26 Apr
2006
26 Apr
'06
4:57 a.m.
Hi all,
as it is LAC time, it's also release time :) .
Simple Sysexxer is a GUI sysex tool comparable to Sysexxer, but it's
based on Qt4 (no KDE dependency) and ALSA only (no OSS dependency).
Theoretically it should also build and run on Mac OS X, but I didn't try
it yet.
Feedback and bugreports are always welcome.
Information and source code:
http://www.christeck.de
Best regards
ce
27 Apr
27 Apr
11:34 p.m.
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 09:59, Christoph Eckert was like:
Simple Sysexxer is a GUI sysex tool comparable to
Sysexxer, but it's
based on Qt4 (no KDE dependency) and ALSA only (no OSS dependency).
This tool looks great Christoph. Sadly I don't appear to have qt4 installed,
so this will have to wait until after the weekend at least.
--
cheers,
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk/tim
30 Apr
30 Apr
5:55 a.m.
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:51:56 +0200
Christoph Eckert <ce(a)christeck.de> wrote:
Hi Tim,
A question.
Is there something in qt 4 you ESPECIALLY need? I think most people
only have qt3
--
F
This tool looks great Christoph. Sadly I
don't appear to have qt4
installed, so this will have to wait until after the weekend at
least.
if you have Qt4 installed and need further assistance, don't hesitate to
ask me for support.
Best regards
ce
7:53 a.m.
Hi,
Is there something in qt 4 you ESPECIALLY need? I
think most people
only have qt3
yes, I used it with reason :) . One important thing was better support
for multithreading.
Furthermore: I know at the moment most people have Qt3 installed. But
this will change *very* soon as KDE 4 gets released this summer. Then
many people would ask me to port to Qt4. And this would have been *lots*
of work due to heavy changes from Qt3 to Qt4.
So, is it a problem to install Qt4 besides Qt3? ON Gentoo, it works
perfectly.
Best regards
ce
6577
days inactive
6581
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Christoph Eckert -
Folderol -
tim hall