Hi Paul,
On 18 December 2012 11:48, Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
cultural heritage isn't about preserving the past
at the expense of the
present day culture. its about retaining cultural memory that gives whatever
the present day culture is doing some context. the efforts to create culture
devoid of historical context (i'm looking at you, adorno) have failed to
offer much to most of those who might receive it. you need that cultural
memory in order move - not necessarily forward, but just move, move in any
direction. if you don't understand where you are, your chances of going
anywhere interesting other than by pure chance are not very good.
This I almost entirely agree with. Culture without shared cultural
memory / experience is dull, and probably in reality impossible.
when people, when cultures build *objects* to signify
things of importance
to them (for whatever reason), it tends to follow that if you want to
understand them, and thus to some extent, to understand yourself, some kind
of appreciation for those objects is necessary. you need cultural heritage
to help appreciate those objects, and paradoxically, those objects are part
of the same cultural heritage that offers some chance of appreciation.
I don't believe the cultural significance lies in the *object* itself,
but in the stories and experiences around it. Things that are not
preservable, and eventually evolve or fade away - and a good thing
too, as that's how culture moves forward. We attempt to preserve what
we can but in many ways we cannot preserve what is important - we
venerate the object like a taxidermist preserves the body, but the
life is still gone. It is a fairly modern and (initially) Western
perspective. I'm not even saying I disagree with it, but I don't
think it is unambiguously a good thing.
On 18 December 2012 08:48, Lorenzo Sutton <lorenzofsutton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It's not clear if you'd like so-called
'philological' interpretations, that is interpretations which try to perform
Mozart's music in a way as accurately as
possible as it was performed in those days (e.g. using original or replica instruments
etc.) which is indeed very interesting,
Is this interesting? Acoustically perhaps, but we should not kid
ourselves that we are experiencing this in any way like it was
experienced in those days. Maybe we should have The Rite of Spring
performed in this hideous synthesized way - at least then the hostile
reaction might be more accurate! :-)
Best wishes,
Neil
--
Neil C Smith
Artist : Technologist : Adviser
http://neilcsmith.net
Praxis LIVE - open-source, graphical environment for rapid development
of intermedia performance tools, projections and interactive spaces -
http://code.google.com/p/praxis
OpenEye - specialist web solutions for the cultural, education,
charitable and local government sectors -
http://openeye.info