Atte André Jensen ha scritto:
Hi
I just compiled om with lash support. It seams to me that lash is the
hugely missing piece of software that if generally supported would
take linux audio to the next level (to say the least).
i just would love it!
my typical setup, using both hw & sw synths, is:
- qjackctl (with heavy audio & midi patching) :)
- seq24
- another seq24 (maybe)
- zynaddsubfx
- hydrogen
- jack-rack
- ardour
except for ardour, which is for the recording stage, re-creating the
last setup of a project is a so-called pain-in-the-ass...
Also what's the general atitude amongs developers
towards lash? Should
we start lobbying for the developers our pet software to implement
lash support?
i think we should... :)
--
ciao
Federico