29 Aug
2005
29 Aug
'05
12:46 p.m.
I've recently tried pd on Suse 9.3 x86_64. When running the sample patch
'filter_floyd' which emulates the famous DSOTM vcs3 riff, I get a result
which is poorer than the same under windows or os x. I tried both
compiling latest version and installing a rpm for suse x86_64.
I think it can be some audio library's fault.
Any hint?
c.
29 Aug
29 Aug
1:06 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 04:46:21PM +0200, Cesare Marilungo wrote:
I've recently tried pd on Suse 9.3 x86_64. When
running the sample patch
'filter_floyd' which emulates the famous DSOTM vcs3 riff, I get a result
which is poorer than the same under windows or os x. I tried both
compiling latest version and installing a rpm for suse x86_64.
I think it can be some audio library's fault.
pd doesnt work right on x86_64. sorry...
Any hint?
c.
1:29 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] pd sound screwed on suse 9.3 x86_64 - SOLVED
In fact. I tried with a non 64bit rpm version and it worked.
Thanks,
c.
carmen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 04:46:21PM +0200, Cesare
Marilungo wrote:
I've recently tried pd on Suse 9.3 x86_64.
When running the sample patch
'filter_floyd' which emulates the famous DSOTM vcs3 riff, I get a result
which is poorer than the same under windows or os x. I tried both
compiling latest version and installing a rpm for suse x86_64.
I think it can be some audio library's fault.
pd doesnt work right on x86_64. sorry...
Any hint?
c.
1:46 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] pd sound screwed on suse 9.3 x86_64 - SOLVED
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:28 +0200, Cesare Marilungo wrote:
In fact. I tried with a non 64bit rpm version and it
worked.
I don't know the Pd source at all, but it seems like this shouldn't be
too hard to fix.
Lee
2:01 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] pd sound screwed on suse 9.3 x86_64 - SOLVED
I think that most x86_64 rpm are built just changing pointers size (int
-> long) in source files and rebuilding.
c.
Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:28 +0200, Cesare Marilungo
wrote:
In fact. I tried with a non 64bit rpm version and
it worked.
I don't know the Pd source at all, but it seems like this shouldn't be
too hard to fix.
Lee
2:28 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] pd sound screwed on suse 9.3 x86_64 - SOLVED
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 18:01 +0200, Cesare Marilungo wrote:
I think that most x86_64 rpm are built just changing
pointers size (int
-> long) in source files and rebuilding.
But that's the wrong solution, it's broken to assume the size of a
pointer. If the code is correct then the same source should compile on
32 and 64 bit platforms.
Lee
2:24 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] pd sound screwed on suse 9.3 x86_64 - SOLVED
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:46:21AM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:28 +0200, Cesare Marilungo
wrote:
please fix it then,
thanks..
In fact. I tried with a non 64bit rpm version and
it worked.
I don't know the Pd source at all, but it seems like this shouldn't be
too hard to fix.
Lee
2:49 p.m.
New subject: [linux-audio-user] pd sound screwed on suse 9.3 x86_64 - SOLVED
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 16:22 +0000, carmen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:46:21AM -0400, Lee Revell
wrote:
Sorry, you're on your own. I don't use PD nor do I have the time to fix
it.
Lee
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:28 +0200, Cesare
Marilungo wrote:
please fix it then,
thanks.. In fact. I tried with a non 64bit rpm version and
it worked.
I don't know the Pd source at all, but it seems like this shouldn't be
too hard to fix.
7027
days inactive
7027
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
carmen -
Cesare Marilungo -
Lee Revell