1 Apr
2017
1 Apr
'17
8:22 a.m.
On Mar 31, 2017 22:12, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
I think I'd recommend moving them to /dev/blackhole instead. :)
David W. Jones
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
On 01 Apr 2017, at 01:22, Jeanette C.
<julien(a)mail.uni-paderborn.de> wrote:
I started thinking, it wasn't that time of year, but then I noticed that it actually
is.
A filter rule to move mails from this particular date to a special folder (Krusty folder)
doesn't harm ;).
This might work with a filter rule based on physics. Since this date does cause some kind
of intellectual vacuum, the Casimir effect should work to move those mails to the Krusty
folder. 
1 Apr
1 Apr
9:56 a.m.
New subject: Close, but no cigar
On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 22:22 -1000, David Jones wrote:
On Mar 31, 2017 22:12, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
I think I'd recommend moving them to /dev/blackhole instead. :)
Then another you or me in a parallel universe would receive duplicated
messages, respl. all of us would receive multiple messages, if this
would be done by several you or me. We would get rid of the messages
from our universe, but receive several new from the multiverse. Let
alone that feedback might be possible, if so, we actually would receive
an endless amount of the original emails we moved to /dev/blackhole.
Such blackhole loops could be misused for advanced DDoS or e-mail chain
letters.
On 01 Apr 2017, at 01:22, Jeanette C.
<julien(a)mail.uni-paderborn.de> wrote:
I started thinking, it wasn't that time of year, but then I noticed that it actually
is.
A filter rule to move mails from this particular date to a special folder (Krusty folder)
doesn't harm ;).
This might work with a filter rule based on physics. Since this date does cause some kind
of intellectual vacuum, the Casimir effect should work to move those mails to the Krusty
folder. 
11:01 a.m.
New subject: Close, but no cigar
On Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:56:46 +0200 Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 22:22 -1000, David Jones wrote:
Multiverse Blackhole Distributed Denial of Service!
Now that is something to save for the future! Btw, do we know _when_
these messages would be released by the blackhole? Maybe with the right
energy we can make these messages reappear in a year?
On Mar 31, 2017 22:12, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>
wrote:
I think I'd recommend moving them to /dev/blackhole instead. :)
Then another you or me in a parallel universe would receive duplicated
messages, respl. all of us would receive multiple messages, if this
would be done by several you or me. We would get rid of the messages
from our universe, but receive several new from the multiverse. Let
alone that feedback might be possible, if so, we actually would
receive an endless amount of the original emails we moved
to /dev/blackhole. Such blackhole loops could be misused for advanced
DDoS or e-mail chain letters. On 01 Apr 2017, at 01:22, Jeanette C.
<julien(a)mail.uni-paderborn.de> wrote: I started thinking, it
wasn't that time of year, but then I noticed that it actually
is.
A filter rule to move mails from this particular date to a
special folder (Krusty folder) doesn't harm ;). This might work
with a filter rule based on physics. Since this date does cause
some kind of intellectual vacuum, the Casimir effect should work
to move those mails to the Krusty folder. 
1:41 p.m.
New subject: Close, but no cigar
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:01:05 +0200
Arnold Krille <arnold(a)arnoldarts.de> wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:56:46 +0200 Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
Actually, I think I got some of these 5 years ago.
They were dated 22/2/2222
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 22:22 -1000, David Jones
wrote:
Multiverse Blackhole Distributed Denial of Service!
Now that is something to save for the future! Btw, do we know _when_
these messages would be released by the blackhole? Maybe with the right
energy we can make these messages reappear in a year? On Mar 31, 2017 22:12, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>
wrote:
Then another you or me in a parallel universe would receive duplicated
messages, respl. all of us would receive multiple messages, if this
would be done by several you or me. We would get rid of the messages
from our universe, but receive several new from the multiverse. Let
alone that feedback might be possible, if so, we actually would
receive an endless amount of the original emails we moved
to /dev/blackhole. Such blackhole loops could be misused for advanced
DDoS or e-mail chain letters.
> On 01 Apr 2017, at 01:22, Jeanette C.
> <julien(a)mail.uni-paderborn.de> wrote: I started thinking, it
> wasn't that time of year, but then I noticed that it actually
> is.
A filter rule to move mails from this particular date to a
special folder (Krusty folder) doesn't harm ;). This might work
with a filter rule based on physics. Since this date does cause
some kind of intellectual vacuum, the Casimir effect should work
to move those mails to the Krusty folder.
I think I'd recommend moving them to /dev/blackhole instead. :)
7:06 p.m.
New subject: Close, but no cigar
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 14:41:36 +0100, Will Godfrey wrote:
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:01:05 +0200 Arnold Krille wrote:
Regarding http://www.hillschmidt.de/gbr/sternenzeit.htm
22/02/2222 22:22:22 +0200 this is
stardate -100854.98027650919
Regarding http://www.trekzone.de/sfrs/stardate.php it is
stardate 487292.93 (Sternzeit 487292,93)
How should we "interpret" 22/2/2222?
Those messages were send on 1/4/>2017 and the header shows
Date: 22/2/2222?
Perhaps the "Received:" headers are more enlightening. Maybe the mails
travelled back and forth through time from one to the other server.
Do those names of the servers show something interesting? Something
like "from holy.roman.empire.edu"?
Now that is something to save for the future!
Btw, do we know _when_
these messages would be released by the blackhole? Maybe with the
right energy we can make these messages reappear in a year?
Actually, I think I got some of these 5 years ago.
They were dated 22/2/2222 
8:32 p.m.
New subject: Close, but no cigar
Ralf Mandorf:
...
Regarding
http://www.hillschmidt.de/gbr/sternenzeit.htm
22/02/2222 22:22:22 +0200 this is
stardate -100854.98027650919
...
How should we "interpret" 22/2/2222?
Trust your hillschmidt, that date is prehistoric, use bc:
$ echo 22/2/2222 | bc -l
.00495049504950495049
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57
8:57 p.m.
New subject: Close, but no cigar
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 22:32:25 +0200 (CEST)
karl(a)aspodata.se wrote:
Ralf Mandorf:
...
Ah! Magic numbers - poked a memory from a *very* long time ago.
142857
Multiply by any integer up to 6 and you get the same sequence,
but starting at a different point.
For the joker, multiply by 7.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
Regarding
http://www.hillschmidt.de/gbr/sternenzeit.htm
22/02/2222 22:22:22 +0200 this is
stardate -100854.98027650919
...
How should we "interpret" 22/2/2222?
Trust your hillschmidt, that date is prehistoric, use bc:
$ echo 22/2/2222 | bc -l
.00495049504950495049
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
9:20 p.m.
New subject: Close, but no cigar
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 21:56:50 +0100, Will Godfrey wrote:
Ah! Magic numbers
For the good and the bad, gifted people more likely tend to magical
thinking, interacting with traumas. To consider something as a "magic
number" could be either "mad" or "well-conceived", however, the
much
likely amount of absolute truth, even by the sense of humans
with an uncontroversial IQ higher than above the average, tends to
be absolutely controversial. Äh ... I should rephrase in my native
language :D.
--
"Michael" described Floyd as "an idiot savant", and added, "Give
him
any two numbers, and he can multiply them in his head, just like that."
Homer, testing Floyd, said, "Five times nine", and Floyd instantly
responded "Forty-five", which impressed Homer.
9:01 p.m.
New subject: Close, but no cigar
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 22:32:25 +0200 (CEST), karl(a)aspodata.se wrote:
Ralf Mandorf:
...
Thank you,
unfortunately I suspect that I was mistaken. More likely a blackhole
doesn't cause feedback between dimensions. It more likely sucks as much
as it could and only releases some completely ripped information it
wasn't able to gulp.
IMO we even shouldn't focus on /dev/wormhole. However, there are
evidences that some scientists who missed teen games, such as "spin the
bottle", compensates sexual frustration by completely self-explaining
math. IOW my guess is, that math is "just" a part of the nature, that
can't explain the whole nature. IOW even the wormhole more likely is
some kind of off odd wanking, to compensate oppressed sexuality.
Even S.H. is just a brand, that has completely nothing to do with
objective science.
Regarding
http://www.hillschmidt.de/gbr/sternenzeit.htm
22/02/2222 22:22:22 +0200 this is
stardate -100854.98027650919
...
How should we "interpret" 22/2/2222?
Trust your hillschmidt, that date is prehistoric, use bc:
$ echo 22/2/2222 | bc -l
.00495049504950495049
2900
days inactive
2900
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
8 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Arnold Krille -
David Jones -
karl＠aspodata.se -
Ralf Mardorf -
Will Godfrey