28 Jun
2006
28 Jun
'06
6:18 p.m.
After doing some searching on google I have found that
versions
of JACK 0.80 and under supported ASIO, but it was removed in later
versions
I was thinking of trying to write such a thing but do not understand
Steinberg's code well enough. It is "non-free" which I guess is why it was
taken out. I want it back :-)
28 Jun
28 Jun
6:57 p.m.
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 23:18 +0300, David Baron wrote:
I don't think JACK's "ASIO mode" did what you think it did. It was
just
a different method of buffer handling.
JACK is to Linux what ASIO is to Windows. JACK already provides the
lowest latency/highest quality that the hardware can deliver.
David: What problem are you trying to solve?
Lee
After doing
some searching on google I have found that versions
of JACK 0.80 and under supported ASIO, but it was removed in later
versions
I was thinking of trying to write such a thing but do not understand
Steinberg's code well enough. It is "non-free" which I guess is why it was
taken out. I want it back :-)
29 Jun
29 Jun
9:39 a.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: linux-audio-user Digest, Vol 33, Issue 86
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 23:18 +0300, David Baron wrote:
it had nothing to do with ASIO other than share a particular type of
behaviour with ASIO that wasn't in JACK by default.
ASIO on linux makes absolutely zero sense at all - in most senses JACK
*is* ASIO for linux (and OSX, and now c/o Stephane's work, for win32 as
well). the only place it would make sense is inside wine, but several
wine people have told me that this will never happen.
lets suppose that you had "ASIO for linux" - it would allow precisely
nothing to run.
--p
After doing
some searching on google I have found that versions
of JACK 0.80 and under supported ASIO, but it was removed in later
versions
I was thinking of trying to write such a thing but do not understand
Steinberg's code well enough. It is "non-free" which I guess is why it was
taken out. I want it back :-)
6520
days inactive
6521
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
David Baron -
Lee Revell -
Paul Davis