16 Jul
2005
16 Jul
'05
3:52 p.m.
Hi
I've stated using alsa modular synth, but there's been no traffic on the
list for a couple of days except my single post. Also It seems the
latest version of ams is almost one year old. Is this project dead? Or
it's user base small? Anybody here using it, for example?
If so, maybe someone here can supply me with a working example of the
analogue driver. It doesn't seem to work in any predictable way...
--
Peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk
16 Jul
16 Jul
4:24 p.m.
Hi,
--- Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi
I've stated using alsa modular synth, but there's
been no traffic on the
list for a couple of days except my single post.
Also It seems the
latest version of ams is almost one year old. Is
this project dead?
I'm clueless.
Or
it's user base small? Anybody here using it, for
example?
I used it as a jackd client a few months back. With an
Ardour session I duplicated the kick and snare tracks
at certain parts of the production and streamed them
into the "masher" plugin. Definitely cool stuff.
Unfortunately it was very unstable and I couldn't come
up with a recipe that would cause Segfaults. It was
very unpredictable.
If so, maybe someone here can supply me with a
working example of the
analogue driver.
I don't know what the analogue driver is. I use AMS as
a jackd client. I love using synthesis during mix
production but I'm afraid you won't learn much from
me. I'm just a novice.
ron
It doesn't seem to work in any
predictable way...
--
Peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
5:45 p.m.
R Parker wrote:
Unfortunately it was very unstable and I couldn't
come
up with a recipe that would cause Segfaults. It was
very unpredictable.
Actually the more I'm using it the more I get the same feeling. Crashes
quite often, and at unpredictable places...
Maybe I should look for something else...
--
Peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk
7:23 p.m.
Actually the more I'm using it the more I get the
same
feeling. Crashes quite often, and at unpredictable
places...
Currently, the author cannot spend time on ams -
unfortunately.
Yes. it likes to crash, and yes, it takes a lot of CPU. Any
vokunteers ;-) ?
Maybe I should look for something else...
In this case try Om.
Best regards
ce
4:59 p.m.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 07:52:29PM +0200, Atte Andr? Jensen wrote:
I've stated using alsa modular synth, but
there's been no traffic on the
list for a couple of days except my single post. Also It seems the
latest version of ams is almost one year old. Is this project dead? Or
it's user base small? Anybody here using it, for example?
If not dead, it's at least deeply frozen.
I used it briefly, but moved to Om (http://www.nongnu.org/om-synth/).
To me Om is superior in all regards.
---
Thorsten Wilms
5:47 p.m.
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
If not dead, it's at least deeply frozen.
I used it briefly, but moved to Om (http://www.nongnu.org/om-synth/).
To me Om is superior in all regards.
Seems quite young.
Tried to install it, but it seems to need dssi. I then downloaded that
but making it gives lot's of errors. Any chance a .deb of om is on the way?
--
Peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk
11:10 p.m.
A .deb would be too nice...
I would offer to work on it a little.
However, I would need some instructions.
Peace...
Atte André Jensen wrote:
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
If not dead, it's at least deeply frozen.
I used it briefly, but moved to Om (http://www.nongnu.org/om-synth/).
To me Om is superior in all regards.
Seems quite young.
Tried to install it, but it seems to need dssi. I then downloaded that
but making it gives lot's of errors. Any chance a .deb of om is on the
way?
17 Jul
17 Jul
1:10 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] old school
Does anyone have any info on the early open source audio software and
its compatible hardware? I have been looking around for a history type
page but not found anything yet.
1:38 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] old school
On Sun, 17 Jul, 2005 at 05:10PM +0100, John Mulholland spake thus:
Does anyone have any info on the early open source
audio software and
its compatible hardware? I have been looking around for a history type
page but not found anything yet.
If you don't find anything (and I wouldn't be too hopefull), people on
this list can probably tell you a lot.
And, if they do, make sure to write it down. Then the next person
that wants to find a page on linux/Free audio history will find one.
James
--
"I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated
Development
That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. Thank you."
(By Vance Petree, Virginia Power)
2:06 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] old school
John Mulholland wrote:
Does anyone have any info on the early open source
audio software and
its compatible hardware? I have been looking around for a history type
page but not found anything yet.
That history remains to be written, but here are some notes towards it:
Almost all the early UNIX-based software sound synthesis languages
were (and many still are) open-source. Such programs include Csound,
cmusic, Common Lisp Music, and most of the other MusicV-derived
languages. In addition, many tools such as Snd, Rt, and MiXViews were
open-source before Linux existed.
During the MIDI boom of the 1980s some DOS music/sound applications
had source code available, though rarely. More typically the authors
would respond to requests for sources, especially after cheap compilers
made it possible for desktop users to build their own binaries (I'm sure
that darned few of them did though). IIRC the RAVEL language included
its source code, and possibly some of the smaller utilities included
sources (or made sources available on request). The Atari seems to have
had a lot of people writing MIDI freeware, its again possible that
sources were available for some of that stuff too. Alas, the Mac ("the
computer for the rest of us", as long as you could afford one) situation
is unknown to me, but given its designed hostility towards hackers I
doubt there's much open-source history there for music and sound
software (I look forward to clarifying responses).
When I started using Linux in the mid-90s I was happy to find a lot
of source code for music/sound apps for SGI hardware. With much
assistance from people like Niccola Bernardini and Richard Kent I was
able to successfully port many of those apps to Linux. These programs
included Mix, Sono, Ceres, and other software from Oyvind Hammer at
NoTAM, the DAP editor by Richard Kent, and MiXViews by Doug Scott. Many
other open-source apps were available for SGI iron, but not all could be
ported to Linux.
I suggest writing to Bill Schottstaedt, Paul Lansky, and John ffitch
for a heads-up on Ye Olde Days. Those fellows are extremely knowledgable
about the early UNIX sound software. Brad Garton, Eric Lyons, and Dave
Topper can give you more info regarding later developments.
You can also reference Curtis Roads' great Computer Music Tutorial,
it's loaded with historical stuff, including some wonderful photos of
ancient gear. The book's a bit pricey, but you might score a good deal
for it on eBay.
HTH,
dp
2:25 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] old school
On 17 July 2005 at 17:10, John Mulholland <johnmulholland(a)fastmail.fm> wrote:
Does anyone have any info on the early open source
audio software and
its compatible hardware? I have been looking around for a history type
page but not found anything yet.
SoX was amongst the first open source audio software I ever used.
As I recall, I was using it in the early '80s.
Cheers....
--
Kevin
2:52 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of audio-related packages
by default?
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
6:11 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
paniq(a)paniq.org wrote:
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of audio-related packages
by default?
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
This is going to be obvious, but I use Fedora Core with the Planet CCRMA
configuration and apps. On my SMP/SCSI Raid workstation and with
Fluxbox window manager the ass is thoroughly kicked.
Frank
8:48 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
yep!
Multi track is running Fervent software and the mastering is running
FC3/Planet
My own box is running FC3 for admin/email
and the server is runing an old version of the hat not sure now!!!
All in all no windoze!!!!
Bob
pirrone wrote:
paniq(a)paniq.org wrote:
--
F R Smith
Technical Admin
http://www.Rokpacardiff.com
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of audio-related
packages by default?
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to be notably
adequate for audio production? why?
This is going to be obvious, but I use Fedora Core with the Planet
CCRMA configuration and apps. On my SMP/SCSI Raid workstation and
with Fluxbox window manager the ass is thoroughly kicked.
Frank
6:44 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
paniq(a)paniq.org wrote:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Debian Sid
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related packages
by default?
Yes, but, for the most part, I don't use the distro supplied audio
packages but build my own from source code (including low-latency kernel)
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
Sure, it works quite well, but like I said, a lot of what I use I build
myself rather than install pre-built packages.
-- Brett
--
Programmer by Day, Guitarist by Night
http://www.chapelperilous.net
http://www.alhazred.com
http://www.revelmoon.com
7:49 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 06:58:36PM +0200, paniq(a)paniq.org wrote:
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Gentoo.
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related packages
by default?
Yes. There are currently 301 packages in the media-sound category,
not counting different versions of the same package.
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
Yes. Most of the stuff I want "just works". The kernels come with
a good set of patches that I haven't had to tweak. (I do have to
configure and build my own kernel, but at least I don't have to patch).
And when occasionally I need to be bleeding-edge, it's trivial to
install a not-yet-stable version of some package. When not even that is
enough, the "emerge inject" command allows me to build software by hand
and tell the package system "don't worry, I've got this one covered".
This is the best mix of stability and bleeding-edge I've found so far.
The drawback is that package installation really does take a lot longer
than any other distro I've tried.
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
9:27 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
el Sun, 17 Jul 2005 17:49:56 -0400
Paul Winkler <pw_lists(a)slinkp.com> escribió:
The drawback is that package installation really does
take a lot longer
than any other distro I've tried.
you never used linux from scratch, i see.. :-)
i switched from LFS to gentoo not long ago, i can no longer afford the time
that it takes to install and maintain an LFS box right now.
about gentoo i can't say much about its performance yet or if it's specially
adequate for audio use. but about audio related software i can say that
there are ebuilds for virtually everything you might want to install. and if
you can't find an ebuild for a certain application it's quite easy to write
your own from the templates.
installing the system takes time but is not difficult, and installing
software is very easy indeed.
not that i particularly _like_ gentoo, i used lfs for years precisely
because i never liked _any_ linux distribution. and after using lfs even
less... but as i said i had to compromise, and i think that with gentoo you
can have a reasonable degree of control over your system.
HTH,
lj
7:55 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Gentoo.
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot
of
audio-related packages by default?
Yes, and most of them in relatively recent versions. The rest
can be installed by user contributed ebuilds or by building
them from source.
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be
notably adequate for audio production? why?
With a custom kernel, yes it is. But Gentoo surely isn't a
distro for the beginner. Much settings are done by editing
configuration files. There's no YaST or DrakConf.
Best regards
ce
8:55 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:57:22PM +0200, Christoph Eckert wrote:
With a custom kernel, yes it is.
...
I'm curious, what have you needed to change in the kernel?
I'm on gentoo-sources 2.6.11-r9 and it's been fine.
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
18 Jul
18 Jul
2:50 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
I'm curious, what have you needed to change in the
kernel?
I'm on gentoo-sources 2.6.11-r9 and it's been fine.
I've been running a vanilla 2.6.10 (no genkernel) with the
RT-LSM module loaded which was absolutely OK for my needs
(~16msecs latency on my cheap USB soundcard).
Unfortunately, I trashed this kernel when playing with some
webcams, so I currently run a 2.6.12 without any patches, but
I should build a realtime 2.6.12.
Unfortunately, I'm not that familiar with kernel building, and
since the RT-LSM module got dropped I'm in need on some info
how to build a 2.6.12 for audio work before I can continue
kernel exploring ;-) .
Best regards
ce
17 Jul
17 Jul
9:16 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:57:22PM +0200, Christoph Eckert wrote:
I also use Gentoo with the devel 2.6.12 kernel unpatched.
--
May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!
Dave Craig
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'"
--from _Nightfall_ by Asimov/Silverberg
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Gentoo.
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a
lot of
audio-related packages by default?
Yes, and most of them in relatively recent versions. The rest
can be installed by user contributed ebuilds or by building
them from source.
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use
to be
notably adequate for audio production? why?
With a custom kernel, yes it is. But Gentoo surely isn't a
distro for the beginner. Much settings are done by editing
configuration files. There's no YaST or DrakConf.
18 Jul
18 Jul
2:55 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
I also use Gentoo with the devel 2.6.12 kernel
unpatched.
I'm really surprised how many Gentoo users there are.
I used SuSE and Mandrake before. The commercial distros all
have the same disadvantage: Releases.
A Gentoo (or even a Debian based) box can easily kept
up-to-date, and that's an important thing especially when
using audio applications. New versions appear too frequently.
Best regards
ce
3:14 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Christoph Eckert wrote:
A Gentoo (or even a Debian based) box can easily kept
up-to-date, and that's an important thing especially when
using audio applications. New versions appear too frequently.
Yep, that's why I use Debian for the base packages like KDE, GTK+,
libsnd, etc., and build all my userspace audio apps from CVS... sure
it's all bleeding edge and stuff doesn't go well from time to time, but
I like to experiment and be the first on my block to have a Linux-based
studio (although I imagine I am the only one on my block to have a
studio of any kind...)
-- Brett
-----------
Programmer by day, Guitarist by Night
http://www.chapelperilous.net
http://www.alhazred.com
http://www.revelmoon.com
4:27 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Hi
I've got to admit since using the fervent software build I'm leaning
over to Debian
Does the planet install on Deb or just FC3+?
cheers
Bob
Christoph Eckert wrote:
--
F R Smith
Technical Admin
http://www.Rokpacardiff.com
I also use
Gentoo with the devel 2.6.12 kernel unpatched.
I'm really surprised how many Gentoo users there are.
I used SuSE and Mandrake before. The commercial distros all
have the same disadvantage: Releases.
A Gentoo (or even a Debian based) box can easily kept
up-to-date, and that's an important thing especially when
using audio applications. New versions appear too frequently.
Best regards
ce
19 Jul
19 Jul
6:30 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
2005/7/18, Frank smith <fsmith(a)walescomputers.co.uk>uk>:
Hi
I've got to admit since using the fervent software build I'm leaning
over to Debian
Does the planet install on Deb or just FC3+?
for deb try agnula demudi
cheers
Bob
Christoph Eckert wrote:
--
F R Smith
Technical Admin
http://www.Rokpacardiff.com
I also use
Gentoo with the devel 2.6.12 kernel unpatched.
I'm really surprised how many Gentoo users there are.
I used SuSE and Mandrake before. The commercial distros all
have the same disadvantage: Releases.
A Gentoo (or even a Debian based) box can easily kept
up-to-date, and that's an important thing especially when
using audio applications. New versions appear too frequently.
Best regards
ce
17 Jul
17 Jul
8:21 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Gentoo
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related
packages
by default?
most of what I need are provided with recent versions, I had to build my
own kernel for the 2.6 series to get the best result.
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate
for
audio production? why?
Of course ! I use it because it is easily and highly customizable as the
apps are mostly compiled and then match exactly your hardware.
The genkernel utility is cool if you are a beginner into kernel compilation.
Gentoo has the best stability so far with my USB soundcard, after having
tested the DeMuDi, the AudioSlack and the Planet CCRMA with Fedora core 3.
Regards
Philippe
8:56 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Of course ! I use it because it is easily and highly
customizable as the apps are mostly compiled and then match
exactly your hardware.
I'd like to add that - before you emerge a package - it is
necessary to set the so called USE-flags properly. Otherwise
it can happen that the application does not behave as
expected - and recompilation is usually a timeconsuming
task ;-) .
Best regards
ce
9:04 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Hi, want to chime in to the gentoo-fan-singing:
On 7/17/05, paniq(a)paniq.org <paniq(a)paniq.org> wrote:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
The one and only Gentoo!!!
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related packages
by default?
Yeah, and if it doesn't I write my own ebuilds or just install the
cvs-versions in my homedir (which isn't needed for a lot of apps thats
for sure!).
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
As you do everything yourself it is you and only you who decides which
services do run and which settings are made. So you get a very slink
and lean and fast and optimised system.
And as you have to wait for every package to compile, you don't
install many packages just for fun. At least not on your
music-machine...
Altough gentoo is great for everyone willing to learn about linux or
already deeply involved, gentoo isn't a distribution for the
beginners...
Arnold
--
Wenn man mit Raubkopien Bands wie Brosis oder Britney Spears wirklich
verhindern könnte, würde ich mir noch heute einen Stapel Brenner und
einen Sack Rohlinge kaufen.
18 Jul
18 Jul
12:16 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 06:58:36PM +0200, paniq(a)paniq.org wrote:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
AGNULA DeMuDi, a customized version of Debian. The recently released
DeMuDi 1.2.1 has been the easiest Linux distribution I have ever
installed (since 1997), with the least amount of post-installation
configuration necessary--
http://demudi.agnula.org/
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related packages
by default?
Yes. It is geared toward exactly that--customizng Debian for audio and
multimedia purposes. It includes and installs a large quantity of
diverse audio/multimedia programs, and one can always download more
using Debian's apt tools (synaptic, aptitude, apt-get).
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
It serves my own needs very well as a musician and sometime composer,
and has been stable, dependable and loads of fun.
-sd
----------------------------------------------------------------
Cats are animals that know what their rights are. -Eli Khamarov
----------------------------------------------------------------
6:46 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
On 7/17/05, paniq(a)paniq.org <paniq(a)paniq.org> wrote:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Archlinux.
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related packages
by default?
Not really. I'm not up to date with the latest packages, but the
last
time I checked, there were not so many available. Especially
Software-Synthesizers and Programming Languages like CSound or PD are
not available. But it's easy to create your own packages in Arch, so
that's no real problem...
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
I think others may be more adequate for audio production,
because it
involves quite a bit of work to get everything working. But I really
like the way Arch "ticks", so I never considered switching to another
distro.
-Michael
10:29 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
--- paniq(a)paniq.org wrote:
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
A/Demudi 1.2.1 based on Debian Sarge
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot
of audio-related packages
by default?
Yes. Like CCRMA this distro is intended to be used
for music/audio production. What isn't there I get
from Sarge repositories or build from source.
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
Yes (see answer to "b"). Real-Time capabilites
are
very good "out of the box" and most apps work reliably
together with little configuration needed on the
user's shoulders... Less time spent tweaking and
configuring the system = more time for actually making
music!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
In a world without walls who needs gates or windows?
--unknown
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
3:09 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 18:58 +0200, paniq(a)paniq.org wrote:
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Mandrake 10.2
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related packages
by default?
Not a lot, although it's a lot better now than it was a few months ago.
I usually compile audio software from source and build my own RPM
packages using checkinstall when the Mandrake version is too old or
doesn't exist.
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
I have no idea, I haven't really done any audio production.
--
Lars Luthman
PGP key: http://www.d.kth.se/~d00-llu/pgp_key.php
Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E
3:38 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
On 7/17/05, paniq(a)paniq.org <paniq(a)paniq.org> wrote:
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Gentoo. (kernel is gentoo-sources patched with rt-lsm and realtime-preempt)
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related packages
by default?
There are quite a few, but there are several not yet included that I
build by hand.
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
Yes. Gentoo is a "ricer" distro that allows one to easily tweek and
modify the system to perform and behave to one's liking.
5:34 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Alle 18:58, domenica 17 luglio 2005, paniq(a)paniq.org ha scritto:
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
PCLinuxOS
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related
packages by default?
Cause it is a Mandrake derivated and Thac supports it... yes there are a lot
of audio packages! And more, because I packaged myself some other audio rpms
that Mandrake have not...
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate
for audio production? why?
Yes... "apt-get install ardour qjackctl jack jamin" is enough to have a full
studio!
--
-----------------------------------------------
Gianluca Romanin
aka J_Zar
-----------------------------------------------
--
-----------------------------------------------
Gianluca Romanin
aka J_Zar
-----------------------------------------------
19 Jul
19 Jul
4:05 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
J_Zar wrote:
Alle 18:58, domenica 17 luglio 2005, paniq(a)paniq.org ha
scritto:
:) Off topic but how did you get turned onto PClinuxOS? Was it from
this list?
R~
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
PCLinuxOS
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a
lot of audio-related
packages by default?
Cause it is a Mandrake derivated and Thac supports it... yes there are a lot
of audio packages! And more, because I packaged myself some other audio rpms
that Mandrake have not...
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use
to be notably adequate
for audio production? why?
Yes... "apt-get install ardour qjackctl jack jamin" is enough to have a full
studio!
5:22 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Alle 18:07, martedì 19 luglio 2005, Russell Hanaghan ha scritto:
J_Zar wrote:
Well... I was searching for a Mandrake alternative because I dislike limited
free Mandrake repositories... Searching on the net I found PCLoS... I found a
well established community (pclinuxonline.com)... I tryed the boot CD and I
was astonished from the power of that stuff... Then I installed it and I am
very happy of this distrib. I used lot of distros in my pcs (each one for
several months): Fedora / RH (1 year), Mandrake (4 years), Debian (3 months),
knoppix hd installed (2 months), Ubuntu (this one only few weeks), Mepis (2
months)....
Actually.. I'm happy with PCLoS... and I think it can be a good choise for
many users!
Cheers,
--
-----------------------------------------------
Gianluca Romanin
aka J_Zar
-----------------------------------------------
Alle 18:58, domenica 17 luglio 2005,
paniq(a)paniq.org ha scritto:
:) Off topic but how did you get turned onto PClinuxOS? Was it from
this list?
R~
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
PCLinuxOS
5:44 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, J_Zar wrote:
Alle 18:07, marted� 19 luglio 2005, Russell Hanaghan
ha scritto:
At the risk of straying even further off-topic, can I ask what you didn't like
about Debian, that it was so bad that it only lasted 3 months? It's next on my
list to try, after my somewhat unimaginative history of Slackware (2 years)
Redhat( 4 years, until they pulled the plug), Gentoo (about 6 months and
loving it).
The main thing I love about gentoo (other than the geek factor) is the emerge
facility, which I gather I get about the same with debian's apt-get. So I
thought I should try it.
J_Zar wrote:
Well... I was searching for a Mandrake alternative because I dislike limited
free Mandrake repositories... Searching on the net I found PCLoS... I found a
well established community (pclinuxonline.com)... I tryed the boot CD and I
was astonished from the power of that stuff... Then I installed it and I am
very happy of this distrib. I used lot of distros in my pcs (each one for
several months): Fedora / RH (1 year), Mandrake (4 years), Debian (3 months),
knoppix hd installed (2 months), Ubuntu (this one only few weeks), Mepis (2
months).... Alle 18:58, domenica 17 luglio 2005,
paniq(a)paniq.org ha scritto:
:) Off topic but how did you get turned onto PClinuxOS? Was it from
this list?
R~
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
PCLinuxOS
6:55 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Gentoo (about 6 months and
loving it).
The main thing I love about gentoo (other than the geek
factor) is the emerge facility, which I gather I get about
the same with debian's apt-get. So I thought I should try
it.
"At the risk of straying even further off-topic, can I ask
what you " ;-) , may I ask you why you want to drop Gentoo
and use Debian (guess: compile times :) ?
Best regards
ce
7:26 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Christoph Eckert wrote:
You guessed right, mostly. It's also so that when people say "why don't
you use Debian" I can have something to say other than "I've never tried
it".
Both somewhat weak answers, but part of the Linux culture seems to be
trying new things out, eh?
And there never seems to be an end to the old machines that can be
resurrected by Linux.
Gentoo (about 6 months and
loving it).
The main thing I love about gentoo (other than the geek
factor) is the emerge facility, which I gather I get about
the same with debian's apt-get. So I thought I should try
it.
"At the risk of straying even further off-topic, can I ask
what you " ;-) , may I ask you why you want to drop Gentoo
and use Debian (guess: compile times :) ?
8:49 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Hi,
You guessed right, mostly. It's also so that when
people
say "why don't you use Debian" I can have something to say
other than "I've never tried it".
You cannot have had any girlfriend on this planet ;-) .
Both somewhat weak answers, but part of the Linux
culture
seems to be trying new things out, eh?
Yes, but Gentoo feels more modern than Debian. Debian is
always a bit antiquated, while Gentoo tried to adopt new
technologies as soon as possible. Perfectly fits "trying new
things out" :) .
Have fun with Debian!
And there never seems to be an end to the old machines
that
can be resurrected by Linux.
So don't use KDE :) .
Best regards
ce
20 Jul
20 Jul
9:29 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Last Tuesday 19 July 2005 22:05, michael(a)michaelshiloh.com was like:
You guessed right, mostly. It's also so that when
people say "why don't
you use Debian" I can have something to say other than "I've never tried
it".
By the opposite token, this thread is making me consider setting up a gentoo
partition on one of my machines, just to try it out. I'm running pretty
low-end (recycled even) hardware, so compile times may force me to build a
small specific set-up as suggested.
BTW: Debian / DeMuDi for 3 years and counting. Ubuntu is good for general
desktop / client machines, great for newbies, I got fed up with hoary after 2
weeks and decided that a few extra features didn't compare to sarge's broad
based stability. That said, I'm finding Ubuntu very useful for frontline
advocacy so I'm using it on the two client machines at 'work'.
I have now come to the conclusion that all Debian based systems, especially
A/DeMuDi and Ubuntu are now easier to install _and_ configure than Microsoft
Windows XP as well as being much easier and safer to upgrade.
I think that's a neat turnaround. ;]
Both somewhat weak answers, but part of the Linux
culture seems to be
trying new things out, eh?
And there never seems to be an end to the old machines that can be
resurrected by Linux.
Indeed!:)
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk
9:54 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Both somewhat
weak answers, but part of the Linux culture seems to be
trying new things out, eh?
And there never seems to be an end to the old machines that can be
resurrected by Linux.
Indeed!:)
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk
10:38 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Last Wednesday 20 July 2005 13:54, John Mulholland was like:
I have found a great piece of software called Bootit
NG that allows me
to easily try out a few different distros all on the same machine. You
load this sofware at bootup, it then extends the Master Boot Record of
your computer. This allows you more flexibility with partitions and so
on. I am sure this could all be done by an individual distro, buts its
nice to be able to have a program which is point and click simple.
It's not open source sadly :( but it is shareware, and if I recall, its
not too expensive either. I use to use in a test lab to quickly simulate
different MS OSes on the same hardware. But dont let that put you off,
its very linux friendly!
What does it do that GRUB doesn't?
cheers,
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk
11 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Last Wednesday 20 July 2005 13:54, John Mulholland was
like:
I dont really know what GRUB can and can not do, so cant give that
comparison. For those who have an intricate knowledge of GRUB and fancy
doing a comparison. Here is the BING feature list:
http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/bootitng.html
I have found a great piece of software called
Bootit NG that allows me
to easily try out a few different distros all on the same machine. You
load this sofware at bootup, it then extends the Master Boot Record of
your computer. This allows you more flexibility with partitions and so
on. I am sure this could all be done by an individual distro, buts its
nice to be able to have a program which is point and click simple.
It's not open source sadly :( but it is shareware, and if I recall, its
not too expensive either. I use to use in a test lab to quickly simulate
different MS OSes on the same hardware. But dont let that put you off,
its very linux friendly!
What does it do that GRUB doesn't?
19 Jul
19 Jul
8:18 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Alle 21:24, martedì 19 luglio 2005, michael(a)michaelshiloh.com ha scritto:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, J_Zar wrote:
[A little OT!]
Well... I think Debian is really good and functional but it is very far from
my mind... Especially in config files places and some other stuff (not
similar with RH based distributions)... ;-D
Although, even if there was some exceptions (Ubuntu and Mepis was not so good
as I expected...), I never give up for distrib issues... but only for taste!
A distribution or another one is really a personal choise. There is no evil
and no heaven. I think the user make the difference: how deep you know your
distribution? Do you know where to put your hands? The X distribution can
make difference thinking in time losses? Usability for you? Facilities and
config times?
These are good questions for choosing the right distribution. ;-)
Don't expect geek factors or guru-dreams: I think that a deep knowledge of
your system make the geek-factor and trasforms you in a guru! ;-P
Cheers,
--
-----------------------------------------------
Gianluca Romanin
aka J_Zar
-----------------------------------------------
Alle 18:07, martedì 19 luglio 2005, Russell
Hanaghan ha scritto:
At the risk of straying even further off-topic, can I ask what you didn't
like about Debian, that it was so bad that it only lasted 3 months? It's
next on my list to try, after my somewhat unimaginative history of
Slackware (2 years) Redhat( 4 years, until they pulled the plug), Gentoo
(about 6 months and loving it).
The main thing I love about gentoo (other than the geek factor) is the
emerge facility, which I gather I get about the same with debian's apt-get.
So I thought I should try it. J_Zar wrote:
Well... I was searching for a Mandrake alternative because I dislike
limited free Mandrake repositories... Searching on the net I found
PCLoS... I found a well established community (pclinuxonline.com)... I
tryed the boot CD and I was astonished from the power of that stuff...
Then I installed it and I am very happy of this distrib. I used lot of
distros in my pcs (each one for several months): Fedora / RH (1 year),
Mandrake (4 years), Debian (3 months), knoppix hd installed (2 months),
Ubuntu (this one only few weeks), Mepis (2 months).... Alle 18:58, domenica 17 luglio 2005,
paniq(a)paniq.org ha scritto:
> a simple poll for your ml people here:
>
> a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
PCLinuxOS
:) Off topic but how did you get turned onto PClinuxOS? Was it from
this list?
R~
20 Jul
20 Jul
12:02 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
J_Zar wrote:
Alle 18:07, martedì 19 luglio 2005, Russell Hanaghan ha
scritto:
Agreed on all counts! Texstar and his all stars have made a solid
effort here....and with Thac onboard, well that was just cream!
I dropped the ball due to many life issues but I still intend on getting
back to creating a live bootable remastered from Pclos with all the cool
audio apps. Make a great starter Linux Audio CD for someone. It really
is the easiest install I have ever come across.
Cheers...
P.S. The Efnet IRC channel is pretty active too...maybe I'll see you there?
R~
J_Zar wrote:
Well... I was searching for a Mandrake alternative because I dislike limited
free Mandrake repositories... Searching on the net I found PCLoS... I found a
well established community (pclinuxonline.com)... I tryed the boot CD and I
was astonished from the power of that stuff... Then I installed it and I am
very happy of this distrib. I used lot of distros in my pcs (each one for
several months): Fedora / RH (1 year), Mandrake (4 years), Debian (3 months),
knoppix hd installed (2 months), Ubuntu (this one only few weeks), Mepis (2
months)....
Actually.. I'm happy with PCLoS... and I think it can be a good choise for
many users!
Cheers,
Alle 18:58, domenica 17 luglio 2005,
paniq(a)paniq.org ha scritto:
:) Off topic but how did you get turned onto PClinuxOS? Was it from
this list?
R~
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
PCLinuxOS
2:26 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Russell Hanaghan wrote:
J_Zar wrote:
A live bootable Linux CD especially created for Linux Audio use? WHat a
perfect idea! I'd love to be involved/informed. If you create a mailing
list please put me on it.
Imagine having this on your keychain on a USB thumb drive; plug it in to
a random PC, reboot, and there you are with a full audio studio.
Storing songs would be a bit of an issue, but even if it was for
demonstration purposes only it would be very well worth it.
M
Alle 18:07, marted� 19 luglio 2005, Russell
Hanaghan ha scritto:
Agreed on all counts! Texstar and his all stars have made a solid effort
here....and with Thac onboard, well that was just cream!
I dropped the ball due to many life issues but I still intend on getting back
to creating a live bootable remastered from Pclos with all the cool audio
apps. Make a great starter Linux Audio CD for someone. It really is the
easiest install I have ever come across. J_Zar wrote:
Well... I was searching for a Mandrake alternative because I dislike
limited free Mandrake repositories... Searching on the net I found
PCLoS... I found a well established community (pclinuxonline.com)... I
tryed the boot CD and I was astonished from the power of that stuff...
Then I installed it and I am very happy of this distrib. I used lot of
distros in my pcs (each one for several months): Fedora / RH (1 year),
Mandrake (4 years), Debian (3 months), knoppix hd installed (2 months),
Ubuntu (this one only few weeks), Mepis (2 months)....
Actually.. I'm happy with PCLoS... and I think it can be a good choise for
many users!
Cheers,
Alle 18:58, domenica 17 luglio 2005,
paniq(a)paniq.org ha scritto:
> a simple poll for your ml people here:
>
> a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
>
>
PCLinuxOS
Off topic but how did you get turned onto PClinuxOS? Was it from
this list?
R~
3:02 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
A live bootable Linux CD especially created for Linux
Audio use? WHat
a
perfect idea! I'd love to be involved/informed. If
you create a
mailing
list please put me on it.
Imagine having this on your keychain on a USB thumb drive; plug it in
to
a random PC, reboot, and there you are with a full
audio studio.
Storing songs would be a bit of an issue, but even if it was for
demonstration purposes only it would be very well worth it.
M
this week at Bi-Mon-Sci-Fi-Con!
Or over a network one could have audio terminals... I wonder what people
could do with hifi multitracking drum machine FX rack telephones. And
soon with software radio engineering... it will all be wireless. What a
mess that will be.
Currently running a very unstable debian unstable on a handful of
laptops of friends who know nothing about linux and always get pissed at
me for the problems... but thanks to VNC, they're very slowly learning.
Also using debian to run an online college radio station, manage my home
network, and serve up the latest Rowntree Records recordings:
http://rowntreerecords.kicks-ass.net/archive/works_in_progress/
anti-social hoosier lofi garage rock: all recorded using a Tascam
4-Track, Lexicon Omega Digital USB, JACK, Ardour, Audacity... and other
stuff layin around we can put gum and aluminum foil onto.
JUST GOT OUR FIRST LP BACK FROM THE PRESSING!!!!! Now begins the tedious
process of handprinting all our covers...
18 Jul
18 Jul
5:58 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
paniq(a)paniq.org wrote:
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Yet another Gentoo user.
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related packages
by default?
As others have said - there's lots readily available.
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
It's infinitely tweakable, and easily upgraded. I have a personal
preference for Gentoo because it's what I know. Debian also very good,
and as robust as Gentoo.
R
7:11 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Le Dimanche 17 Juillet 2005 18:58, paniq(a)paniq.org a écrit :
Hi,
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Debian/sid
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related
packages by default?
Yes.
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate
for audio production? why?
Yes. I just have a custom 2.6 kernel. Debian fit my needs not only for audio.
bye
8 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Em Dom 17 Jul 2005 13:58, paniq(a)paniq.org escreveu:
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Slackware
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of audio-related
packages by default?
No. But you can download in http://www.audioslack.com
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate
for audio production? why?
No. Need a lot of work... But I like it :-)
André Alves Pereira
André Magoo
20 Jul
20 Jul
4:49 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
slackware : )
source compiled modified kernel with lck patch..
http://www.plumlocosoft.com/kernel/
alsa and jack compiled from source
yeah, its work. but i like slackware too.. i know what i need and
haven't any problems compiling sourcecode..
nathand
On 7/18/05, André Alves Pereira <andre.pereira(a)ig.com.br> wrote:
Em Dom 17 Jul 2005 13:58, paniq(a)paniq.org escreveu:
--
contact: nathan(a)patternmedia.com
pattern media - http://patternmedia.com/
pattern records - http://patternrecords.com
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Slackware
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of audio-related
packages by default?
No. But you can download in http://www.audioslack.com
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use
to be notably adequate
for audio production? why?
No. Need a lot of work... But I like it :-)
André Alves Pereira
André Magoo
18 Jul
18 Jul
8:04 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Last Sunday 17 July 2005 17:58, paniq(a)paniq.org was like:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
A/DeMuDi
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related
packages by default?
Yep.
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate
for audio production? why?
Because it's built to be good for audio production. And it is.
cheers,
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk
20 Jul
20 Jul
4:34 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
paniq(a)paniq.org writes:
what (linux) distribution do you use?
I run my own distro of GNU/Linux;)
--
Esben Stien is b0ef@e s a
http://www. s t n m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
[sip|iax]: e e
jid:b0ef@ n n
5 Aug
5 Aug
7:58 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
søn, 17,.07.2005 kl. 18.58 +0200, skrev paniq(a)paniq.org:
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Ubuntu Warty w. homemade
2.6.12-rt-preempt kernel
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related packages
by default?
I have backported rlimits, jack, ardur... from Demudi/Debian unstable
and other sources.
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to
be notably adequate for
audio production? why?
I can run ardour/jack reliably with my old sblive at 5,3ms
latency, and have Ubuntu's
polished desktop.
--
Frode Haugsgjerd
Norway
9:37 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Frode Haugsgjerd wrote:
søn, 17,.07.2005 kl. 18.58 +0200, skrev
paniq(a)paniq.org:
>a simple poll for your ml people here:
>
>a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Slackware 10.1, kernel 2.6.12 (vanilla and rt+preempt) handrolled.
>b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot
of audio-related packages
>by default?
Hmmm... no, almost everything compiled from sources. :)
salvuz@slack101-sal:~$ ls /var/log/packages/|grep sal|wc
185
Almost all audio and video packages and libraries.
>c.) do you consider the distribution that you use
to be notably adequate for
>audio production? why?
I think every distribution, once its kernel and packages are well
configured, can be adequate for audio production.
I prefer starting from a Slackware system because of its robustness and
simplicity in tailoring it to your needs, and IMHO it's easier to add,
remove, modify, repackage, test packages... once acquainted with the
absence of dependency checking... :) ,but I must say once you have built
and installed the "base dependencies" (libsndfile, fftw, libsamplerate,
..., etc) it's not that nightmare, if you want to put your hands under
the hood (but if you want you can use "thir party" tools to manage
dependencies, such as swaret or slapt-get...)
I like the "keep it simple" philosophy I feel in Slackware.
But again, I really think every distribution, once its kernel and
packages are well configured, can be adequate for audio production.
Naturally, the more complex it is, the more work has to be done on it,
the more "straightforward for common user" it will be, but this applies
to any distro, IMHO...
I can run ardour/jack reliably with my old sblive at
5,3ms latency, and have Ubuntu's
polished desktop.
Same here, but... Have you ever suffered the "occasional crackling
problem" I posted here and on jackit-devel ?
ciao
--
salvuz
POST FATA RESVRGO
Linux registered user #291700 | machine #174619
get counted on ---> http://counter.li.org/ <---
9:56 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
mainly :
APODIO (based on mandrake) http://www.apodio.org (audio & video)
AGNULA : http://www.agnula.org (audio)
MANDRAKE : http://www.linuxiso.org/distro.php?distro=29
sometimes :
Debian : http://debian.org
dynebolic : http://dynebolic.org (audio & video)
fedora : http://www.linuxiso.org/distro.php?distro=64
...etc
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of
audio-related packages
by default?
yes that the case with APODIO, AGNULA and DYNEBOLIC
c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to be
notably adequate for
audio production? why?
For audio production (studio recording, post-production, composition,
webradio & radio broadcast, real-time concerts & installation...etc)
it's excelent!! I was under macinsto$h world before, using different
"pro" audio tools and since 3/4 years I only works with linux in audio
production, and I could work as "pro" in all the production I want to do.
It's adequate because I could realize all the works I need to do :
recording sounds (jackit, qarecord, jackmix, ardour, rezound, audacity,
mhwaveedit...etc), mixing it (ardour, audacity...etc), masterized it
(jamin, rezound...), produce CD (K3B, Gcombust...), produce webcasting
(icecast, ices, puredata...) & jukebox (zina...), real time concerts &
installation (puredata, jackit, jack-rack, FreqTweak, terminatorX,
spiralSynthModular...)... and it's poilitcal & ethically in the way I
want to work with art (GNU, copyleft, GPL...), it's based on relation
between people and the human being not on business and personnal profit...
julien
11:12 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
Now using 64studio on AMD 64
>
>
Its a studio and works!
a simple poll for your ml people here:
a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
64 studio Debian
b.) does the distribution that you use supply a
lot of audio-related
packages by default?
Yes as much 64 bit as has been ported
> c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to be notably
> adequate for audio production? why?
For audio production (studio recording,
post-production, masteringBob
Bearmusic
www.hearmymusic.co.uk
2:56 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] what distro do you use?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
paniq(a)paniq.org schrieb:
| a simple poll for your ml people here:
|
| a.) what (linux) distribution do you use?
Suse 9.3 and Mandriva 10.2
|
| b.) does the distribution that you use supply a lot of audio-related
packages
| by default?
|
both have lots of Packages available. Suse tends to cut the
Audiopackages in the default install to be "fit" for the US-Market,
where Audiosoftware must be crippled because of the bizarre US-Patent-Law.
| c.) do you consider the distribution that you use to be notably
adequate for
| audio production? why?
|
both are but i tend to prefer Suse/Novell for it comes with a very good
Environment to build Packages from source and it has better
Hardware-Support than others.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC85u31Aecwva1SWMRAnfpAJ91CdfY2uH0dSbXeKS0cWIN35s4oQCfQpoI
NnmhJnI200w1OajWilREpVA=
=MbAh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Jul
17 Jul
7:39 a.m.
I've stated using alsa modular synth, but
there's been no traffic on the
list for a couple of days except my single post. Also It seems the
latest version of ams is almost one year old. Is this project dead? Or
it's user base small? Anybody here using it, for example?
I use it as a central piece of my soundsystem, no fallback to mention
except the fact that I have reach the limit of my old kernel 2.4.28 on my
gentoo box with it. In fact, I had to create additionnal stereo modules,
but it reveals to be unstable. So I have switched to the last preemptive
kernel 2.6.12 and the result is more than correct :)
To have ams working stable with my big patch, I must not move some windows
modules. If I don't tweak ams with the mouse interaction, I can of course
modify the parameters by midi with no problems, ams is solid as a rock for
me.
If so, maybe someone here can supply me with a working
example of the
analogue driver. It doesn't seem to work in any predictable way...
Sorry I don't use this...
Is there any ebuild for Om ?
Regards
Philippe
10:44 a.m.
Dubphil wrote:
I use it as a centraI have reach the limit of my old
kernel 2.4.28 on my
gentoo box with it. In fal piece of my soundsystem, no fallback to mention
except the fact that...
<snip>
... ams is solid as a rock for
me.
Hmm, interresting. Which version of ams are you running? Are you using
ladspa modules? I just fired ams ud with one of the problematic patches
and I've been jamin away for 10+ minutes without any problem.
My problem is that I mostly use my setup live, so stability and
predictability is *very* important for me...
Is there any ebuild for Om ?
Dunno...
--
.''`. Peace, love & harmony
: :' : Atte
`. `'
`- http://www.atte.dk
10:55 a.m.
Atte André Jensen wrote:
...I've been jamin away for 10+ minutes without
any problem.
I get strange behaviour with the valve saturation plugin. If I stop
playing ams will east 50% of my cpu. Doesn't happen with other ladspa
modules.
I attached the problematic patch, could someone verify that behaviour on
their systems?
--
.''`. Peace, love & harmony
: :' : Atte
`. `'
`- http://www.atte.dk
Module 21 1 167 15 4 0
ColorP 0 1 1 4 250 200 50 180 180 180
ColorP 3 0 1 4 250 200 50 180 180 180
FSlider 1 0 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 1 0 0 0 163840 1
FSlider 1 2 0 0 0 163840 1
FSlider 1 3 16384 0 1638 163840 1
FSlider 1 4 16384 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 5 16384 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 6 16384 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 7 16384 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 8 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 9 0 0 0 102940 1
FSlider 1 10 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 11 0 0 0 102940 1
FSlider 1 12 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 13 0 0 0 102940 1
FSlider 1 14 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 15 0 0 0 102940 1
FSlider 1 16 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 17 138 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 18 8192 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 19 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 20 16384 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 21 1638 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 22 14745 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 23 1638 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 24 13107 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 25 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 26 11468 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 27 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 28 8192 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 29 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 30 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 31 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 32 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 33 24 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 34 16384 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 35 1638 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 36 14745 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 37 1638 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 38 13107 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 39 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 40 11468 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 41 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 42 8192 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 43 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 44 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 45 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 46 8123 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 47 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 48 16384 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 49 4168 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 50 5935 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 51 5685 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 52 231 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 53 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 54 138 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 55 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 56 92 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 57 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 58 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 59 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 60 554 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 61 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 62 16384 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 63 115 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 64 14745 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 65 1638 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 66 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 67 115 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 68 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 69 163 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 70 0 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 1 71 0 0 0 16384 1
ISlider 1 0 3 1
ISlider 1 1 0 1
ISlider 1 2 1 1
ISlider 1 3 1 1
ISlider 1 4 0 1
ISlider 1 5 2 1
ISlider 1 6 1 1
ISlider 1 7 0 1
ISlider 1 8 3 1
ISlider 1 9 1 1
ISlider 1 10 0 1
ISlider 1 11 4 1
ISlider 1 12 1 1
ComboBox 1 0 0 1
ComboBox 1 1 0 1
ComboBox 1 2 0 1
ComboBox 1 3 0 1
Module 7 3 576 286 0 0
ColorP 0 0 3 10 250 200 50 180 180 180
ColorP 1 1 3 10 250 200 50 180 180 180
FSlider 3 0 5663 0 0 8772 1
FSlider 3 1 8192 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 3 2 8192 0 0 16384 1
ComboBox 3 0 0 1
FSMIDI 3 0 10 2 7
Module 10 4 10 8 0 0
FSlider 4 0 0 0 -16384 16384 1
ISlider 4 0 0 1
ComboBox 4 0 0 1
Module 4 8 223 295 0 0
ColorP 0 0 8 12 250 200 50 180 180 180
FSlider 8 0 163840 0 79984 163840 1
FSMIDI 8 0 10 2 94
Module 32 10 385 260 4 0
ColorP 0 0 10 12 250 200 50 180 180 180
ColorP 1 0 10 8 250 200 50 180 180 180
ColorP 2 0 10 11 250 200 50 180 180 180
FSlider 10 0 0 1 -150902 37725 1
FSlider 10 1 0 1 -150902 11356 1
FSlider 10 2 0 0 -16384 16384 1
FSlider 10 3 -17342 1 -150902 11356 1
FSlider 10 4 -16384 0 -16384 16384 1
FSlider 10 5 -42729 1 -150902 11356 1
FSlider 10 6 16384 0 -16384 16384 1
FSlider 10 7 0 1 -150902 11356 1
FSlider 10 8 0 0 -16384 16384 1
CheckBox 10 0 0 1
CheckBox 10 1 0 1
CheckBox 10 2 0 1
CheckBox 10 3 0 1
CheckBox 10 4 0 1
CheckBox 10 5 0 1
CheckBox 10 6 0 1
CheckBox 10 7 0 1
Module 4 11 222 389 0 0
ColorP 0 0 11 8 250 200 50 180 180 180
FSlider 11 0 163840 0 79984 163840 1
FSMIDI 11 0 10 2 94
Module 6 12 94 222 0 valve_1209 valve
ColorP 0 0 12 1 250 200 50 180 180 180
FSlider 12 0 13043 0 0 16384 1
FSlider 12 1 1509 0 0 16384 1
8:46 p.m.
Christoph Eckert wrote:
Hmmm. Here it about 50% on a P4 notebook, 2.4G, so about comparable
systems...
I think I found out more. It only happens if the valve saturation plugin
is left without input for some time. I can trigger it *every* time and
make it go away *every* time.
Of course this might be a bug in a number of places. Might also be my
specific combination of versions/kernel/refrigerator :-)
--
.''`. Peace, love & harmony
: :' : Atte
`. `'
`- http://www.atte.dk
I attached the
problematic patch, could someone verify that
behaviour on their systems?
9% on a P4M notebook with 1.6GHz. 
8:59 p.m.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:46:23 +0200
Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Christoph Eckert wrote:
Hmmm. Here it about 50% on a P4 notebook, 2.4G, so about comparable
systems...
I think I found out more. It only happens if the valve saturation plugin
is left without input for some time. I can trigger it *every* time and
make it go away *every* time.
Of course this might be a bug in a number of places. Might also be my
specific combination of versions/kernel/refrigerator :-)
sounds like some denormal problem. Maybe route some noise into it [very
low level]. And contact the author about it.
Flo
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://affenbande.org/~tapas/
I attached
the problematic patch, could someone verify that
behaviour on their systems?
9% on a P4M notebook with 1.6GHz. 
9:10 p.m.
On Sunday 17 July 2005 23:46, Atte André Jensen wrote:
I think I found out more. It only happens if the valve
saturation plugin
is left without input for some time. I can trigger it *every* time and
make it go away *every* time.
That is diagnostic of a denormal problem, probably a IIR filter that doesn't
handle the tail of the decay properly.
This effect tends to show up very badly on PIV type chips.
It is a bug, but is a fairly easy fix.
Regards, Dan.
11:29 a.m.
Hallo,
Atte André Jensen hat gesagt: // Atte André Jensen wrote:
My problem is that I mostly use my setup live, so
stability and
predictability is *very* important for me...
If you can stand the interface, maybe Pd is an alternative? It's
generally rock-solid and has a huge user and developer base.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
_ __latest track: "plak" @ http://footils.org/cms/show/44
12:02 p.m.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
If you can stand the interface, maybe Pd is an
alternative? It's
generally rock-solid and has a huge user and developer base.
I looked at it a couple of years ago. IMHO it didn't handle polyphony
very gracefully, as you had to hardcode the number of voices into each
patch. Maybe that has changed?
At that time I was looking for a do-it-all system, and ended up staying
with csound which I knew already. Now I'm trying out the posibility of
using a mixture of softsynths together over jack. So in that light PD
might be useful as a monophonic synth...
--
.''`. Peace, love & harmony
: :' : Atte
`. `'
`- http://www.atte.dk
2:11 p.m.
Hallo,
Atte André Jensen hat gesagt: // Atte André Jensen wrote:
I looked at it a couple of years ago. IMHO it
didn't handle polyphony
very gracefully, as you had to hardcode the number of voices into each
patch. Maybe that has changed?
Polyphony is still not done automatically as in Csound. Yout have to
do it by hand, but thanks to abstractions and some externals like
"dynext" it's really not hard at all to do polyphonic music. I mean,
otherwise not so many people would use Pd and Max, would they?
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
_ __latest track: "plak" @ http://footils.org/cms/show/44
4:44 p.m.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
If you can stand the interface, maybe Pd is an
alternative? It's
generally rock-solid and has a huge user and developer base.
I'll spend time dusting off what pd I know and see where it leads.
If you're referring to the look of the pd gui, I must admit I always
thought it was quite cool. If you mean gui versus text based, I'll have
to give it a try...
--
.''`. Peace, love & harmony
: :' : Atte
`. `'
`- http://www.atte.dk
18 Jul
18 Jul
7:06 a.m.
Hallo,
Atte André Jensen hat gesagt: // Atte André Jensen wrote:
If you're referring to the look of the pd gui, I
must admit I always
thought it was quite cool. If you mean gui versus text based, I'll have
to give it a try...
Yep, I meant both and additionally some people are put off by Pd
using the old-fashioned Tk toolkit instead of some fancy, themable,
anti-aliased WxGQtk2.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
_ __latest track: "plak" @ http://footils.org/cms/show/44
17 Jul
17 Jul
10:53 a.m.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:44:39AM -0000, Dubphil wrote:
Is there any ebuild for Om ?
http://gnarlie.ath.cx/~gnarlie/om_and_smack_ebuilds/
---
Thorsten Wilms
3:01 p.m.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:44:39AM -0000, Dubphil
wrote:
thanks Thorsten, I will make a try ...
Philippe
Is there any ebuild for Om ?
http://gnarlie.ath.cx/~gnarlie/om_and_smack_ebuilds/
7052
days inactive
7072
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
72 comments
42 participants
participants (42)
-
André Alves Pereira -
Arnold Krille -
Atte André Jensen -
Benjamin Racher -
Brett McCoy -
Christoph Eckert -
Dan Mills -
Dave Phillips -
David L. Craig -
Dubphil -
elgrande -
Emmanuel saracco -
Esben Stien -
Florian Schmidt -
Frank Barknecht -
Frank smith -
Frode Haugsgjerd -
Hartmut Noack -
J_Zar -
james＠dis-dot-dat.net -
John Mulholland -
joke -
Jorge Salgueiro -
Kevin Cosgrove -
Lars Luthman -
luis jure -
Michael Wagner -
michael＠michaelshiloh.com -
nathan c. dickerson -
October -
paniq＠paniq.org -
Paul Winkler -
pirrone -
R Parker -
Reuben Martin -
Rob Fell -
Russell Hanaghan -
Salvatore Di Pietro -
Steve D -
studio-64
-
Thorsten Wilms -
tim hall