software that run on your own computers, but you only see
the browser-based UI"
It was merely an example on what Paul Davies said beginning at 3h16m41s
in the video.
Personally I think it's an interesting idea with browser based UI.
cheers,
--
/bengan
4:48 p.m.
On Tue, 23 May 2017, jonetsu wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:54:29 +0200
Bengt Gördén <bengan(a)bag.org> wrote:
It's in my "do to" list.... er, but not soon. ;)
(actually, I suppose it is possible now for some definition of mixing)
open stage control is not that bad if the http server part is on the same
machine as the DAW. It does allow one to have a web based interface now
for any OSC/MIDI controlable DAW. I have set Ardour up this way. I use
open stage control for testing with Ardour. It is much quicker and more
stable than TouchOSC or Control. (Control is the slowest of the bunch)
I have found for an android device, chrome works better than firefox.
--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
Personally I think it's an interesting idea
with browser based UI.
I'd like to be able to mix on the bus, remotely, using a smartphone and
earbuds, will this be possible ? :)
2535
days inactive
2536
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
10 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Anders Hellquist -
Bengt Gördén -
Bill Purvis -
Johannes Kroll -
jonetsu -
Kees van Veen -
Len Ovens -
Paul Davis