4 May
2007
4 May
'07
5:44 p.m.
Is there a multi-track recorder that is designed to be operated
with keystrokes instead of mouse clicks ? It doesn't have to
support Jack, editing, plugins, MIDI or anything fancy. It doesn't
matter whether it uses curses or X. But it *has* to be optimised
for mouseless use.
Ksi is out of the picture for the moment.
Thanks.
--
André Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>
Do not use this account for regular correspondence.
See the URL above for contact information.
4 May
4 May
5:49 p.m.
On Fri May 04, 2007 at 09:44:08PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
Is there a multi-track recorder that is designed to be
operated
with keystrokes instead of mouse clicks ? It doesn't have to
support Jack, editing, plugins, MIDI or anything fancy. It doesn't
matter whether it uses curses or X. But it *has* to be optimised
for mouseless use.
protux seemed to be designed for this style of working (ok it said keyboard + mouse, with
an emphasis on keyboard)
perhaps ecawave.. or snd... in that thyere likely easy to customize the keystrokes.
cant you adjust keystrokse really easily in ardour2?
Ksi is out of the picture for the moment.
Thanks.
--
André Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>
Do not use this account for regular correspondence.
See the URL above for contact information.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
22 May
22 May
6:46 p.m.
On 2007-05-04 15:49 -0400, carmen wrote:
On Fri May 04, 2007 at 09:44:08PM +0200, Andre Majorel
wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions Carmen and Frank.
As far as I can see, Protux is really a traditional WIMP program
with slightly less sucky keyboard shortcuts.
snd is too general for what I need (and I never was able to "get"
it).
Ecawave looks more promising but, like snd, it's too general.
Unless I'm missing something, creating and arming tracks are
many-keystrokes operations.
Is there a multi-track recorder that is designed
to be operated
with keystrokes instead of mouse clicks ? It doesn't have to
support Jack, editing, plugins, MIDI or anything fancy. It doesn't
matter whether it uses curses or X. But it *has* to be optimised
for mouseless use.
protux seemed to be designed for this style of working (ok it
said keyboard + mouse, with an emphasis on keyboard)
perhaps ecawave.. or snd... in that thyere likely easy to
customize the keystrokes. cant you adjust keystrokse really easily in ardour2?
It's not about bindings, it's about being designed from the start
with the keyboard in mind. Ardour uses the WIMP model.
--
André Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>
Do not use this account for regular correspondence.
See the URL above for contact information.
9:49 p.m.
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 22:46 +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
It's not about bindings, it's about being
designed from the start
with the keyboard in mind. Ardour uses the WIMP model.
ardour/ksi (the key stroke interface) was an entirely text-based
interface to the ardour backend. it has not been supported for some
time. making it work again would likely be a few days work. it does
recording, plugins, configuration all using just the keyboard, no X
involved at all.
--p
4 May
4 May
7:42 p.m.
Hallo,
Andre Majorel hat gesagt: // Andre Majorel wrote:
Is there a multi-track recorder that is designed to be
operated
with keystrokes instead of mouse clicks ? It doesn't have to
support Jack, editing, plugins, MIDI or anything fancy. It doesn't
matter whether it uses curses or X. But it *has* to be optimised
for mouseless use.
I'd recommend ecasound
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
6445
days inactive
6466
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
5 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Andre Majorel -
carmen -
Frank Barknecht -
Marius Stoica -
Paul Davis