Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen <k.s.matheussen(a)notam02.no> writes:
My experience with 2.6, and also the impression I have
got from reading
linux-audio-dev, is actually the opposite. The 2.6.0 kernel is worse
for multimedia work, because the latency is higher than 2.4.0 with the
low-latency patch. I don't know mathematical that this is correct, but it
seems so.
This is my experience, too, comparing a 2.4 with low latency patches
to an unpatched 2.6 kernel.
To be fair, the unpatched 2.6 is a *lot* better than an unpatched 2.4,
enough better to actually be usable for many purposes, but not good
enough for serious low-latency audio.
Hopefully it is possible to make a low-latency patch
for the 2.6 kernel as
well?
This is definitely needed, IMHO.
--
joq